From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>, Paul Durrant <pdurrant@amazon.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] KVM: x86/xen: avoid blocking in hardirq context in kvm_xen_set_evtchn_fast()
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:00:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8C04AFD0-FC16-4572-AD23-FC7EEF663F11@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227094326.04fd2b09@gandalf.local.home>
On 27 February 2024 14:43:26 GMT, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:49:21 +0000
>David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
>> index c16b6d394d55..d8b5326ecebc 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
>> @@ -1736,9 +1736,23 @@ static int set_shinfo_evtchn_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 port)
>> unsigned long flags;
>> int rc = -EWOULDBLOCK;
>>
>> - read_lock_irqsave(&gpc->lock, flags);
>> + local_irq_save(flags);
>> + if (!read_trylock(&gpc->lock)) {
>
>Note, directly disabling interrupts in PREEMPT_RT is just as bad as doing
>so in non RT and the taking a mutex.
Well, it *isn't* a mutex in non-RT. It's basically a spinlock. And even though RT turns it into a mutex this is only a trylock with a fall back to a slow path in process context, so it ends up being a very short period of irqdisable/lock – just to validate the target address of the cache, and write there. (Or fall back to that slow path, if the cache needs revalidating).
So I think this is probably OK, but...
>Worse yet, in PREEMPT_RT read_unlock_irqrestore() isn't going to re-enable
>interrupts.
... that's kind of odd. I think there's code elsewhere which assumes it will, and pairs it with an explicit local_irq_save() like the above, in a different atomic context (updating runstate time info when being descheduled). So *that* needs changing for RT?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 11:49 [PATCH v2 0/8] KVM: x86/xen updates David Woodhouse
2024-02-27 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] KVM: x86/xen: improve accuracy of Xen timers David Woodhouse
2024-03-04 23:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-05 9:29 ` Paul Durrant
2024-03-05 21:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-06 9:48 ` Paul Durrant
2024-03-06 9:57 ` David Woodhouse
2024-02-27 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] KVM: x86/xen: inject vCPU upcall vector when local APIC is enabled David Woodhouse
2024-02-27 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] KVM: x86/xen: remove WARN_ON_ONCE() with false positives in evtchn delivery David Woodhouse
2024-02-27 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: pfncache: simplify locking and make more self-contained David Woodhouse
2024-03-05 0:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-27 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] KVM: x86/xen: fix recursive deadlock in timer injection David Woodhouse
2024-02-27 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] KVM: x86/xen: split up kvm_xen_set_evtchn_fast() David Woodhouse
2024-02-27 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] KVM: x86/xen: avoid blocking in hardirq context in kvm_xen_set_evtchn_fast() David Woodhouse
2024-02-27 14:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-02-27 17:00 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2024-02-27 17:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-27 17:22 ` David Woodhouse
2024-03-07 9:27 ` David Woodhouse
2024-03-07 10:02 ` David Woodhouse
2024-02-27 17:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-02-27 17:28 ` David Woodhouse
2024-03-08 18:10 ` David Woodhouse
2024-02-27 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: pfncache: clean up rwlock abuse David Woodhouse
2024-02-29 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] KVM: x86/xen updates Sean Christopherson
2024-03-05 0:35 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8C04AFD0-FC16-4572-AD23-FC7EEF663F11@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pdurrant@amazon.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).