Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 9/9] s390x: sclp: Add CPU entry offset comment

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 12.01.21 14:20, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Let's make it clear that there is something at the end of the
> struct. The exact offset is reported by the cpu_offset member.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  lib/s390x/sclp.h | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.h b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
> index dccbaa8..395895f 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/sclp.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
> @@ -134,7 +134,10 @@ typedef struct ReadInfo {
>  	uint8_t reserved7[134 - 128];
>  	uint8_t byte_134_diag318 : 1;
>  	uint8_t : 7;
> -	struct CPUEntry entries[0];
> +	/*
> +	 * The cpu entries follow, they start at the offset specified
> +	 * in offset_cpu.
> +	 */

I mean, that's just best practice. At least when I spot "[0];" and the
end of a struct, I know what's happening.

No strong opinion about the comment, I wouldn't need it to understand it.

>  } __attribute__((packed)) ReadInfo;
>  
>  typedef struct ReadCpuInfo {
> 


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb