kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
	david@redhat.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com,
	mimu@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] vfio: ap: register IOMMU VFIO notifier
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:14:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9af30e31-e4d8-160e-d7a1-8365185d2933@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a4bf9f1-5046-5838-a50d-8402782c880f@linux.ibm.com>

On 3/29/19 5:31 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 28/03/2019 21:46, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> On 3/22/19 10:43 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> To be able to use the VFIO interface to facilitate the
>>> mediated device memory pinning/unpinning we need to register
>>> a notifier for IOMMU.
>>>
>>> While we will start to pin one guest page for the interrupt indicator
>>> byte, this is still ok with ballooning as this page will never be
>>> used by the guest virtio-balloon driver.
>>> So the pinned page will never be freed. And even a broken guest does
>>> so, that would not impact the host as the original page is still
>>> in control by vfio.
>>
>> I apologize, but I do not understand what you are saying in the second
>> sentence of the paragraph above. Why will the pinned page never be freed?
> Because it is in use by the guest's kernel as a notification information 
> byte for the original PQAP AQIC.

Your comment says the pinned page will never be free, doesn't it get
freed when the guest is terminated?

> 
>   I understand that the pinned page is under the control of vfio
>> until it is freed, but have no idea what you mean by "and even a broken
>> guest does so"? A broken guest does what? Can you please reword this so
>> it makes more sense?
> 
> A broken guest could free the page used for the NIB. What is obviously 
> wrong.

Then why not simply say a pinned page is under the control of the
vfio driver, so if a broken (malicious?) guest frees the page, it will
not impact the host or something to that effect.

> 
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c     | 38 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h |  2 ++
>>>   2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c 
>>> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>>> index bdb36e0..3478499 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
>>> @@ -787,6 +787,35 @@ static const struct attribute_group 
>>> *vfio_ap_mdev_attr_groups[] = {
>>>       NULL
>>>   };
>>> +/**
>>> + * vfio_ap_mdev_iommu_notifier: IOMMU notifier callback
>>> + *
>>> + * @nb: The notifier block
>>> + * @action: Action to be taken
>>> + * @data: data associated with the request
>>> + *
>>> + * For an UNMAP request, unpin the guest IOVA (the NIB guest address we
>>> + * pinned before). Other requests are ignored.
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_iommu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>> +                       unsigned long action, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
>>> +
>>> +    matrix_mdev = container_of(nb, struct ap_matrix_mdev, 
>>> iommu_notifier);
>>> +
>>
>> I don't understand why we registered this notifier. I may be wrong, but
>> AFAIU, this notifier will be invoked only when the VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA
>> ioctl is called from userspace. I did an experiment and inserted some
>> printf's to see if this ever gets called and verified it does not. Maybe
>> you have a good reason of which I'm not aware. Can you enlighten me
>> here?
> 
> The vfio_iommu_type1 pin page requires a notifier.
> 
> Regards,
> Pierre
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-29 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-22 14:43 [PATCH v6 0/7] vfio: ap: AP Queue Interrupt Control Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] s390: ap: kvm: add PQAP interception for AQIC Pierre Morel
2019-03-26 18:57   ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-27 16:06     ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 12:43     ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 15:24       ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 16:12   ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-29  8:52     ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-29 13:02       ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] s390: ap: new vfio_ap_queue structure Pierre Morel
2019-03-25  8:05   ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-03-28 13:12     ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-26 20:45   ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-27 11:00     ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-03-28 12:53       ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 13:06     ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 15:32       ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 16:06         ` Pierre Morel
2019-04-02 12:47   ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] s390: ap: setup relation betwen KVM and mediated device Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 16:12   ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-28 16:27     ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 17:25       ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-29  8:58         ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-29 13:06           ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] vfio: ap: register IOMMU VFIO notifier Pierre Morel
2019-03-28 20:46   ` Tony Krowiak
2019-03-29  9:31     ` Pierre Morel
2019-03-29 13:14       ` Tony Krowiak [this message]
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] s390: ap: implement PAPQ AQIC interception in kernel Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] s390: ap: Cleanup on removing the AP device Pierre Morel
2019-03-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] s390: ap: kvm: Enable PQAP/AQIC facility for the guest Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9af30e31-e4d8-160e-d7a1-8365185d2933@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).