kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: prashantbhole.linux@gmail.com,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] tuntap: reorganize tun_msg_ctl usage
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 15:44:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <739281a8-59fe-d898-0147-656d01fdfabc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191012015357.1775-2-prashantbhole.linux@gmail.com>


On 2019/10/12 上午9:53, prashantbhole.linux@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Prashant Bhole <prashantbhole.linux@gmail.com>
>
> In order to extend the usage of tun_msg_ctl structure, this patch
> changes the member name from type to cmd. Also following definitions
> are changed:
> TUN_MSG_PTR : TUN_CMD_BATCH
> TUN_MSG_UBUF: TUN_CMD_PACKET


Not a native English speaker, but the conversion here looks not as 
straightforward as it did.

For TUN_MSG_PTR, it means recvmsg() can do receiving from a pointer to 
either XDP or skb instead of ptr_ring. TUN_CMD_BATCH sounds not related.

For TUN_MSG_UBUF, it means the packet is a zercopy (buffer pointers to 
userspace). TUN_CMD_PACKET may bring confusion in this case.

Thanks


>
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <prashantbhole.linux@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/tap.c      | 9 ++++++---
>   drivers/net/tun.c      | 8 ++++++--
>   drivers/vhost/net.c    | 4 ++--
>   include/linux/if_tun.h | 6 +++---
>   4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c
> index 3ae70c7e6860..01bd260ce60c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
> @@ -1213,9 +1213,10 @@ static int tap_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
>   	struct tap_queue *q = container_of(sock, struct tap_queue, sock);
>   	struct tun_msg_ctl *ctl = m->msg_control;
>   	struct xdp_buff *xdp;
> +	void *ptr = NULL;
>   	int i;
>   
> -	if (ctl && (ctl->type == TUN_MSG_PTR)) {
> +	if (ctl && ctl->cmd == TUN_CMD_BATCH) {
>   		for (i = 0; i < ctl->num; i++) {
>   			xdp = &((struct xdp_buff *)ctl->ptr)[i];
>   			tap_get_user_xdp(q, xdp);
> @@ -1223,8 +1224,10 @@ static int tap_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
>   		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> -	return tap_get_user(q, ctl ? ctl->ptr : NULL, &m->msg_iter,
> -			    m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
> +	if (ctl && ctl->cmd == TUN_CMD_PACKET)
> +		ptr = ctl->ptr;
> +
> +	return tap_get_user(q, ptr, &m->msg_iter, m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
>   }
>   
>   static int tap_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 0413d182d782..29711671959b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -2529,11 +2529,12 @@ static int tun_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len)
>   	struct tun_struct *tun = tun_get(tfile);
>   	struct tun_msg_ctl *ctl = m->msg_control;
>   	struct xdp_buff *xdp;
> +	void *ptr = NULL;
>   
>   	if (!tun)
>   		return -EBADFD;
>   
> -	if (ctl && (ctl->type == TUN_MSG_PTR)) {
> +	if (ctl && ctl->cmd == TUN_CMD_BATCH) {
>   		struct tun_page tpage;
>   		int n = ctl->num;
>   		int flush = 0;
> @@ -2560,7 +2561,10 @@ static int tun_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len)
>   		goto out;
>   	}
>   
> -	ret = tun_get_user(tun, tfile, ctl ? ctl->ptr : NULL, &m->msg_iter,
> +	if (ctl && ctl->cmd == TUN_CMD_PACKET)
> +		ptr = ctl->ptr;
> +
> +	ret = tun_get_user(tun, tfile, ptr, &m->msg_iter,
>   			   m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
>   			   m->msg_flags & MSG_MORE);
>   out:
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index 1a2dd53caade..5946d2775bd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static void vhost_tx_batch(struct vhost_net *net,
>   			   struct msghdr *msghdr)
>   {
>   	struct tun_msg_ctl ctl = {
> -		.type = TUN_MSG_PTR,
> +		.cmd = TUN_CMD_BATCH,
>   		.num = nvq->batched_xdp,
>   		.ptr = nvq->xdp,
>   	};
> @@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static void handle_tx_zerocopy(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
>   			ubuf->desc = nvq->upend_idx;
>   			refcount_set(&ubuf->refcnt, 1);
>   			msg.msg_control = &ctl;
> -			ctl.type = TUN_MSG_UBUF;
> +			ctl.cmd = TUN_CMD_PACKET;
>   			ctl.ptr = ubuf;
>   			msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(ctl);
>   			ubufs = nvq->ubufs;
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_tun.h b/include/linux/if_tun.h
> index 5bda8cf457b6..bdfa671612db 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_tun.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_tun.h
> @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
>   
>   #define TUN_XDP_FLAG 0x1UL
>   
> -#define TUN_MSG_UBUF 1
> -#define TUN_MSG_PTR  2
> +#define TUN_CMD_PACKET 1
> +#define TUN_CMD_BATCH  2
>   struct tun_msg_ctl {
> -	unsigned short type;
> +	unsigned short cmd;
>   	unsigned short num;
>   	void *ptr;
>   };

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-12  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-12  1:53 [PATCH net-next 0/3] vhost_net: access ptr ring using tap recvmsg prashantbhole.linux
2019-10-12  1:53 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] tuntap: reorganize tun_msg_ctl usage prashantbhole.linux
2019-10-12  7:44   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2019-10-15  0:33     ` Prashant Bhole
2019-10-12  1:53 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] vhost_net: user tap recvmsg api to access ptr ring prashantbhole.linux
2019-10-12  7:54   ` Jason Wang
2019-10-12 20:41   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-10-15  0:57     ` Prashant Bhole
2019-10-12  1:53 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] tuntap: remove usage of ptr ring in vhost_net prashantbhole.linux
2019-10-12  7:57 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] vhost_net: access ptr ring using tap recvmsg Jason Wang
2019-10-12 20:38   ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=739281a8-59fe-d898-0147-656d01fdfabc@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prashantbhole.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).