From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: use static calls to reduce kvm_x86_ops overhead
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:45:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YAFkTSnSut1h/jWt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e057bf1b8a7ad15652df6eeba3f907ae758d3399.1610680941.git.jbaron@akamai.com>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:27:56PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 5060922..9d4492b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> static inline int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> if (kvm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush &&
> - !kvm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush(kvm))
> + !static_call(kvm_x86_tlb_remote_flush)(kvm))
> return 0;
> else
> return -ENOTSUPP;
Would you be able to use something like this?
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201110101307.GO2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
we could also add __static_call_return1(), if that would help.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-15 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-15 3:27 [PATCH v2 0/3] Use static_call for kvm_x86_ops Jason Baron
2021-01-15 3:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: X86: append vmx/svm prefix to additional kvm_x86_ops functions Jason Baron
2021-01-15 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-15 15:05 ` Jason Baron
2021-01-15 3:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86: introduce definitions to support static calls for kvm_x86_ops Jason Baron
2021-01-15 9:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-15 13:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-15 15:03 ` Jason Baron
2021-01-15 3:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: use static calls to reduce kvm_x86_ops overhead Jason Baron
2021-01-15 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-01-15 9:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-15 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-15 13:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Use static_call for kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YAFkTSnSut1h/jWt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).