From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: kvmclock: Fix vCPUs > 64 can't be online/hotpluged Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:45:10 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87pn277huh.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1610623624-18697-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> writes: > From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> > > The per-cpu vsyscall pvclock data pointer assigns either an element of the > static array hv_clock_boot (#vCPU <= 64) or dynamically allocated memory > hvclock_mem (vCPU > 64), the dynamically memory will not be allocated if > kvmclock vsyscall is disabled, this can result in cpu hotpluged fails in > kvmclock_setup_percpu() which returns -ENOMEM. This patch fixes it by not > assigning vsyscall pvclock data pointer if kvmclock vdso_clock_mode is not > VDSO_CLOCKMODE_PVCLOCK. > > Fixes: 6a1cac56f4 ("x86/kvm: Use __bss_decrypted attribute in shared variables") > Reported-by: Zelin Deng <zelin.deng@linux.alibaba.com> > Tested-by: Haiwei Li <lihaiwei@tencent.com> > Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org#v4.19-rc5+ > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c > index aa59374..0624290 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c > @@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ static int kvmclock_setup_percpu(unsigned int cpu) > * pointers. So carefully check. CPU0 has been set up in init > * already. > */ > - if (!cpu || (p && p != per_cpu(hv_clock_per_cpu, 0))) > + if (!cpu || (p && p != per_cpu(hv_clock_per_cpu, 0)) || > + (kvm_clock.vdso_clock_mode != VDSO_CLOCKMODE_PVCLOCK)) > return 0; The comment above should probably be updated as it is not clear why we check kvm_clock.vdso_clock_mode here. Actually, I would even suggest we introduce a 'kvmclock_tsc_stable' global instead to avoid this indirect check. > > /* Use the static page for the first CPUs, allocate otherwise */ Also, would it be better if we just avoid cpuhp_setup_state() call in this case? E.g. both these ideas combined (completely untested): diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c index aa593743acf6..0827aef3ccb8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ static int kvmclock __initdata = 1; static int kvmclock_vsyscall __initdata = 1; +static bool kvmclock_tsc_stable __ro_after_init = true; static int msr_kvm_system_time __ro_after_init = MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME; static int msr_kvm_wall_clock __ro_after_init = MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK; static u64 kvm_sched_clock_offset __ro_after_init; @@ -275,8 +276,10 @@ static int __init kvm_setup_vsyscall_timeinfo(void) return 0; flags = pvclock_read_flags(&hv_clock_boot[0].pvti); - if (!(flags & PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT)) + if (!(flags & PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT)) { + kvmclock_tsc_stable = false; return 0; + } kvm_clock.vdso_clock_mode = VDSO_CLOCKMODE_PVCLOCK; #endif @@ -325,7 +328,8 @@ void __init kvmclock_init(void) return; } - if (cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN, "kvmclock:setup_percpu", + if (kvmclock_tsc_stable && + cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN, "kvmclock:setup_percpu", kvmclock_setup_percpu, NULL) < 0) { return; } -- Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 13:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-01-14 11:27 Wanpeng Li 2021-01-14 13:45 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message] 2021-01-15 1:15 ` Wanpeng Li 2021-01-18 18:26 ` Paolo Bonzini 2021-01-19 0:28 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=87pn277huh.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \ --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \ --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \ --cc=jmattson@google.com \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \ --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] KVM: kvmclock: Fix vCPUs > 64 can'\''t be online/hotpluged' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).