From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+fb0b6a7e8713aeb0319c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: Emulate triple fault shutdown if RSM emulation fails
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:29:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61e9ec9e-d4f5-bea5-942a-21c259278094@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87eedayvkn.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
On 10/06/21 10:26, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> So should we actually have X86EMUL_CONTINUE when we queue
> KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT here?
Yes...
> (Initially, my comment was supposed to be 'why don't you add
> TRIPLE_FAULT to smm selftest?' but the above overshadows it)
... and a tenth patch to add a selftest would be nice to have indeed.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-10 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-09 18:56 [PATCH 0/9] KVM: x86: Fix NULL pointer #GP due to RSM bug Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 18:56 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: x86: Immediately reset the MMU context when the SMM flag is cleared Sean Christopherson
2021-06-10 13:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-09 18:56 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: Emulate triple fault shutdown if RSM emulation fails Sean Christopherson
2021-06-10 8:26 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-06-10 13:29 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-06-10 15:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-10 15:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-11 11:42 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-06-10 13:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-09 18:56 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: x86: Replace .set_hflags() with dedicated .exiting_smm() helper Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 18:56 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: x86: Invoke kvm_smm_changed() immediately after clearing SMM flag Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 18:56 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: x86: Move (most) SMM hflags modifications into kvm_smm_changed() Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 18:56 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: x86: Move "entering SMM" tracepoint " Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 18:56 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: x86: Rename SMM tracepoint to make it reflect reality Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 18:56 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86: Drop .post_leave_smm(), i.e. the manual post-RSM MMU reset Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 18:56 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: Drop "pre_" from enter/leave_smm() helpers Sean Christopherson
2021-06-10 13:28 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM: x86: Fix NULL pointer #GP due to RSM bug Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61e9ec9e-d4f5-bea5-942a-21c259278094@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=syzbot+fb0b6a7e8713aeb0319c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).