KVM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@intel.com>,
	"Sun, Yi Y" <yi.y.sun@intel.com>,
	"jean-philippe@linaro.org" <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
	"Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@intel.com>,
	"stefanha@gmail.com" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 07/15] vfio/type1: Add VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST (alloc/free)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:51:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CY4PR11MB14327F25FF2C50778B29B9BEC3660@CY4PR11MB1432.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f78eac88-eb8e-a6f5-d701-146587660f5f@redhat.com>

Hi Eric,

> From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 11:18 PM
> 
> Hi Yi,
> 
> On 7/4/20 1:26 PM, Liu Yi L wrote:
> > This patch allows user space to request PASID allocation/free, e.g. when
> > serving the request from the guest.
> >
> > PASIDs that are not freed by userspace are automatically freed when the
> > IOASID set is destroyed when process exits.
> >
> > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> > CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
> > Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > v3 -> v4:
> > *) address comments from v3, except the below comment against the range
> >    of PASID_FREE request. needs more help on it.
> >     "> +if (req.range.min > req.range.max)
> >
> >     Is it exploitable that a user can spin the kernel for a long time in
> >     the case of a free by calling this with [0, MAX_UINT] regardless of
> >     their actual allocations?"
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > *) move the vfio_mm related code to be a seprate module
> > *) use a single structure for alloc/free, could support a range of PASIDs
> > *) fetch vfio_mm at group_attach time instead of at iommu driver open time
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/Kconfig            |  1 +
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 84
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c       | 10 +++++
> >  include/linux/vfio.h            |  6 +++
> >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       | 36 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > index 3d8a108..95d90c6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> >  config VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1
> >  	tristate
> >  	depends on VFIO
> > +	select VFIO_PASID if (X86)
> >  	default n
> >
> >  config VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > index 80623b8..29726ca 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct vfio_iommu {
> >  	bool				dirty_page_tracking;
> >  	bool				pinned_page_dirty_scope;
> >  	struct iommu_nesting_info	*nesting_info;
> > +	struct vfio_mm			*vmm;
> >  };
> >
> >  struct vfio_domain {
> > @@ -1937,6 +1938,11 @@ static void vfio_iommu_iova_insert_copy(struct
> vfio_iommu *iommu,
> >
> >  static void vfio_iommu_release_nesting_info(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> >  {
> > +	if (iommu->vmm) {
> > +		vfio_mm_put(iommu->vmm);
> > +		iommu->vmm = NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	kfree(iommu->nesting_info);
> >  	iommu->nesting_info = NULL;
> >  }
> > @@ -2075,6 +2081,25 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void
> *iommu_data,
> >  			goto out_detach;
> >  		}
> >  		iommu->nesting_info = info;
> > +
> > +		if (info->features & IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_SYSWIDE_PASID) {
> > +			struct vfio_mm *vmm;
> > +			int sid;
> > +
> > +			vmm = vfio_mm_get_from_task(current);
> > +			if (IS_ERR(vmm)) {
> > +				ret = PTR_ERR(vmm);
> > +				goto out_detach;
> > +			}
> > +			iommu->vmm = vmm;
> > +
> > +			sid = vfio_mm_ioasid_sid(vmm);
> > +			ret = iommu_domain_set_attr(domain->domain,
> > +						    DOMAIN_ATTR_IOASID_SID,
> > +						    &sid);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				goto out_detach;
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >
> >  	/* Get aperture info */
> > @@ -2860,6 +2885,63 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_pages(struct
> vfio_iommu *iommu,
> >  	return -EINVAL;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > +					unsigned int min,
> > +					unsigned int max)
> > +{
> > +	int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > +	if (iommu->vmm)
> > +		ret = vfio_pasid_alloc(iommu->vmm, min, max);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_free(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > +					unsigned int min,
> > +					unsigned int max)
> > +{
> > +	int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > +	if (iommu->vmm) {
> > +		vfio_pasid_free_range(iommu->vmm, min, max);
> > +		ret = 0;
> > +	}
> > +	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > +					  unsigned long arg)
> > +{
> > +	struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request req;
> > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > +
> > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request, range);
> > +
> > +	if (copy_from_user(&req, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> > +		return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +	if (req.argsz < minsz || (req.flags & ~VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (req.range.min > req.range.max)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	switch (req.flags & VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK) {
> > +	case VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID:
> > +		return vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_alloc(iommu,
> > +					req.range.min, req.range.max);
> > +	case VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID:
> > +		return vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_free(iommu,
> > +					req.range.min, req.range.max);
> > +	default:
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> >  				   unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> >  {
> > @@ -2876,6 +2958,8 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> >  		return vfio_iommu_type1_unmap_dma(iommu, arg);
> >  	case VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES:
> >  		return vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_pages(iommu, arg);
> > +	case VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST:
> > +		return vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request(iommu, arg);
> >  	}
> >
> >  	return -ENOTTY;
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> > index c46b870..6f907db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> >  {
> >  	kref_put_mutex(&vmm->kref, vfio_mm_release,
> &vfio_pasid.vfio_mm_lock);
> >  }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_put);
> I think this should be belong to [5/15]

yeah, the implementation is in [5/15], but the user is in this patch, so export
it in this patch.

> >
> >  static void vfio_mm_get(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> >  {
> > @@ -104,6 +105,13 @@ struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm_get_from_task(struct
> task_struct *task)
> >  	mmput(mm);
> >  	return vmm;
> >  }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_get_from_task);
> same

the same with above.

> > +
> > +int vfio_mm_ioasid_sid(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> extern?
> same

why need extern? as it's used in this patch, so add it in this patch.

> > +{
> > +	return vmm->ioasid_sid;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_ioasid_sid);
> >
> >  int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max)
> >  {
> > @@ -113,6 +121,7 @@ int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max)
> >
> >  	return (pasid == INVALID_IOASID) ? -ENOSPC : pasid;
> >  }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pasid_alloc);
> same

same as above reason. :-)

> >
> >  void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
> >  			    ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max)
> > @@ -130,6 +139,7 @@ void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
> >  	for (; pasid <= max; pasid++)
> >  		ioasid_free(pasid);
> >  }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pasid_free_range);
> same

same as above.

> >
> >  static int __init vfio_pasid_init(void)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > index 9da6468..35c922a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct vfio_mm;
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PASID)
> >  extern struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm_get_from_task(struct task_struct *task);
> >  extern void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm);
> > +int vfio_mm_ioasid_sid(struct vfio_mm *vmm);
> >  extern int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max);
> >  extern void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
> >  					ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max);
> > @@ -114,6 +115,11 @@ static inline void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> >  {
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline int vfio_mm_ioasid_sid(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> > +{
> > +	return -ENOTTY;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max)
> >  {
> >  	return -ENOTTY;
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > index 3e3de9c..fe267b8e 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -1169,6 +1169,42 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap_get {
> >
> >  #define VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES             _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 17)
> >
> > +/**
> > + * VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 18,
> > + *				struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request)
> > + *
> > + * PASID (Processor Address Space ID) is a PCIe concept for tagging
> > + * address spaces in DMA requests. When system-wide PASID allocation
> > + * is required by underlying iommu driver (e.g. Intel VT-d), this
> > + * provides an interface for userspace to request pasid alloc/free
> > + * for its assigned devices. Userspace should check the availability
> > + * of this API through VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO.
> name the capability?

yep. will add it.

Regards,
Yi Liu

> > + *
> > + * @flags=VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID, allocate a single PASID within
> @range.
> > + * @flags=VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID, free the PASIDs within @range.
> > + * @range is [min, max], which means both @min and @max are inclusive.
> > + * ALLOC_PASID and FREE_PASID are mutually exclusive.
> > + *
> > + * returns: allocated PASID value on success, -errno on failure for
> > + *	     ALLOC_PASID;
> > + *	     0 for FREE_PASID operation;
> > + */
> > +struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request {
> > +	__u32	argsz;
> > +#define VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID	(1 << 0)
> > +#define VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID	(1 << 1)
> > +	__u32	flags;> +	struct {
> > +		__u32	min;
> > +		__u32	max;
> > +	} range;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK	(VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID | \
> > +					 VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID)
> > +
> > +#define VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST	_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 18)
> > +
> >  /* -------- Additional API for SPAPR TCE (Server POWERPC) IOMMU -------- */
> >
> >  /*
> >
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric


  reply index

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-04 11:26 [PATCH v4 00/15] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs Liu Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] vfio/type1: Refactor vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl() Liu Yi L
2020-07-06  9:34   ` Auger Eric
2020-07-06 12:27     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-06 12:55       ` Auger Eric
2020-07-06 13:00         ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] iommu: Report domain nesting info Liu Yi L
2020-07-06  9:34   ` Auger Eric
2020-07-06 12:20     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-06 13:00       ` Auger Eric
2020-07-06 13:17         ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] iommu/smmu: Report empty " Liu Yi L
2020-07-06 10:37   ` Auger Eric
2020-07-06 12:46     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-06 13:21       ` Auger Eric
2020-07-06 13:26         ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] vfio/type1: Report iommu nesting info to userspace Liu Yi L
2020-07-06 10:37   ` Auger Eric
2020-07-06 13:10     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-06 13:45       ` Auger Eric
2020-07-07  9:31         ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-08  8:08           ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-08 19:29             ` Alex Williamson
2020-07-09  0:25               ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-06 14:06   ` Auger Eric
2020-07-07  9:34     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] vfio: Add PASID allocation/free support Liu Yi L
2020-07-06 14:52   ` Auger Eric
2020-07-07  9:45     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] iommu/vt-d: Support setting ioasid set to domain Liu Yi L
2020-07-06 14:52   ` Auger Eric
2020-07-07  9:37     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] vfio/type1: Add VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST (alloc/free) Liu Yi L
2020-07-06 15:17   ` Auger Eric
2020-07-07  9:51     ` Liu, Yi L [this message]
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] iommu: Pass domain to sva_unbind_gpasid() Liu Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] iommu/vt-d: Check ownership for PASIDs from user-space Liu Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] vfio/type1: Support binding guest page tables to PASID Liu Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] vfio/type1: Allow invalidating first-level/stage IOMMU cache Liu Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] vfio/type1: Add vSVA support for IOMMU-backed mdevs Liu Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] vfio/pci: Expose PCIe PASID capability to guest Liu Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] vfio: Document dual stage control Liu Yi L
2020-07-04 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] iommu/vt-d: Support reporting nesting capability info Liu Yi L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CY4PR11MB14327F25FF2C50778B29B9BEC3660@CY4PR11MB1432.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jun.j.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=yi.y.sun@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

KVM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0 kvm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 kvm kvm/ https://lore.kernel.org/kvm \
		kvm@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index kvm

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.kvm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git