From: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"yangbo.lu@nxp.com" <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>,
"john.stultz@linaro.org" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"sean.j.christopherson@intel.com"
<sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
"richardcochran@gmail.com" <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Steven Price <Steven.Price@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>, Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@arm.com>,
Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v9 7/8] ptp: arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm64
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:37:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <HE1PR0801MB16765F2905CD0F381E33AD9EF4350@HE1PR0801MB1676.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a85deebc23c1fa77e6f70b6eaef22a34@kernel.org>
Hi Marc,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 6:35 PM
> To: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; yangbo.lu@nxp.com; john.stultz@linaro.org;
> tglx@linutronix.de; pbonzini@redhat.com; sean.j.christopherson@intel.com;
> richardcochran@gmail.com; Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>;
> will@kernel.org; Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>; Steven Price
> <Steven.Price@arm.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu;
> kvm@vger.kernel.org; Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>; Kaly Xin
> <Kaly.Xin@arm.com>; Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 7/8] ptp: arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm64
>
> Hi Jianyong,
>
> On 2020-01-10 10:15, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> > Hi Marc,
>
> [...]
>
> >> >> > + ktime_overall = hvc_res.a0 << 32 | hvc_res.a1;
> >> >> > + *ts = ktime_to_timespec64(ktime_overall);
> >> >> > + *cycle = hvc_res.a2 << 32 | hvc_res.a3;
> >> >>
> >> >> So why isn't that just a read of the virtual counter, given that
> >> >> what you do in the hypervisor seems to be "cntpct - cntvoff"?
> >> >>
> >> >> What am I missing here?
> >> >>
> >> > We need get clock time and counter cycle at the same time, so we
> >> > can't just read virtual counter at guest and must get it from host.
> >>
> >> See my comment in my reply to patch #6: *Must* seems like a very
> >> strong word, and you don't explain *why* that's better than just
> >> computing the total hypercall cost. Hint: given the frequency of the
> >> counter (in the few MHz
> >> range) vs the frequency of a CPU (in the multiple GHz range, and with
> >> an IPC close enough to 1), I doubt that you'll see the counter making
> >> much progress across a hypercall.
> >>
> > Sorry, I will avoid to use those strong words.
> >
> > It's really the case that the hypercall won't across cycle in general.
> > But sometimes, kernel preempt
> > may happen in the middle of the hypercall which we can't assume how
> > long before schedule back. so it's better capture them together at the
> > same time.
>
> Fair enough. Please document the rational, as I guess others will ask the
> same questions.
>
Ok
> Then the problem to solve is that of the reference counter, as you so far
> assume the virtual counter. I guess you need to be able to let the guest
> select the reference counter when calling the PTP service.
>
I could not come up with an idea about the point where the guest give this info of counter value.
Where we give that interface to ptp service, as it's not a user space application.
> [...]
>
> > By the way, does nested virtualization diff between arm64 and arm32?
>
> There is no nested virt for 32bit (it is explicitly forbidden by the architecture).
>
Ok, thanks
Thanks
Jianyong
> M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-13 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 3:40 [RFC PATCH v9 0/8] Enable ptp_kvm for arm64 Jianyong Wu
2019-12-10 3:40 ` [RFC PATCH v9 1/8] arm/arm64: smccc/psci: add arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() Jianyong Wu
2019-12-10 3:40 ` [RFC PATCH v9 2/8] psci: let arm_smccc_1_1_invoke available by modules Jianyong Wu
2019-12-10 3:40 ` [RFC PATCH v9 3/8] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm modules to make it arch-independent Jianyong Wu
2019-12-10 3:40 ` [RFC PATCH v9 4/8] time: Add mechanism to recognize clocksource in time_get_snapshot Jianyong Wu
2019-12-10 3:40 ` [RFC PATCH v9 5/8] clocksource: Add clocksource id for arm arch counter Jianyong Wu
2019-12-10 3:40 ` [RFC PATCH v9 6/8] psci: Add hvc call service for ptp_kvm Jianyong Wu
2020-01-07 9:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-09 5:45 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-01-09 9:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-10 9:51 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-01-10 10:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-13 10:30 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-01-13 11:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-14 10:34 ` Jianyong Wu
2019-12-10 3:40 ` [RFC PATCH v9 7/8] ptp: arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm64 Jianyong Wu
2020-01-07 9:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-09 5:59 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-01-09 9:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-09 9:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-10 10:15 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-01-10 10:15 ` Jianyong Wu
2020-01-10 10:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-13 10:37 ` Jianyong Wu [this message]
2020-01-13 11:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-14 10:22 ` Jianyong Wu
2019-12-10 3:40 ` [RFC PATCH v9 8/8] kvm: arm64: Add capability check extension for ptp_kvm Jianyong Wu
2020-01-06 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH v9 0/8] Enable ptp_kvm for arm64 Jianyong Wu
2020-01-07 8:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-07 9:33 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=HE1PR0801MB16765F2905CD0F381E33AD9EF4350@HE1PR0801MB1676.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
--cc=Justin.He@arm.com \
--cc=Kaly.Xin@arm.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=Steven.Price@arm.com \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).