From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136A2C433DF for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E377320814 for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="eoqCHD/0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728575AbgEULFM (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2020 07:05:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51292 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728348AbgEULFL (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2020 07:05:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com (mail-wr1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::443]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34019C061A0E; Thu, 21 May 2020 04:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id l18so6247294wrn.6; Thu, 21 May 2020 04:05:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0kOWfagYaxm33AGZcA1CpvfNn7HWE5+JvpuvxfP/z54=; b=eoqCHD/0uMiOw3qgaN7N4QZPdhvb/P2BiPUskhLmWsGZK66FilVFjjUhf0q3VF0dY8 aS+Xg9hy81A6LfdW207F3V9eDhFWayFXbWSLKyEk1B+5mzPDMUe0RverKiLSTvsvUPKy hECRT0UhKwWWATTnX26xGHqY/k+iO0Jn8wnfgqDTzMlxN23FHuJQzJ48dp8zh1mkXEmy oekBNs5wSPrtaQBQiaNwjE66lRczYOzGNqrtN8dhfoXhOVqRjJmhREd7reCw/o5HLU7l a2ypqQuGrwZAN3RIg9oOyiW4cUurSxmg/+FX4JPEWc7VY0L1fxRlISQu16UREduYbu96 /r2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0kOWfagYaxm33AGZcA1CpvfNn7HWE5+JvpuvxfP/z54=; b=bQFAQjKOhfJcaWJPBIyXCjjI0Bu98Doqp0MNaKMrXliC5SfjdT6jsNpoE6nF5BMwrA /UY5BDzGICyb348h4b4whbw/rTQOfFIK2hXSaCzRBknll+LcoL064vzlnTXpLNB5Qd1Y DoEPo8/EqiJv5wWJInWrva3KFtlJDorLhc5XbSgvKuOagy2lW7dQhWdhP8HsHYQAT9ex 0y8SPUzpFSK4AsDo478YQ4BWkk0u8hNgG3Drt/eQH1ettdxyZ6hhysrSRCXQadPgMi9u hqEiNFB6APXSttj1KDWIa3UQPrPFRaG+5KoyIIim+1V0Sys+3JzkFeNRg5ebKgB1knfI h7mQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321dOunzO/c9Rjyfjp1DRrYX3LIAXLCUy5Nns7sR8P4m+gxpwlz Xnfs24Yy296/wCdfHuZ3VNJEmpRWU84HvuI8Wck= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmDJFt2wt5d0VyfLFJJKwwRxN/ZxsaG5OeRNUHphLk+LjBf5oyUeS2ljeHjl50kWsRDkXvvFetScmDdEqT+J0= X-Received: by 2002:adf:dc50:: with SMTP id m16mr8092867wrj.329.1590059108830; Thu, 21 May 2020 04:05:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1589688372-3098-1-git-send-email-chenhc@lemote.com> <1589688372-3098-16-git-send-email-chenhc@lemote.com> <20200517082242.GA3939@alpha.franken.de> In-Reply-To: From: Aleksandar Markovic Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 13:04:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 15/15] MAINTAINERS: Update KVM/MIPS maintainers To: Huacai Chen Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , Paolo Bonzini , kvm , "open list:MIPS" , Fuxin Zhang , Jiaxun Yang Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org > I'm sorry for the late response. These days I'm attempting to collect > some maintainers' PGP signatures, in order to get a kernel.org > account. So, I think we can keep the lemote.com address in MAINTAINERS > now, and update to the kernel.org address when I succeed. > I agree. E-mail address can be easily changed later. I think it is reasonable that minor email tech problems should not stop this series. I gather that at least approximate consensus is that v6 is "good to go". While I am at this series, I just want to let everybody that there is a long-standing practice in QEMU for MIPS that we don't upstream changes that depend on kernel support that is not yet upstreamed in kernel - and I want to keep that practice in future (and not limited to KVM, but for all kernel/QEMU interdependant code). In other words, corresponding Huacai's changes in QEMU will be kept on hold as long as this series is still not upstreamed in kernel. But, that was the original Huacai's plan anyway. Many thanks to everyone involved! Aleksandar > Regards, > Huacai