kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Shivam Kumar <shivam.kumar1@nutanix.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Shaju Abraham <shaju.abraham@nutanix.com>,
	Manish Mishra <manish.mishra@nutanix.com>,
	Anurag Madnawat <anurag.madnawat@nutanix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: Implement dirty quota-based throttling of vcpus
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 19:20:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0B753GVEgGP/Iqg@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y0B5RFI25TotwWHT@google.com>

On Fri, Oct 07, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022, Shivam Kumar wrote:
> Let's keep kvm_vcpu_check_dirty_quota(), IMO that's still the least awful name.
> 
> [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yo+82LjHSOdyxKzT@google.com

Actually, I take that back.  The code snippet itself is also flawed.  If userspace
increases the quota (or disables it entirely) between KVM snapshotting the quota
and making the request, then there's no need for KVM to exit to userspace.

So I think this can be:

static void kvm_vcpu_is_dirty_quota_exchausted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_DIRTY_QUOTA
	u64 dirty_quota = READ_ONCE(vcpu->run->dirty_quota);

	return dirty_quota && (vcpu->stat.generic.pages_dirtied >= dirty_quota);
#else
	return false;
#endif
}

and the usage becomes:

		if (kvm_vcpu_is_dirty_quota_exhausted(vcpu))
			kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_DIRTY_QUOTA_EXIT, vcpu);

More thoughts in the x86 patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-07 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-15 10:10 [PATCH v6 0/5] KVM: Dirty quota-based throttling Shivam Kumar
2022-09-15 10:10 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] KVM: Implement dirty quota-based throttling of vcpus Shivam Kumar
2022-09-15 13:21   ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-09-15 14:34     ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-07 18:18       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-09 18:36         ` Shivam Kumar
2022-10-10  6:12           ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-10-07 19:08   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-07 19:20     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-10-09 18:49       ` Shivam Kumar
2022-10-10 16:09         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-09 19:30     ` Shivam Kumar
2022-10-10  5:41   ` Shivam Kumar
2022-10-17  5:28     ` Shivam Kumar
2022-10-19 16:01       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-15 10:10 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] KVM: x86: Dirty " Shivam Kumar
2022-10-07 19:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-09 19:05     ` Shivam Kumar
2022-10-18 17:43       ` Shivam Kumar
2022-10-19 15:42         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-09 19:17     ` Shivam Kumar
2022-09-15 10:10 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] KVM: arm64: " Shivam Kumar
2022-09-15 10:10 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] KVM: s390x: " Shivam Kumar
2022-09-15 13:24   ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-09-15 10:10 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] KVM: selftests: Add selftests for dirty quota throttling Shivam Kumar
2022-10-07 18:29   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-09 19:26     ` Shivam Kumar
2022-10-10 15:47       ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y0B753GVEgGP/Iqg@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=anurag.madnawat@nutanix.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manish.mishra@nutanix.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaju.abraham@nutanix.com \
    --cc=shivam.kumar1@nutanix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).