kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Tarun Gupta <targupta@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] vfio/mdev: Allow the mdev_parent_ops to specify the device driver to bind
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:56:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4g=MFtZMVZPn8AtTX6NyweF25nuFNVBu7pg_QSP+EGE+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210428060300.GA4092@lst.de>

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:04 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 05:00:04PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * mdev drivers can refuse to bind during probe(), in this case we want to fail
> > + * the creation of the mdev all the way back to sysfs. This is a weird model
> > + * that doesn't fit in the driver core well, nor does it seem to appear any
> > + * place else in the kernel, so use a simple hack.
> > + */
> > +static int mdev_bind_driver(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> > +{
> > +     struct mdev_driver *drv = mdev->type->parent->ops->device_driver;
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     if (!drv)
> > +             drv = &vfio_mdev_driver;
> > +
> > +     while (1) {
> > +             device_lock(&mdev->dev);
> > +             if (mdev->dev.driver == &drv->driver) {
> > +                     ret = 0;
> > +                     goto out_unlock;
> > +             }
> > +             if (mdev->probe_err) {
> > +                     ret = mdev->probe_err;
> > +                     goto out_unlock;
> > +             }
> > +             device_unlock(&mdev->dev);
> > +             ret = device_attach(&mdev->dev);
> > +             if (ret)
> > +                     return ret;
> > +             mdev->probe_err = -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +     return 0;
> > +
> > +out_unlock:
> > +     device_unlock(&mdev->dev);
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
>
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_driver.c
> > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int mdev_probe(struct device *dev)
> >               return ret;
> >
> >       if (drv->probe) {
> > -             ret = drv->probe(mdev);
> > +             ret = mdev->probe_err = drv->probe(mdev);
> >               if (ret)
> >                       mdev_detach_iommu(mdev);
> >       }
>
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int mdev_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> > +{
> > +     struct mdev_device *mdev = to_mdev_device(dev);
> > +     struct mdev_driver *target = mdev->type->parent->ops->device_driver;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * The ops specify the device driver to connect, fall back to the old
> > +      * shim driver if the driver hasn't been converted.
> > +      */
> > +     if (!target)
> > +             target = &vfio_mdev_driver;
> > +     return drv == &target->driver;
> > +}
>
> I still think this going the wrong way.  Why can't we enhance the core
> driver code with a version of device_bind_driver() that does call into
> ->probe?  That probably seems like a better model for those existing
> direct users of device_bind_driver or device_attach with a pre-set
> ->drv anyway.

Wouldn't that just be "export device_driver_attach()" so that drivers
can implement their own custom bind implementation?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-28  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-26 20:00 [PATCH v2 00/13] Remove vfio_mdev.c, mdev_parent_ops and more Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] vfio/mdev: Remove CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 11:05   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] vfio/mdev: Allow the mdev_parent_ops to specify the device driver to bind Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 12:32   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-27 23:20     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28  6:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-28  7:56     ` Dan Williams [this message]
2021-04-28 12:41       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-28 14:00         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28 19:58           ` Dan Williams
2021-04-28 23:38             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-29  0:00               ` Dave Jiang
2021-05-26  0:42             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-26  1:42               ` Dan Williams
2021-05-27 11:44               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 14:53                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-27 15:13                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-29  6:51           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-04  9:36           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-04 11:30             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28  6:44   ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-28 14:14     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28 14:24       ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] vfio/mtty: Convert to use vfio_register_group_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] vfio/mdpy: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] vfio/mbochs: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] vfio/ccw: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 20:06   ` Eric Farman
2021-04-27 22:10     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28 12:55       ` Eric Farman
2021-04-28 13:21         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28 17:09   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-28 17:20     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-29 11:58       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-29 18:13         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-30 12:31           ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-30 17:19             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-03 10:54               ` s390 common I/O layer locking (was: [PATCH v2 07/13] vfio/ccw: Convert to use vfio_register_group_dev()) Cornelia Huck
2021-05-04 15:10                 ` s390 common I/O layer locking Vineeth Vijayan
2021-07-24 13:24                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-03 14:27                     ` Vineeth Vijayan
2021-08-10 15:00                       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] vfio/mdev: Remove vfio_mdev.c Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-28  6:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-28  6:36     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-04-28 12:53       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-29  6:53         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-29  6:56           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-03 17:32             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-04  9:38               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-04 16:20                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] vfio/mdev: Remove mdev_parent_ops dev_attr_groups Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] vfio/mdev: Remove mdev_parent_ops Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] vfio/mdev: Use the driver core to create the 'remove' file Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-26 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] vfio/mdev: Remove mdev drvdata Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] Remove vfio_mdev.c, mdev_parent_ops and more Alex Williamson
2021-04-27 22:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-27 22:49     ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4g=MFtZMVZPn8AtTX6NyweF25nuFNVBu7pg_QSP+EGE+g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).