kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] selftests: KVM: Test offset-based counter controls
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 18:43:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9982d53a-8160-d7f7-09eb-ea640f99136b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210916181555.973085-1-oupton@google.com>

On 16/09/21 20:15, Oliver Upton wrote:
> This series implements new tests for the x86 and arm64 counter migration
> changes that I've mailed out. These are sent separately as a dependent
> change since there are cross-arch dependencies here.
> 
> Patch 1 yanks the pvclock headers into the tools/ directory so we can
> make use of them within a KVM selftest guest.
> 
> Patch 2 tests the new capabilities of the KVM_*_CLOCK ioctls, ensuring
> that the kernel accounts for elapsed time when restoring the KVM clock.
> 
> Patches 3-4 add some device attribute helpers and clean up some mistakes
> in the assertions thereof.
> 
> Patch 5 implements a test for the KVM_VCPU_TSC_OFFSET attribute,
> asserting that manipulation of the offset results in correct TSC values
> within the guest.
> 
> Patch 6 adds basic arm64 support to the counter offset test, checking
> that the virtual counter-timer offset works correctly. Patch 7 does the
> same for the physical counter-timer offset.
> 
> Patch 8 adds a benchmark for physical counter offsetting, since most
> implementations available right now will rely on emulation.
> 
> Lastly, patch 9 extends the get-reg-list test to check for
> KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_OFFSET if userspace opts-in to the kernel capability.
> 
> This series applies cleanly to 5.15-rc1
> 
> Tests were ran against the respective architecture changes on the
> following systems:
> 
>   - Haswell (x86)
>   - Ampere Mt. Jade (non-ECV, nVHE and VHE)

Queued patches 1-5, thanks.

Paolo

> v7: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210816001246.3067312-1-oupton@google.com
> 
> v7 -> v8:
>   - Rebased to 5.15-rc1
>   - Dropped helper for checking if reg exists in reg list (no longer
>     necessary)
>   - Test and enable KVM_CAP_ARM_VTIMER_OFFSET
>   - Add get-reg-list changes
> 
> Oliver Upton (9):
>    tools: arch: x86: pull in pvclock headers
>    selftests: KVM: Add test for KVM_{GET,SET}_CLOCK
>    selftests: KVM: Fix kvm device helper ioctl assertions
>    selftests: KVM: Add helpers for vCPU device attributes
>    selftests: KVM: Introduce system counter offset test
>    selftests: KVM: Add support for aarch64 to system_counter_offset_test
>    selftests: KVM: Test physical counter offsetting
>    selftests: KVM: Add counter emulation benchmark
>    selftests: KVM: Test vtimer offset reg in get-reg-list
> 
>   tools/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h      |  48 ++++
>   tools/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h          | 103 ++++++++
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore        |   3 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   4 +
>   .../kvm/aarch64/counter_emulation_benchmark.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++
>   .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c      |  42 ++++
>   .../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h |  24 ++
>   .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h  |  11 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c    |  44 +++-
>   .../kvm/system_counter_offset_test.c          | 220 ++++++++++++++++++
>   .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvm_clock_test.c     | 204 ++++++++++++++++
>   11 files changed, 907 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 tools/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h
>   create mode 100644 tools/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/counter_emulation_benchmark.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/system_counter_offset_test.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvm_clock_test.c
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-24 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16 18:15 [PATCH v8 0/9] selftests: KVM: Test offset-based counter controls Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] tools: arch: x86: pull in pvclock headers Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] selftests: KVM: Add test for KVM_{GET,SET}_CLOCK Oliver Upton
2021-10-05  6:51   ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] selftests: KVM: Fix kvm device helper ioctl assertions Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] selftests: KVM: Add helpers for vCPU device attributes Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] selftests: KVM: Introduce system counter offset test Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] selftests: KVM: Add support for aarch64 to system_counter_offset_test Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] selftests: KVM: Test physical counter offsetting Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] selftests: KVM: Add counter emulation benchmark Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] selftests: KVM: Test vtimer offset reg in get-reg-list Oliver Upton
2021-09-20 12:28   ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-24 16:43 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-10-05  8:58 ` [PATCH v8 0/9] selftests: KVM: Test offset-based counter controls Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9982d53a-8160-d7f7-09eb-ea640f99136b@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).