From: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@intel.com>,
"Sun, Yi Y" <yi.y.sun@intel.com>,
"jean-philippe@linaro.org" <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@intel.com>,
"stefanha@gmail.com" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 15/15] iommu/vt-d: Support reporting nesting capability info
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:33:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM5PR11MB14355BD93D10F5CB5CE9F056C37B0@DM5PR11MB1435.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be27f7ee-3fac-d1c5-0cd9-9581f8827de6@redhat.com>
Hi Eric,
> From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2020 1:14 AM
>
> Hi Yi,
>
> Missing a proper commit message. You can comment on the fact you only
> support the case where all the physical iomms have the same CAP/ECAP MASKS
got it. will add it. it looks like the subject is straightforward, so I removed commit
message.
>
> On 7/12/20 1:21 PM, Liu Yi L wrote:
> > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> > CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
> > Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > v2 -> v3:
> > *) remove cap/ecap_mask in iommu_nesting_info.
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 81
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 16 +++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > index a9504cb..9f7ad1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > @@ -5659,12 +5659,16 @@ static inline bool iommu_pasid_support(void)
> > static inline bool nested_mode_support(void)
> > {
> > struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
> > - struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> > + struct intel_iommu *iommu, *prev = NULL;
> > bool ret = true;
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
> > - if (!sm_supported(iommu) || !ecap_nest(iommu->ecap)) {
> > + if (!prev)
> > + prev = iommu;
> > + if (!sm_supported(iommu) || !ecap_nest(iommu->ecap) ||
> > + (VTD_CAP_MASK & (iommu->cap ^ prev->cap)) ||
> > + (VTD_ECAP_MASK & (iommu->ecap ^ prev->ecap))) {
> > ret = false;
> > break;> }
> > @@ -6079,6 +6083,78 @@ intel_iommu_domain_set_attr(struct iommu_domain
> *domain,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int intel_iommu_get_nesting_info(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + struct iommu_nesting_info *info)
> > +{
> > + struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
> > + u64 cap = VTD_CAP_MASK, ecap = VTD_ECAP_MASK;
> > + struct device_domain_info *domain_info;
> > + struct iommu_nesting_info_vtd vtd;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + unsigned int size;
> > +
> > + if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED ||
> > + !(dmar_domain->flags & DOMAIN_FLAG_NESTING_MODE))
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + if (!info)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + size = sizeof(struct iommu_nesting_info) +
> > + sizeof(struct iommu_nesting_info_vtd);
> > + /*
> > + * if provided buffer size is smaller than expected, should
> > + * return 0 and also the expected buffer size to caller.
> > + */
> > + if (info->size < size) {
> > + info->size = size;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> > + /*
> > + * arbitrary select the first domain_info as all nesting
> > + * related capabilities should be consistent across iommu
> > + * units.
> > + */
> > + domain_info = list_first_entry(&dmar_domain->devices,
> > + struct device_domain_info, link);
> > + cap &= domain_info->iommu->cap;
> > + ecap &= domain_info->iommu->ecap;
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + info->format = IOMMU_PASID_FORMAT_INTEL_VTD;
> > + info->features = IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_SYSWIDE_PASID |
> > + IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_BIND_PGTBL |
> > + IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_CACHE_INVLD;
> > + info->addr_width = dmar_domain->gaw;
> > + info->pasid_bits = ilog2(intel_pasid_max_id);
> > + info->padding = 0;
> > + vtd.flags = 0;
> > + vtd.padding = 0;
> > + vtd.cap_reg = cap;
> > + vtd.ecap_reg = ecap;
> > +
> > + memcpy(info->data, &vtd, sizeof(vtd));
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int intel_iommu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > + enum iommu_attr attr, void *data)
> > +{
> > + switch (attr) {
> > + case DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING:
> > + {
> > + struct iommu_nesting_info *info =
> > + (struct iommu_nesting_info *)data;
> > +
> > + return intel_iommu_get_nesting_info(domain, info);
> > + }
> > + default:
> > + return -ENODEV;
> -ENOENT?
arm_smmu_domain_get_attr() is using -ENODEV, so I used the same. I can
modify it if -ENOENT is better. :-)
Regards,
Yi Liu
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Check that the device does not live on an external facing PCI port that is
> > * marked as untrusted. Such devices should not be able to apply quirks and
> > @@ -6101,6 +6177,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
> > .domain_alloc = intel_iommu_domain_alloc,
> > .domain_free = intel_iommu_domain_free,
> > .domain_set_attr = intel_iommu_domain_set_attr,
> > + .domain_get_attr = intel_iommu_domain_get_attr,
> > .attach_dev = intel_iommu_attach_device,
> > .detach_dev = intel_iommu_detach_device,
> > .aux_attach_dev = intel_iommu_aux_attach_device,
> > diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > index 18f292e..c4ed0d4 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > @@ -197,6 +197,22 @@
> > #define ecap_max_handle_mask(e) ((e >> 20) & 0xf)
> > #define ecap_sc_support(e) ((e >> 7) & 0x1) /* Snooping Control */
> >
> > +/* Nesting Support Capability Alignment */
> > +#define VTD_CAP_FL1GP BIT_ULL(56)
> > +#define VTD_CAP_FL5LP BIT_ULL(60)
> > +#define VTD_ECAP_PRS BIT_ULL(29)
> > +#define VTD_ECAP_ERS BIT_ULL(30)
> > +#define VTD_ECAP_SRS BIT_ULL(31)
> > +#define VTD_ECAP_EAFS BIT_ULL(34)
> > +#define VTD_ECAP_PASID BIT_ULL(40)
>
> > +
> > +/* Only capabilities marked in below MASKs are reported */
> > +#define VTD_CAP_MASK (VTD_CAP_FL1GP | VTD_CAP_FL5LP)
> > +
> > +#define VTD_ECAP_MASK (VTD_ECAP_PRS | VTD_ECAP_ERS | \
> > + VTD_ECAP_SRS | VTD_ECAP_EAFS | \
> > + VTD_ECAP_PASID)
> > +
> > /* Virtual command interface capability */
> > #define vccap_pasid(v) (((v) & DMA_VCS_PAS)) /* PASID allocation
> */
> >
> >
> Thanks
>
> Eric
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-20 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-12 11:20 [PATCH v5 00/15] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs Liu Yi L
2020-07-12 11:20 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] vfio/type1: Refactor vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl() Liu Yi L
2020-07-12 11:20 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] iommu: Report domain nesting info Liu Yi L
2020-07-17 16:29 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 7:20 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:20 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] iommu/smmu: Report empty " Liu Yi L
2020-07-13 13:14 ` Will Deacon
2020-07-14 10:12 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-16 15:39 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-07-16 20:38 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-17 9:09 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-07-17 10:28 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-23 9:44 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-23 9:40 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-17 17:18 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 7:26 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:20 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] vfio/type1: Report iommu nesting info to userspace Liu Yi L
2020-07-17 17:34 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 7:51 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-20 8:33 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 8:51 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] vfio: Add PASID allocation/free support Liu Yi L
2020-07-19 15:38 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 8:03 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-20 8:26 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 8:49 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] iommu/vt-d: Support setting ioasid set to domain Liu Yi L
2020-07-19 15:38 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 8:11 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] vfio/type1: Add VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST (alloc/free) Liu Yi L
2020-07-19 15:38 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 8:56 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] iommu: Pass domain to sva_unbind_gpasid() Liu Yi L
2020-07-19 15:37 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 9:06 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] iommu/vt-d: Check ownership for PASIDs from user-space Liu Yi L
2020-07-19 16:06 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 10:18 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-20 12:37 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 12:55 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] vfio/type1: Support binding guest page tables to PASID Liu Yi L
2020-07-20 9:37 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 10:37 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] vfio/type1: Allow invalidating first-level/stage IOMMU cache Liu Yi L
2020-07-20 9:41 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 10:42 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] vfio/type1: Add vSVA support for IOMMU-backed mdevs Liu Yi L
2020-07-20 12:22 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-23 12:05 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] vfio/pci: Expose PCIe PASID capability to guest Liu Yi L
2020-07-20 12:35 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 13:00 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] vfio: Document dual stage control Liu Yi L
2020-07-18 13:39 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-25 8:54 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-12 11:21 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] iommu/vt-d: Support reporting nesting capability info Liu Yi L
2020-07-17 17:14 ` Auger Eric
2020-07-20 13:33 ` Liu, Yi L [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM5PR11MB14355BD93D10F5CB5CE9F056C37B0@DM5PR11MB1435.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jun.j.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).