From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C25C4332E for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 22:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0063122A84 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 22:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730648AbhANWNe (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:13:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52220 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730666AbhANWN0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:13:26 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3B6BC0613C1 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:13:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id y12so3908754pji.1 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:13:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=C8h+j5fbJSEN0pJyExzvFI/MxCa+pEdm2TUh5tsiGUA=; b=uNU6S2j9Z7ETIRlQlv2eUjEMkA8U/qFKEvuUleM375unDtjtkDX8cMyHoohHqXnu3W woYXW0GCkFcdtlDOMiQz50569KgWKHvyTTEFwv7UOgS1c+xE2ir/5nHZsOSyZeRAH7Ku 86dgto04m3LMpnK43rXHsPuD7bzDcqf2OZHjdW5xOKqQHgwAigATZabASQnnAyVfhklm dZ3f+Xe44pOeMBsC6ETbOrcwjksgZzoAzRZudnEme+wpGS+gD1BSXcQsj3SZ5pNd8coN DrbSGZsUTi7YPQIg3oQyrRYHBvkQRifNgo63roHlOl0oPOe/SSlAsyQsvaGP9kf+9NQM Y58g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=C8h+j5fbJSEN0pJyExzvFI/MxCa+pEdm2TUh5tsiGUA=; b=V/o93ZUkDdrWnPRMhrSls6uGefZQs4lEw5oY3GJONZaiYqLKCbKav1GWLDZY6b5npL 5NQMuifofpOe/+vjFcDN+gEEiFWTPxK1ngtftp8fmG36Wh22cLhWS+5hBiZM2Wqk6R01 CnC3TkQPlyn2pVzoMZXWwnlvQLtTyvgPGnZ0lKKYTxnupdMc1lIf4aMAWtvq1Ib0PhO6 miZwOf845+vd5hIdUZtMpNY3EWmKvPBmtYIhIic0FDhIpWmmjHBKzYDQZ1dEYZAmVb+k Jkx2R65TNTXHnO5SUBpi818qq6MzlCdHVABAVY8SOgq0del33JjZHaMb7M5SkvHzvrU6 DjjA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530I4zTPEoBC2+tF7SE9zXiAaVSspsXUmHatDy3jxKKcfJkeb/0o XRIwQj8VJoDwS0RoWbV/po/VkA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzF4jDEXIqIrZPuOIsgAL5RITqUyNw+o2KW3iUpVlpABpLpOS8lo5ggaR3l8+U1rmu3Jn2YCg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5581:: with SMTP id c1mr7147041pji.86.1610662390345; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:13:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:f:10:1ea0:b8ff:fe73:50f5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d19sm5751219pjw.37.2021.01.14.14.13.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:13:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:13:03 -0800 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, mlevitsk@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH kvm-unit-tests 0/4] add generic stress test Message-ID: References: <20201223010850.111882-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 14, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 14/01/21 21:13, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 12/01/21 23:28, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > > What's the biggest hurdle for doing this completely within the unit test > > > > framework? Is teaching the framework to migrate a unit test the biggest pain? > > > > > > Yes, pretty much. The shell script framework would show its limits. > > > > > > That said, I've always treated run_tests.sh as a utility more than an > > > integral part of kvm-unit-tests. There's nothing that prevents a more > > > capable framework from parsing unittests.cfg. > > > > Heh, got anyone you can "volunteer" to create a new framework? One-button > > migration testing would be very nice to have. I suspect I'm not the only > > contributor that doesn't do migration testing as part of their standard workflow. > > avocado-vt is the one I use for installation tests. It can do a lot more, > including migration, but it is a bit hard to set up. Is avocado-vt the test stuff you were talking about at the KVM Forum BoF?