kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 02/14] iommufd: Add iommufd_group
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 07:55:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB52768565CB65BCACA4E3808E8CB29@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2-v1-7612f88c19f5+2f21-iommufd_alloc_jgg@nvidia.com>

> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2023 8:28 AM
> 
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * All objects using a group reference must put it before their destroy
> +	 * completes
> +	 */
> +	new_igroup->ictx = ictx;

Looks the comment is not related to the code. Probably put it in the
destroy function?

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We dropped the lock so igroup is invalid. Assume that the
> +	 * xa had NULL in it, if this guess is wrong then we will obtain
> +	 * the actual value under lock and try again once.

this reads like "if this guess is wrong" is checked outside of the lock.
I'd just remove "under lock".

> +	 */
> +	cur_igroup = NULL;
> +	xa_lock(&ictx->groups);
> +	while (true) {
> +		igroup = __xa_cmpxchg(&ictx->groups, id, cur_igroup,
> new_igroup,
> +				      GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (xa_is_err(igroup)) {
> +			xa_unlock(&ictx->groups);
> +			iommufd_put_group(new_igroup);
> +			return ERR_PTR(xa_err(igroup));
> +		}
> +
> +		/* new_group was successfully installed */
> +		if (cur_igroup == igroup) {
> +			xa_unlock(&ictx->groups);
> +			return new_igroup;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Check again if the current group is any good */
> +		if (igroup && igroup->group == group &&
> +		    kref_get_unless_zero(&igroup->ref)) {
> +			xa_unlock(&ictx->groups);
> +			iommufd_put_group(new_igroup);
> +			return igroup;
> +		}
> +		cur_igroup = igroup;
> +	}

Add a WARN_ON(igroup->group != group). The only valid race should
be when an existing group which is created by another device in the
same iommu group is being destroyed then we want another try
hoping that object will be removed from xarray soon. But there should
not be a case with the same slot pointing to a different iommu group.

> @@ -98,7 +195,7 @@ struct iommufd_device *iommufd_device_bind(struct
> iommufd_ctx *ictx,
>  	/* The calling driver is a user until iommufd_device_unbind() */
>  	refcount_inc(&idev->obj.users);
>  	/* group refcount moves into iommufd_device */
> -	idev->group = group;
> +	idev->igroup = igroup;

the comment about group refcount is stale now.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-02  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-25  0:27 [PATCH 00/14] Add iommufd physical device operations for replace and alloc hwpt Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 01/14] iommufd: Move isolated msi enforcement to iommufd_device_bind() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-02  7:45   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 02/14] iommufd: Add iommufd_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-02  7:55   ` Tian, Kevin [this message]
2023-03-02 12:51     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-03  2:13       ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-06 19:16         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-07  2:32           ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 03/14] iommufd: Replace the hwpt->devices list with iommufd_group Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-02  8:01   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-06 20:22     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-07  2:38       ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-07 13:53         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08  7:29           ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08 19:00             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 04/14] iommufd: Use the iommufd_group to avoid duplicate reserved groups and msi setup Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-02  8:06   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-02 12:55     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-03  2:16       ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 05/14] iommufd: Make sw_msi_start a group global Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-02  8:09   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-06 20:27     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 06/14] iommufd: Move putting a hwpt to a helper function Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-02  8:12   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-06 20:29     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 07/14] iommufd: Add enforced_cache_coherency to iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-02  8:14   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 08/14] iommu: Introduce a new iommu_group_replace_domain() API Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-02  8:16   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 09/14] iommufd: Add iommufd_device_replace() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-26  3:01   ` Baolu Lu
2023-02-27 13:58     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-28  1:50       ` Baolu Lu
2023-02-28 13:51         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-01  1:55           ` Baolu Lu
2023-02-26  3:13   ` Baolu Lu
2023-02-27 14:00     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-28  2:10       ` Baolu Lu
2023-02-28 13:52         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-01  2:23           ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-02  8:20   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-06 20:44     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-07  2:42       ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-07 13:54         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 10/14] iommufd: Make destroy_rwsem use a lock class per object type Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 11/14] iommufd/selftest: Test iommufd_device_replace() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 12/14] iommufd: Add IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-06  1:42   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-03-06 20:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-17  3:02   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-17  4:02     ` Nicolin Chen
2023-03-17 10:20       ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-21 17:16     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 13/14] iommufd/selftest: Return the real idev id from selftest mock_domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-25  0:27 ` [PATCH 14/14] iommufd/selftest: Add a selftest for IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-26 19:29   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-27 15:02     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-28  0:17       ` Nicolin Chen
2023-03-07  8:42 ` [PATCH 00/14] Add iommufd physical device operations for replace and alloc hwpt Tian, Kevin
2023-03-07 12:46   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-03-08  2:08     ` Baolu Lu
2023-03-08  7:38       ` Tian, Kevin
2023-03-08 18:59         ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BN9PR11MB52768565CB65BCACA4E3808E8CB29@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).