From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/4] iommu: Add iommu_aux_get_domain_for_dev()
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 23:49:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB1645736D9ED91A95D1D4519A8C700@MWHPR11MB1645.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200729142507.182cd18a@x1.home>
> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 4:25 AM
>
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:57:02 +0800
> Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > The device driver needs an API to get its aux-domain. A typical usage
> > scenario is:
> >
> > unsigned long pasid;
> > struct iommu_domain *domain;
> > struct device *dev = mdev_dev(mdev);
> > struct device *iommu_device = vfio_mdev_get_iommu_device(dev);
> >
> > domain = iommu_aux_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
> > if (!domain)
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > pasid = iommu_aux_get_pasid(domain, iommu_device);
> > if (pasid <= 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > /* Program the device context */
> > ....
> >
> > This adds an API for such use case.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/iommu.h | 7 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > index cad5a19ebf22..434bf42b6b9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > @@ -2817,6 +2817,24 @@ void iommu_aux_detach_group(struct
> iommu_domain *domain,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_aux_detach_group);
> >
> > +struct iommu_domain *iommu_aux_get_domain_for_dev(struct device
> *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct iommu_domain *domain = NULL;
> > + struct iommu_group *group;
> > +
> > + group = iommu_group_get(dev);
> > + if (!group)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + if (group->aux_domain_attached)
> > + domain = group->domain;
>
> Why wouldn't the aux domain flag be on the domain itself rather than
> the group? Then if we wanted sanity checking in patch 1/ we'd only
> need to test the flag on the object we're provided.
>
> If we had such a flag, we could create an iommu_domain_is_aux()
> function and then simply use iommu_get_domain_for_dev() and test that
> it's an aux domain in the example use case. It seems like that would
IOMMU layer manages domains per parent device. Here given a
dev (of mdev), we need a way to find its associated domain under its
parent device. And we cannot simply use iommu_get_domain_for_dev
on the parent device of the mdev, as it will give us the primary domain
of parent device.
Thanks
Kevin
> resolve the jump from a domain to an aux-domain just as well as adding
> this separate iommu_aux_get_domain_for_dev() interface. The is_aux
> test might also be useful in other cases too. Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> > +
> > + iommu_group_put(group);
> > +
> > + return domain;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_aux_get_domain_for_dev);
> > +
> > /**
> > * iommu_sva_bind_device() - Bind a process address space to a device
> > * @dev: the device
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> > index 9506551139ab..cda6cef7579e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> > @@ -639,6 +639,7 @@ int iommu_aux_attach_group(struct
> iommu_domain *domain,
> > struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev);
> > void iommu_aux_detach_group(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev);
> > +struct iommu_domain *iommu_aux_get_domain_for_dev(struct device
> *dev);
> >
> > struct iommu_sva *iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev,
> > struct mm_struct *mm,
> > @@ -1040,6 +1041,12 @@ iommu_aux_detach_group(struct
> iommu_domain *domain,
> > {
> > }
> >
> > +static inline struct iommu_domain *
> > +iommu_aux_get_domain_for_dev(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline struct iommu_sva *
> > iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, void
> *drvdata)
> > {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-14 5:56 [PATCH v3 0/4] iommu aux-domain APIs extensions Lu Baolu
2020-07-14 5:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] iommu: Check IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_AUX feature in aux api's Lu Baolu
2020-07-29 20:03 ` Alex Williamson
2020-07-30 1:46 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-14 5:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] iommu: Add iommu_aux_at(de)tach_group() Lu Baolu
2020-07-14 16:39 ` Jacob Pan
2020-07-15 0:47 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-15 16:01 ` Jacob Pan
2020-07-16 1:07 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-29 20:03 ` Alex Williamson
2020-07-29 23:34 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-07-30 19:46 ` Alex Williamson
2020-07-31 5:47 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-31 18:05 ` Alex Williamson
2020-08-03 1:57 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-14 5:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] iommu: Add iommu_aux_get_domain_for_dev() Lu Baolu
2020-07-29 20:25 ` Alex Williamson
2020-07-29 23:49 ` Tian, Kevin [this message]
2020-07-30 20:17 ` Alex Williamson
2020-07-31 0:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-07-31 2:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-07-31 6:30 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-31 18:14 ` Alex Williamson
2020-08-03 2:15 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-14 5:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] vfio/type1: Use iommu_aux_at(de)tach_group() APIs Lu Baolu
2020-07-14 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-14 16:29 ` Jacob Pan
2020-07-15 1:00 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-15 1:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-07-29 20:32 ` Alex Williamson
2020-07-30 2:41 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-30 21:17 ` Alex Williamson
2020-07-31 1:37 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-30 9:36 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-07-31 1:39 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-23 13:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] iommu aux-domain APIs extensions Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MWHPR11MB1645736D9ED91A95D1D4519A8C700@MWHPR11MB1645.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).