From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
jarkko@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] KVM: VMX: Enable SGX virtualization for SGX1, SGX2 and LC
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:16:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YH2e1lIckOBY2OGa@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d376fef419077376eecb017ab494ba7ffc393a7.camel@intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021, Kai Huang wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-04-17 at 16:11 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 12/04/21 06:21, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > @@ -4377,6 +4380,15 @@ static void vmx_compute_secondary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> > > if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.bus_lock_detection_enabled)
> > > exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_BUS_LOCK_DETECTION;
> > >
> > >
> > > + if (cpu_has_vmx_encls_vmexit() && nested) {
> > > + if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SGX))
> > > + vmx->nested.msrs.secondary_ctls_high |=
> > > + SECONDARY_EXEC_ENCLS_EXITING;
> > > + else
> > > + vmx->nested.msrs.secondary_ctls_high &=
> > > + ~SECONDARY_EXEC_ENCLS_EXITING;
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > This is incorrect, I've removed it. The MSRs can only be written by
> > userspace.
vmx_compute_secondary_exec_control() violates that left, right, and center, it's
just buried down in vmx_adjust_secondary_exec_control(). This is an open coded
version of that helper, sans the actual update to exec_control since ENCLS needs
to be conditionally intercepted even when it's exposed to the guest.
> > If SGX is disabled in the guest CPUID, nested_vmx_exit_handled_encls can
> > just do:
> >
> > if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SGX) ||
> > !nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_ENCLS_EXITING))
> > return false;
> >
> > and the useless ENCLS exiting bitmap in vmcs12 will be ignored.
> >
> > Paolo
> >
>
> Thanks for queuing this series!
>
> Looks good to me. However if I read code correctly, in this way a side effect would be
> vmx->nested.msrs.secondary_ctls_high will always have SECONDARY_EXEC_ENCLS_EXITING bit
> set, even SGX is not exposed to guest, which means a guest can set this even SGX is not
> present, but I think it is OK since ENCLS exiting bitmap in vmcs12 will be ignored anyway
> in nested_vmx_exit_handled_encls() as you mentioned above.
>
> Anyway, I have tested this code and it works at my side (by creating L2 with SGX support
> and running SGX workloads inside it).
>
> Sean, please also comment if you have any.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-19 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-12 4:21 [PATCH v5 00/11] KVM SGX virtualization support (KVM part) Kai Huang
2021-04-12 4:21 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] KVM: x86: Export kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_{read,write}() for SGX (VMX) Kai Huang
2021-04-12 4:21 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] KVM: x86: Define new #PF SGX error code bit Kai Huang
2021-04-12 4:21 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] KVM: x86: Add support for reverse CPUID lookup of scattered features Kai Huang
2021-04-17 13:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-12 4:21 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] KVM: x86: Add reverse-CPUID lookup support for scattered SGX features Kai Huang
2021-04-17 13:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-12 4:21 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] KVM: VMX: Add basic handling of VM-Exit from SGX enclave Kai Huang
2021-04-12 4:21 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] KVM: VMX: Frame in ENCLS handler for SGX virtualization Kai Huang
2021-04-12 4:21 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] KVM: VMX: Add SGX ENCLS[ECREATE] handler to enforce CPUID restrictions Kai Huang
2021-04-12 4:21 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] KVM: VMX: Add emulation of SGX Launch Control LE hash MSRs Kai Huang
2021-04-17 13:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-12 4:21 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] KVM: VMX: Add ENCLS[EINIT] handler to support SGX Launch Control (LC) Kai Huang
2021-04-12 4:21 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] KVM: VMX: Enable SGX virtualization for SGX1, SGX2 and LC Kai Huang
2021-04-12 9:51 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-12 10:47 ` Kai Huang
2021-04-17 14:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-19 11:44 ` Kai Huang
2021-04-19 15:16 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-04-19 17:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-12 4:21 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] KVM: x86: Add capability to grant VM access to privileged SGX attribute Kai Huang
2021-04-12 11:28 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-13 14:51 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] KVM SGX virtualization support (KVM part) Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-13 15:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-13 21:47 ` Kai Huang
2021-04-17 14:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YH2e1lIckOBY2OGa@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).