KVM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: "Suthikulpanit\, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: "pbonzini\@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"rkrcmar\@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"joro\@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"graf\@amazon.com" <graf@amazon.com>,
	"jschoenh\@amazon.de" <jschoenh@amazon.de>,
	"karahmed\@amazon.de" <karahmed@amazon.de>,
	"rimasluk\@amazon.com" <rimasluk@amazon.com>, "Grimm\,
	Jon" <Jon.Grimm@amd.com>, "Suthikulpanit\,
	Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] kvm: x86: Modify kvm_x86_ops.get_enable_apicv() to use struct kvm parameter
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:15:18 +0200
Message-ID: <87d0grm649.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1565886293-115836-2-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>

"Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> writes:

> Generally, APICv for all vcpus in the VM are enable/disable in the same
> manner. So, get_enable_apicv() should represent APICv status of the VM
> instead of each VCPU.
>
> Modify kvm_x86_ops.get_enable_apicv() to take struct kvm as parameter
> instead of struct kvm_vcpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c              | 5 +++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c          | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 26d1eb8..56bc702 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>  	void (*enable_nmi_window)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  	void (*enable_irq_window)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  	void (*update_cr8_intercept)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int tpr, int irr);
> -	bool (*get_enable_apicv)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +	bool (*get_enable_apicv)(struct kvm *kvm);
>  	void (*refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  	void (*hwapic_irr_update)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int max_irr);
>  	void (*hwapic_isr_update)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int isr);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index ccd5aa6..6851bce 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ struct amd_svm_iommu_ir {
>  static void svm_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr0);
>  static void svm_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool invalidate_gpa);
>  static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
> +static bool svm_get_enable_apicv(struct kvm *kvm);

Why is this forward declaration needed [in this patch]?

>  
>  static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
>  static int nested_svm_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
> @@ -5124,9 +5125,9 @@ static void svm_set_virtual_apic_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return;
>  }
>  
> -static bool svm_get_enable_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static bool svm_get_enable_apicv(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> -	return avic && irqchip_split(vcpu->kvm);
> +	return avic && irqchip_split(kvm);
>  }
>  
>  static void svm_hwapic_irr_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int max_irr)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index d98eac3..18a4b94 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -3610,7 +3610,7 @@ void pt_update_intercept_for_msr(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool vmx_get_enable_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static bool vmx_get_enable_apicv(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	return enable_apicv;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index fafd81d..7daf0dd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -9150,7 +9150,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		goto fail_free_pio_data;
>  
>  	if (irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) {
> -		vcpu->arch.apicv_active = kvm_x86_ops->get_enable_apicv(vcpu);
> +		vcpu->arch.apicv_active = kvm_x86_ops->get_enable_apicv(vcpu->kvm);
>  		r = kvm_create_lapic(vcpu, lapic_timer_advance_ns);
>  		if (r < 0)
>  			goto fail_mmu_destroy;

With the above question answered (or declaration moved to the patch
where it's actually needed)

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

-- 
Vitaly

  reply index

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-15 16:25 [PATCH v2 00/15] kvm: x86: Support AMD SVM AVIC w/ in-kernel irqchip mode Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] kvm: x86: Modify kvm_x86_ops.get_enable_apicv() to use struct kvm parameter Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-27  7:15   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] kvm: x86: Introduce KVM APICv state Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19  9:49   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-26 19:06     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] kvm: Add arch-specific per-VM debugfs support Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] kvm: x86: Add per-VM APICv state debugfs Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19  9:57   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-26 19:41     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-27  8:20       ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-28 18:39         ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-28 19:36           ` Graf (AWS), Alexander
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] kvm: lapic: Introduce APICv update helper function Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-27  7:22   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] kvm: x86: Add support for activate/de-activate APICv at runtime Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-27  7:29   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2019-08-27  8:05     ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] kvm: x86: svm: Add support to activate/deactivate posted interrupts Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] svm: Add support for setup/destroy virutal APIC backing page for AVIC Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] svm: Add support for activate/deactivate AVIC at runtime Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19 10:28   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] kvm: x86: hyperv: Use APICv deactivate request interface Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19 10:31   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] svm: Temporary deactivate AVIC during ExtINT handling Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19 10:35   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-28 15:17     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-28 19:37       ` Graf (AWS), Alexander
2019-09-10 15:46         ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] kvm: i8254: Check LAPIC EOI pending when injecting irq on SVM AVIC Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19 10:42   ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-26 20:46     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-27  9:10       ` Alexander Graf
2019-09-13 14:50         ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] kvm: lapic: Clean up APIC predefined macros Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] kvm: ioapic: Delay update IOAPIC EOI for RTC Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-19 11:00   ` Alexander Graf
2019-09-04  2:06     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-08-15 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] svm: Allow AVIC with in-kernel irqchip mode Suthikulpanit, Suravee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d0grm649.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jon.Grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jschoenh@amazon.de \
    --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rimasluk@amazon.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

KVM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0 kvm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 kvm kvm/ https://lore.kernel.org/kvm \
		kvm@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index kvm

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.kvm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git