On 11.09.21 17:26, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Wouldn't it be simpler to just revert 76b4f357d0e7 and rename
> KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID to KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS?
> 
> As far as I can see, every single line of code in KVM (except the 3
> lines touched by 76b4f357d0e7) treats both KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID and
> KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID as exclusive. Including the API documentation.

I agree.

Will send patches.


Juergen