KVM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: "Suthikulpanit\, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "pbonzini\@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"rkrcmar\@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"joro\@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"graf\@amazon.com" <graf@amazon.com>,
	"jschoenh\@amazon.de" <jschoenh@amazon.de>,
	"karahmed\@amazon.de" <karahmed@amazon.de>,
	"rimasluk\@amazon.com" <rimasluk@amazon.com>, "Grimm\,
	Jon" <Jon.Grimm@amd.com>, "Suthikulpanit\,
	Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/15] kvm: x86: Add support for activate/de-activate APICv at runtime
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:29:58 +0200
Message-ID: <877e6zm5ft.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1565886293-115836-7-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>

"Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> writes:

> Certain runtime conditions require APICv to be temporary deactivated.
> However, current implementation only support permanently deactivate
> APICv at runtime (mainly used when running Hyper-V guest).
>
> In addtion, for AMD, when activate / deactivate APICv during runtime,
> all vcpus in the VM has to be operating in the same APICv mode, which
> requires the requesting (main) vcpu to notify others.
>
> So, introduce interfaces to request all vcpus to activate/deactivate
> APICv.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  9 +++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 04d7066..dfb7c3d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,10 @@
>  #define KVM_REQ_HV_STIMER		KVM_ARCH_REQ(22)
>  #define KVM_REQ_LOAD_EOI_EXITMAP	KVM_ARCH_REQ(23)
>  #define KVM_REQ_GET_VMCS12_PAGES	KVM_ARCH_REQ(24)
> +#define KVM_REQ_APICV_ACTIVATE		\
> +	KVM_ARCH_REQ_FLAGS(25, KVM_REQUEST_WAIT | KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP)
> +#define KVM_REQ_APICV_DEACTIVATE	\
> +	KVM_ARCH_REQ_FLAGS(26, KVM_REQUEST_WAIT | KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP)
>  
>  #define CR0_RESERVED_BITS                                               \
>  	(~(unsigned long)(X86_CR0_PE | X86_CR0_MP | X86_CR0_EM | X86_CR0_TS \
> @@ -1089,6 +1093,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>  	void (*enable_irq_window)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  	void (*update_cr8_intercept)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int tpr, int irr);
>  	bool (*get_enable_apicv)(struct kvm *kvm);
> +	void (*pre_update_apicv_exec_ctrl)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool activate);
>  	void (*refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  	void (*hwapic_irr_update)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int max_irr);
>  	void (*hwapic_isr_update)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int isr);
> @@ -1552,6 +1557,10 @@ int kvm_pv_send_ipi(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long ipi_bitmap_low,
>  
>  void kvm_make_mclock_inprogress_request(struct kvm *kvm);
>  void kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request(struct kvm *kvm);
> +void kvm_vcpu_deactivate_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_vcpu_activate_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_make_apicv_activate_request(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_make_apicv_deactivate_request(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool disable);
>  
>  void kvm_arch_async_page_not_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  				     struct kvm_async_pf *work);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index f9c3f63..40a20bf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include "cpuid.h"
>  #include "pmu.h"
>  #include "hyperv.h"
> +#include "lapic.h"
>  
>  #include <linux/clocksource.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> @@ -7163,6 +7164,22 @@ static void kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long flags, int apicid)
>  	kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(kvm, NULL, &lapic_irq, NULL);
>  }
>  
> +void kvm_vcpu_activate_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu)) {
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(!vcpu->arch.apicv_active);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	if (vcpu->arch.apicv_active)
> +		return;
> +
> +	vcpu->arch.apicv_active = true;
> +	kvm_apic_update_apicv(vcpu);
> +
> +	kvm_x86_ops->refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl(vcpu);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_activate_apicv);
> +
>  void kvm_vcpu_deactivate_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu)) {
> @@ -7173,8 +7190,11 @@ void kvm_vcpu_deactivate_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		return;
>  
>  	vcpu->arch.apicv_active = false;
> +	kvm_apic_update_apicv(vcpu);
> +
>  	kvm_x86_ops->refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl(vcpu);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_deactivate_apicv);
>  
>  int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> @@ -7668,6 +7688,58 @@ void kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_SCAN_IOAPIC);
>  }
>  
> +void kvm_make_apicv_activate_request(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *v;
> +	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.apicv_lock);
> +	if (kvm->arch.apicv_state != APICV_DEACTIVATED) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.apicv_lock);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, v, kvm)
> +		kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_APICV_DEACTIVATE, v);
> +
> +	if (kvm_x86_ops->pre_update_apicv_exec_ctrl)
> +		kvm_x86_ops->pre_update_apicv_exec_ctrl(vcpu, true);
> +
> +	kvm->arch.apicv_state = APICV_ACTIVATED;
> +
> +	kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_APICV_ACTIVATE);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.apicv_lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_make_apicv_activate_request);
> +
> +void kvm_make_apicv_deactivate_request(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool disable)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *v;
> +	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.apicv_lock);
> +	if (kvm->arch.apicv_state == APICV_DEACTIVATED) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.apicv_lock);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, v, kvm)
> +		kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_APICV_ACTIVATE, v);

Could you please elaborate on when we need to eat the
KVM_REQ_APICV_ACTIVATE request here (and KVM_REQ_APICV_DEACTIVATE in
kvm_make_apicv_activate_request() respectively)? To me, this looks like
a possible source of hard-to-debug problems in the future.

> +
> +	if (kvm_x86_ops->pre_update_apicv_exec_ctrl)
> +		kvm_x86_ops->pre_update_apicv_exec_ctrl(vcpu, false);
> +
> +	kvm->arch.apicv_state = disable ? APICV_DISABLED : APICV_DEACTIVATED;
> +
> +	kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_APICV_DEACTIVATE);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.apicv_lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_make_apicv_deactivate_request);
> +
>  static void vcpu_scan_ioapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	if (!kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
> @@ -7854,6 +7926,10 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		 */
>  		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_HV_STIMER, vcpu))
>  			kvm_hv_process_stimers(vcpu);
> +		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_APICV_ACTIVATE, vcpu))
> +			kvm_vcpu_activate_apicv(vcpu);
> +		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_APICV_DEACTIVATE, vcpu))
> +			kvm_vcpu_deactivate_apicv(vcpu);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu) || req_int_win) {

-- 
Vitaly

  reply index

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-15 16:25 [PATCH v2 00/15] kvm: x86: Support AMD SVM AVIC w/ in-kernel irqchip mode Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] kvm: x86: Modify kvm_x86_ops.get_enable_apicv() to use struct kvm parameter Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-27  7:15   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] kvm: x86: Introduce KVM APICv state Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19  9:49   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-26 19:06     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] kvm: Add arch-specific per-VM debugfs support Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] kvm: x86: Add per-VM APICv state debugfs Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19  9:57   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-26 19:41     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-27  8:20       ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-28 18:39         ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-28 19:36           ` Graf (AWS), Alexander
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] kvm: lapic: Introduce APICv update helper function Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-27  7:22   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] kvm: x86: Add support for activate/de-activate APICv at runtime Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-27  7:29   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2019-08-27  8:05     ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] kvm: x86: svm: Add support to activate/deactivate posted interrupts Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] svm: Add support for setup/destroy virutal APIC backing page for AVIC Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] svm: Add support for activate/deactivate AVIC at runtime Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19 10:28   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] kvm: x86: hyperv: Use APICv deactivate request interface Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19 10:31   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] svm: Temporary deactivate AVIC during ExtINT handling Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19 10:35   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-28 15:17     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-28 19:37       ` Graf (AWS), Alexander
2019-09-10 15:46         ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] kvm: i8254: Check LAPIC EOI pending when injecting irq on SVM AVIC Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19 10:42   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-26 20:46     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-27  9:10       ` Alexander Graf
2019-09-13 14:50         ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] kvm: lapic: Clean up APIC predefined macros Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] kvm: ioapic: Delay update IOAPIC EOI for RTC Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19 11:00   ` Alexander Graf
2019-09-04  2:06     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] svm: Allow AVIC with in-kernel irqchip mode Suthikulpanit, Suravee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877e6zm5ft.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jon.Grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jschoenh@amazon.de \
    --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rimasluk@amazon.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

KVM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0 kvm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 kvm kvm/ https://lore.kernel.org/kvm \
		kvm@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index kvm

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.kvm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git