From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D5DC433ED for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 20:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CFE61166 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 20:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231825AbhEDUUP (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2021 16:20:15 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:34326 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231579AbhEDUUN (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2021 16:20:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620159557; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XT5wmldVjcj9qzq2rbcAVF3LYdtWWQb01hB//6q8U0E=; b=YkAMpQTWV4EirDr71uhXgmVeEIfq7sxMJS7FwM6H+FYb1Qc0aY2KW+589Sm9quvvnQ9upb IpKw7FE9NRpGjm14v9kK/otJXR1AeCiaEH0OUwFR5E8cQ6WftQWpC0IDYhjfJ41WGXxuWe Wryq05wR4ZYmWskqmUors0hEBV0Z0kM= Received: from mail-ej1-f71.google.com (mail-ej1-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-221-BwjIy3VsMbaB1ys089EmrQ-1; Tue, 04 May 2021 16:19:15 -0400 X-MC-Unique: BwjIy3VsMbaB1ys089EmrQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f71.google.com with SMTP id yh1-20020a17090706e1b029038d0f848c7aso3614326ejb.12 for ; Tue, 04 May 2021 13:19:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XT5wmldVjcj9qzq2rbcAVF3LYdtWWQb01hB//6q8U0E=; b=nDWmJo9z3eUM0b6NZnGGlurwBpPhi3VpV7Efg6J5erPehnRnXtQoF98a/VpjUU8Efg niRBCs4jSNXFJvB2hH6vqrY+JYHGKQe1zuqQsuY1gQhDuJFDw9Mn7pL9tn+PfAGs+ly7 XTKUKN4OXjcS1Yh2Syat4kyAuTJXttdVFFbo3t1Bk4AaT6QpiffL57Kd5PA9E6//DAeK pL9HBM6fStCbv4W2WT67aXRVjD1+XtR6odFk0jLGK+RM3iW+vz9UF7NdZAg3GtCB7/G2 MjigtuPh6pF7x9fY9EtIYDw2f7onDjzk8iKWVZvvSr5A5pYquQHOlZg0SpZdZoLNSRCD DjVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Iq+k3zVrEgPIv74Gc1f8vPF281zCtb4diRq28LENoHR4rNUUs SaF9ZH1fhjuWVdoCHvVrmfG7eakz3X2CVa2uSNvnbEJc4RSyk1qmSXRanYJF7lmXJzNpveDuecZ mNQ97gy3mh1eG X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f0d1:: with SMTP id dk17mr24298929ejb.256.1620159554133; Tue, 04 May 2021 13:19:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7qgPDq/WT4usRYakJCroraJvYEIPirrEpNH9of0IyZWOEVewfiFFivXTogMTwWuarhK6EJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f0d1:: with SMTP id dk17mr24298918ejb.256.1620159553980; Tue, 04 May 2021 13:19:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:5e2c:eb9a:a8b6:fd3e? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:5e2c:eb9a:a8b6:fd3e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m9sm2013860ejj.53.2021.05.04.13.19.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 May 2021 13:19:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Lazily allocate memslot rmaps To: Sean Christopherson , Ben Gardon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Xu , Peter Shier , Junaid Shahid , Jim Mattson , Yulei Zhang , Wanpeng Li , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Xiao Guangrong References: <20210429211833.3361994-1-bgardon@google.com> <20210429211833.3361994-8-bgardon@google.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <781d2549-bbb1-23a2-44bf-58379ba23054@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 22:19:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 04/05/21 22:13, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> + /* >> + * If set, the rmap should be allocated for any newly created or >> + * modified memslots. If allocating rmaps lazily, this may be set >> + * before the rmaps are allocated for existing memslots, but >> + * shadow_mmu_active will not be set until after the rmaps are fully >> + * allocated. >> + */ >> + bool alloc_memslot_rmaps; > Maybe "need_rmaps" or "need_memslot_rmaps"? > Since we're bikeshedding I prefer "memslots_have_rmaps" or something not too distant from that. Paolo