From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Add more protection against undefined behavior in rsvd_bits()
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:34:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <947f0e1a-c8db-5c68-1e0c-abadd10d92fc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210113204515.3473079-1-seanjc@google.com>
On 13/01/21 21:45, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Add compile-time asserts in rsvd_bits() to guard against KVM passing in
> garbage hardcoded values, and cap the upper bound at '63' for dynamic
> values to prevent generating a mask that would overflow a u64.
>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> index 581925e476d6..261be1d2032b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> @@ -44,8 +44,15 @@
> #define PT32_ROOT_LEVEL 2
> #define PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL 3
>
> -static inline u64 rsvd_bits(int s, int e)
> +static __always_inline u64 rsvd_bits(int s, int e)
> {
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(e) && __builtin_constant_p(s) && e < s);
> +
> + if (__builtin_constant_p(e))
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(e > 63);
> + else
> + e &= 63;
> +
> if (e < s)
> return 0;
>
>
Queued for 5.11, thanks.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-13 20:45 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Add more protection against undefined behavior in rsvd_bits() Sean Christopherson
2021-01-18 17:34 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=947f0e1a-c8db-5c68-1e0c-abadd10d92fc@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).