From: Zixuan Wang <zxwang42@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Zixuan Wang <zixuanwang@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, drjones@redhat.com,
Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>,
"Hyunwook (Wooky) Baek" <baekhw@google.com>,
tmroeder@google.com, erdemaktas@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
seanjc@google.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com,
Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com, varad.gautam@suse.com, jroedel@suse.de,
bp@suse.de
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 14/17] x86 AMD SEV-ES: Load GDT with UEFI segments
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 21:41:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEDJ5ZQEcmV8d_YXyV-7c6u1Q7FTGSY7esw-08vYyYzoNfLVsg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34173c4c-d704-5d28-8aac-c2debf224a86@redhat.com>
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 6:27 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 27/08/21 05:12, Zixuan Wang wrote:
> > + *
> > + * This is because KVM-Unit-Tests reuses UEFI #VC handler that requires UEFI
> > + * code and data segments to run. The UEFI #VC handler crashes the guest VM if
> > + * these segments are not available. So we need to copy these two UEFI segments
> > + * into KVM-Unit-Tests GDT.
> > + *
> > + * UEFI uses 0x30 as code segment and 0x38 as data segment. Fortunately, these
> > + * segments can be safely overridden in KVM-Unit-Tests as they are used as
> > + * protected mode and real mode segments (see x86/efi/efistart64.S for more
> > + * details), which are not used in EFI set up process.
>
> Is 0x30/0x38 the same as kvm-unit-tests's 0x08/0x10? Can kvm-unit-tests
> simply change its ring-0 64-bit CS/DS to 0x30 and 0x38 instead of 0x08
> and 0x10? I can help with that too, since there would be some more
> shuffling to keep similar descriptors together:
>
> * 0x00 NULL descriptor NULL descriptor
> * 0x08 intr_alt_stack TSS ring-0 code segment (32-bit)
> * 0x10 (0x13) **unused** ring-3 code segment (64-bit)
> * 0x18 ring-0 code segment (P=0) ring-0 code segment (64-bit, P=0)
> * 0x20 ring-0 code segment (16-bit) same
> * 0x28 ring-0 data segment (16-bit) same
> * 0x30 ring-0 code segment (32-bit) ring-0 code segment (64-bit)
> * 0x38 ring-0 data segment (32-bit) ring-0 data segment (32/64-bit)
> * 0x40 (0x43) ring-3 code segment (32-bit) same
> * 0x48 (0x4b) ring-3 data segment (32-bit) ring-3 data segment (32/64-bit)
> * 0x50-0x78 free to use for test cases same
>
> or:
>
> old new
> ---- ----
> 0x00 0x00
> 0x20 0x08
> 0x48 0x10
> 0x18 0x18
> 0x28 0x20
> 0x30 0x28
> 0x08 0x30
> 0x10 0x38
> 0x38 0x40
> 0x40 0x48
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
Thank you for the detailed explanation! Updating KVM-unit-tests GDT is
one way to solve the problem, but we found a more straightforward
solution [1]:
We found it possible to update the 'code segment selector' field in
the #VC IDT entry and point it to the KVM-unit-tests code segment.
This allows the UEFI #VC handler to use KVM-unit-tests segments, and
we do not need to copy the UEFI segments.
I will update this into the next version.
[1] https://github.com/TheNetAdmin/KVM-Unit-Tests-dev-fork/commit/ab480fd0fbad813c2922526a0bccadf121cb9240
Best regards,
Zixuan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-21 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-27 3:12 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 00/17] x86_64 UEFI and AMD SEV/SEV-ES support Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 01/17] x86 UEFI: Copy code from Linux Zixuan Wang
2021-09-20 14:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-21 3:58 ` Zixuan Wang
2021-09-21 6:37 ` Varad Gautam
2021-09-21 16:33 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-22 20:10 ` Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 02/17] x86 UEFI: Implement UEFI function calls Zixuan Wang
2021-09-21 16:43 ` Andrew Jones
2021-09-22 20:17 ` Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 03/17] x86 UEFI: Copy code from GNU-EFI Zixuan Wang
2021-10-04 12:44 ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-04 22:09 ` Zixuan Wang
2021-10-05 5:58 ` Andrew Jones
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 04/17] x86 UEFI: Boot from UEFI Zixuan Wang
2021-10-04 12:55 ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-04 21:30 ` Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 05/17] x86 UEFI: Load IDT after UEFI boot up Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 06/17] x86 UEFI: Load GDT and TSS " Zixuan Wang
2021-09-20 15:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-21 4:15 ` Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 07/17] x86 UEFI: Set up memory allocator Zixuan Wang
2021-10-04 13:06 ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-04 21:43 ` Zixuan Wang
2021-10-05 6:05 ` Andrew Jones
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 08/17] x86 UEFI: Set up RSDP after UEFI boot up Zixuan Wang
2021-10-04 13:21 ` Andrew Jones
2021-10-04 21:58 ` Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 09/17] x86 UEFI: Set up page tables Zixuan Wang
2021-09-20 15:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-21 4:31 ` Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 10/17] x86 UEFI: Convert x86 test cases to PIC Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 11/17] x86 AMD SEV: Initial support Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 14:51 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-31 19:36 ` Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 12/17] x86 AMD SEV: Page table with c-bit Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 13/17] x86 AMD SEV-ES: Check SEV-ES status Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 14:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-08-31 19:38 ` Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 14/17] x86 AMD SEV-ES: Load GDT with UEFI segments Zixuan Wang
2021-09-20 16:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-21 4:41 ` Zixuan Wang [this message]
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 15/17] x86 AMD SEV-ES: Copy UEFI #VC IDT entry Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 16/17] x86 AMD SEV-ES: Set up GHCB page Zixuan Wang
2021-08-27 3:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 17/17] x86 AMD SEV-ES: Add test cases Zixuan Wang
2021-10-04 13:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 00/17] x86_64 UEFI and AMD SEV/SEV-ES support Andrew Jones
2021-10-04 20:54 ` Zixuan Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEDJ5ZQEcmV8d_YXyV-7c6u1Q7FTGSY7esw-08vYyYzoNfLVsg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=zxwang42@gmail.com \
--cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=baekhw@google.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcorr@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tmroeder@google.com \
--cc=varad.gautam@suse.com \
--cc=zixuanwang@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).