From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5848EC2D0B1 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C1F217BA for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="eUvd0qvD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727127AbgBDMNV (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:13:21 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:29499 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727115AbgBDMNV (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:13:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1580818399; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=iEs8HZyVk6Rxn786ymoYxwv7M4tnPGVhtBP3285xSf0=; b=eUvd0qvDQFKl9EMPTUUR5Fs95ZEY95tHCjTBWvnjZdQrLjIRvLjDtFrfEXqmuAQARmiy3t HanC+PrQvfbAjEujh1BFr/mXAgNjYss0/QfyUYWy8DRcCnM/ET31aY/nbu0Qu9/YG0HBqq zLkXf2j8sbpPJla4jdH3iibzPRF/wE0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-128-nG35jAehMde76pnffmIkjw-1; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 07:13:11 -0500 X-MC-Unique: nG35jAehMde76pnffmIkjw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 412CC1882CD8; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.117.121] (ovpn-117-121.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.121]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B8760BE0; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFCv2 08/37] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add initial lifecycle handling To: Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank Cc: KVM , Cornelia Huck , Thomas Huth , Ulrich Weigand , Claudio Imbrenda , Andrea Arcangeli References: <20200203131957.383915-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <20200203131957.383915-9-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABtCREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT6JAlgEEwEIAEICGwMFCQlmAYAGCwkIBwMCBhUI AgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl3pImkCGQEACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1o+VA//SFvIHUAvul05u6wKv/pIR6aICPdpF9EIgEU448g+7FfDgQwcEny1pbEzAmiw zAXIQ9H0NZh96lcq+yDLtONnXk/bEYWHHUA014A1wqcYNRY8RvY1+eVHb0uu0KYQoXkzvu+s Dncuguk470XPnscL27hs8PgOP6QjG4jt75K2LfZ0eAqTOUCZTJxA8A7E9+XTYuU0hs7QVrWJ jQdFxQbRMrYz7uP8KmTK9/Cnvqehgl4EzyRaZppshruKMeyheBgvgJd5On1wWq4ZUV5PFM4x II3QbD3EJfWbaJMR55jI9dMFa+vK7MFz3rhWOkEx/QR959lfdRSTXdxs8V3zDvChcmRVGN8U Vo93d1YNtWnA9w6oCW1dnDZ4kgQZZSBIjp6iHcA08apzh7DPi08jL7M9UQByeYGr8KuR4i6e RZI6xhlZerUScVzn35ONwOC91VdYiQgjemiVLq1WDDZ3B7DIzUZ4RQTOaIWdtXBWb8zWakt/ ztGhsx0e39Gvt3391O1PgcA7ilhvqrBPemJrlb9xSPPRbaNAW39P8ws/UJnzSJqnHMVxbRZC Am4add/SM+OCP0w3xYss1jy9T+XdZa0lhUvJfLy7tNcjVG/sxkBXOaSC24MFPuwnoC9WvCVQ ZBxouph3kqc4Dt5X1EeXVLeba+466P1fe1rC8MbcwDkoUo65Ag0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAGJAiUEGAECAA8FAlXLn5ECGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1qA6w/+M+ggFv+JdVsz5+ZIc6MSyGUozASX+bmIuPeIecc9UsFRatc91LuJCKMkD9Uv GOcWSeFpLrSGRQ1Z7EMzFVU//qVs6uzhsNk0RYMyS0B6oloW3FpyQ+zOVylFWQCzoyyf227y GW8HnXunJSC+4PtlL2AY4yZjAVAPLK2l6mhgClVXTQ/S7cBoTQKP+jvVJOoYkpnFxWE9pn4t H5QIFk7Ip8TKr5k3fXVWk4lnUi9MTF/5L/mWqdyIO1s7cjharQCstfWCzWrVeVctpVoDfJWp 4LwTuQ5yEM2KcPeElLg5fR7WB2zH97oI6/Ko2DlovmfQqXh9xWozQt0iGy5tWzh6I0JrlcxJ ileZWLccC4XKD1037Hy2FLAjzfoWgwBLA6ULu0exOOdIa58H4PsXtkFPrUF980EEibUp0zFz GotRVekFAceUaRvAj7dh76cToeZkfsjAvBVb4COXuhgX6N4pofgNkW2AtgYu1nUsPAo+NftU CxrhjHtLn4QEBpkbErnXQyMjHpIatlYGutVMS91XTQXYydCh5crMPs7hYVsvnmGHIaB9ZMfB njnuI31KBiLUks+paRkHQlFcgS2N3gkRBzH7xSZ+t7Re3jvXdXEzKBbQ+dC3lpJB0wPnyMcX FOTT3aZT7IgePkt5iC/BKBk3hqKteTnJFeVIT7EC+a6YUFg= Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: <8fdcbfc6-3e58-8970-416f-4039bb151394@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:13:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200203131957.383915-9-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org [...] > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_S390_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_HOST > +static int kvm_s390_handle_pv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_pv_cmd *cmd) > +{ > + int r =3D 0; > + void __user *argp =3D (void __user *)cmd->data; > + > + switch (cmd->cmd) { > + case KVM_PV_VM_CREATE: { > + r =3D -EINVAL; > + if (kvm_s390_pv_is_protected(kvm)) > + break; > + > + r =3D kvm_s390_pv_alloc_vm(kvm); > + if (r) > + break; > + > + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); > + kvm_s390_vcpu_block_all(kvm); > + /* FMT 4 SIE needs esca */ > + r =3D sca_switch_to_extended(kvm); > + if (!r) > + r =3D kvm_s390_pv_create_vm(kvm); > + kvm_s390_vcpu_unblock_all(kvm); > + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); > + break; > + } I think KVM_PV_VM_ENABLE/KVM_PV_VM_DISABLE would be a better fit. You're not creating/deleting VMs, aren't you? All you're doing is allocating some data and performing some kind of a mode switch. [...] > VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "create cpu %d at 0x%pK, sie block at 0x%pK", id, vc= pu, > vcpu->arch.sie_block); > trace_kvm_s390_create_vcpu(id, vcpu, vcpu->arch.sie_block); > @@ -4353,6 +4502,37 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl(struct file *filp= , > return -ENOIOCTLCMD; > } > =20 > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_S390_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_HOST > +static int kvm_s390_handle_pv_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + struct kvm_pv_cmd *cmd) > +{ > + int r =3D 0; > + > + if (!kvm_s390_pv_is_protected(vcpu->kvm)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + switch (cmd->cmd) { > + case KVM_PV_VCPU_CREATE: { > + if (kvm_s390_pv_handle_cpu(vcpu)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + r =3D kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu(vcpu); > + break; > + } > + case KVM_PV_VCPU_DESTROY: { > + if (!kvm_s390_pv_handle_cpu(vcpu)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + r =3D kvm_s390_pv_destroy_cpu(vcpu); > + break; > + } > + default: > + r =3D -ENOTTY; > + } > + return r; > +} I asked this already and didn't get an answer (lost in the flood of comments :) ) Can't we simply convert all VCPUs via KVM_PV_VM_CREATE and destoy them via KVM_PV_VM_DESTROY? Then you can easily handle hotplug as well in the kernel when a new VCPU is created and PV is active - oh and I see you are already doing that in kvm_arch_vcpu_create(). So that screams for doing either this a) completely triggered by user space or b) completely in the kernel. I prefer the latter. One interface less required. I would assume that no VCPU is allowed to be running inside KVM while performing the PV switch, which would make this even easier. --=20 Thanks, David / dhildenb