kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Raslan KarimAllah <karahmed@amazon.de>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] cpuidle haltpoll driver and governor (v6)
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:32:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jU4MC9j+qWpmZrD86YMS8iKO-m8c94N_MuX1nYrSEmRg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190703235124.783034907@amt.cnet>

On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:59 AM Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> (rebased against queue branch of kvm.git tree)
>
> The cpuidle-haltpoll driver with haltpoll governor allows the guest
> vcpus to poll for a specified amount of time before halting.
> This provides the following benefits to host side polling:
>
>          1) The POLL flag is set while polling is performed, which allows
>             a remote vCPU to avoid sending an IPI (and the associated
>             cost of handling the IPI) when performing a wakeup.
>
>          2) The VM-exit cost can be avoided.
>
> The downside of guest side polling is that polling is performed
> even with other runnable tasks in the host.
>
> Results comparing halt_poll_ns and server/client application
> where a small packet is ping-ponged:
>
> host                                        --> 31.33
> halt_poll_ns=300000 / no guest busy spin    --> 33.40   (93.8%)
> halt_poll_ns=0 / guest_halt_poll_ns=300000  --> 32.73   (95.7%)
>
> For the SAP HANA benchmarks (where idle_spin is a parameter
> of the previous version of the patch, results should be the
> same):
>
> hpns == halt_poll_ns
>
>                            idle_spin=0/   idle_spin=800/    idle_spin=0/
>                            hpns=200000    hpns=0            hpns=800000
> DeleteC06T03 (100 thread) 1.76           1.71 (-3%)        1.78   (+1%)
> InsertC16T02 (100 thread) 2.14           2.07 (-3%)        2.18   (+1.8%)
> DeleteC00T01 (1 thread)   1.34           1.28 (-4.5%)      1.29   (-3.7%)
> UpdateC00T03 (1 thread)   4.72           4.18 (-12%)       4.53   (-5%)
>
> V2:
>
> - Move from x86 to generic code (Paolo/Christian)
> - Add auto-tuning logic (Paolo)
> - Add MSR to disable host side polling (Paolo)
>
> V3:
>
> - Do not be specific about HLT VM-exit in the documentation (Ankur Arora)
> - Mark tuning parameters static and __read_mostly (Andrea Arcangeli)
> - Add WARN_ON if host does not support poll control (Joao Martins)
> - Use sched_clock and cleanup haltpoll_enter_idle (Peter Zijlstra)
> - Mark certain functions in kvm.c as static (kernel test robot)
> - Remove tracepoints as they use RCU from extended quiescent state (kernel
> test robot)
>
> V4:
> - Use a haltpoll governor, use poll_state.c poll code (Rafael J. Wysocki)
>
> V5:
> - Take latency requirement into consideration (Rafael J. Wysocki)
> - Set target_residency/exit_latency to 1 (Rafael J. Wysocki)
> - Do not load cpuidle driver if not virtualized (Rafael J. Wysocki)
>
> V6:
> - Switch from callback to poll_limit_ns variable in cpuidle device structure
> (Rafael J. Wysocki)
> - Move last_used_idx to cpuidle device structure (Rafael J. Wysocki)
> - Drop per-cpu device structure in haltpoll governor (Rafael J. Wysocki)

It looks good to me now, but I have some cpuidle changes in the work
that will clash in some changes in this series if not rebased on top
of it, so IMO it would make sense for me to get patches [1-4/5] at
least into my queue.  I can expose an immutable branch with them for
the KVM tree to consume.  I can take the last patch in the series as
well if I get an ACK for it.

Would that work for everybody?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-04  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-03 23:51 [patch 0/5] cpuidle haltpoll driver and governor (v6) Marcelo Tosatti
2019-07-03 23:51 ` [patch 1/5] add cpuidle-haltpoll driver Marcelo Tosatti
2019-07-04  9:16   ` Joao Martins
2019-07-04 11:13     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2019-07-03 23:51 ` [patch 2/5] cpuidle: add poll_limit_ns to cpuidle_device structure Marcelo Tosatti
2019-07-03 23:51 ` [patch 3/5] governors: unify last_state_idx Marcelo Tosatti
2019-07-03 23:51 ` [patch 4/5] cpuidle: add haltpoll governor Marcelo Tosatti
2019-07-03 23:51 ` [patch 5/5] cpuidle-haltpoll: disable host side polling when kvm virtualized Marcelo Tosatti
2019-07-04  8:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-07-22 15:25   ` [patch 0/5] cpuidle haltpoll driver and governor (v6) Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0jU4MC9j+qWpmZrD86YMS8iKO-m8c94N_MuX1nYrSEmRg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).