From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2AEC433DB for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B703D22D5A for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391736AbhALAZm (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:25:42 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34474 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404135AbhAKXdG (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:33:06 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05E6C207A3; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:32:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1610407945; bh=LczhwW+N+iznK3dnwTahPQBroL4IYxoj+IRa6zKVDSM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iVviXlREZf/12tTlp0fpybzFaKm1Uga4Xf97sh1jpQLA3Ug9ZW36DEp2Kvu2EV77h rssQrLTIMkPVs6V5j4ezgKF5RMVrPL1vciseFdjnGE5KXEw4z+MOl6qLlokqsjPv2+ jgJ2qmnqscLrxWQrGNi+ThyT87wDuUM3SeW2y2zQ4JMbtLLQF+LQGssBmlCWQheyWs hiofYtyj9qj21Nbun8j8JqXHQ4mOPTz0x08/nanJB4OGXeXH84msPx0PnekDlII0rG yGWbCttpR0HUuAkY+X0BkRC77SbRgBJBfmyq+Uq9DKDIf9Oy4TzYnpmoYqT+QRro7u ZAvgRa0Tdlk2w== Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 01:32:19 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Kai Huang Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, luto@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/23] x86/sgx: Add enum for SGX_CHILD_PRESENT error code Message-ID: References: <2a41e15dfda722dd1e34feeda34ce864cd82361b.1609890536.git.kai.huang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2a41e15dfda722dd1e34feeda34ce864cd82361b.1609890536.git.kai.huang@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 02:55:19PM +1300, Kai Huang wrote: > From: Sean Christopherson > > SGX virtualization requires to allocate "raw" EPC and use it as "virtual > EPC" for SGX guest. Unlike EPC used by SGX driver, virtual EPC doesn't > track how EPC pages are used in VM, e.g. (de)construction of enclaves, > so it cannot guarantee EREMOVE success, e.g. it doesn't have a priori > knowledge of which pages are SECS with non-zero child counts. > > Add SGX_CHILD_PRESENT for use by SGX virtualization to assert EREMOVE > failures are expected, but only due to SGX_CHILD_PRESENT. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > Signed-off-by: Kai Huang Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen /Jarkko