From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13198C47089 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8247610CE for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235959AbhE0P2X (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 11:28:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33828 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235932AbhE0P2T (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 11:28:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com (mail-pj1-x102c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71391C061574 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:26:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id mp9-20020a17090b1909b029015fd1e3ad5aso2571690pjb.3 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:26:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=g41hxtedvAPuwE0Bgwohmu9YFT1X+9KIiXKB5j94JK0=; b=v6RbfHZN4fmzVBDAHhBq4fGupOliqm3C4RorLbjgX1eKh46/G8OnlOsZVCQAsAGFgd 3k5flTuyj1wm9jsPGyU61yIP1foROUZhGL1HkGzfQysPRSKMki8Al+5oHDu5b99LDBbQ ZT2h59wn2k8oi327W04t+82OHLAikBMOJtgXOobpeRmPzvPUMTDhaVJwkP/h0UsCNBs/ 3y2ZC/VYTjieHv8W9VRGvrC/SdzdP2RL3IfzsINHiy2BZ0TNAnXZylw6Vl7Wv8XnHXnY 4C6GbpiO6EP3ixHcqOPDMOcGOOu3kSp4/K1DS5EaelkwPa+b9npI9e6Jzxvf7Vhq18vh 0vSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=g41hxtedvAPuwE0Bgwohmu9YFT1X+9KIiXKB5j94JK0=; b=Tjg1FkrFB2VUPqXoBOlraqEOoK1nvDPBfRwSMGXWc0r8w+ibHlQoMK+tUcK7L8U21J eyQEkfXYkeBf6Q0cDxkFGSmgR21Uxkv9WIZ1uQ6K9HTa0yXSp52NH6qgenZM9lx9nhuj lH91vKrsOhZqz1vKs+zTtBGfbFNSVu2DPGYYwDUcap3XlfUADXhdnDQF7EehTcZlObtJ aniT9DowlMTe36GOGAq+cm+OlWde5Rz5vMCPAQ6zdS+PeTgy+moqKBbpaJvB+BRfgpcp 7LbVTI0V6+xlxUIC2oFBSioDlh1e9fcUhAiPw2VI0Q6cnG0o/Zmi8K4Qc4JWnqlLdQyA VeCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GdzyMxf2R33I0uX3FgZHbx8yr+UvKlTad1xL/F7fKes/BvBsb +KXV57VFe8POsK3f6yHoh6Q+Hg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqQ75fPMFPAqqOHuJR82LI+ByIXCaHpYZ5DmitW6UIrwx+jhfulftdroLX41iYe6tVyNj4Pw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9304:b029:fb:9edd:e628 with SMTP id bc4-20020a1709029304b02900fb9edde628mr3737519plb.73.1622129205811; Thu, 27 May 2021 08:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (240.111.247.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.247.111.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm2233709pjz.41.2021.05.27.08.26.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 27 May 2021 08:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:26:41 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Ben Gardon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Xu , Peter Shier , Peter Feiner , Junaid Shahid , Jim Mattson , Yulei Zhang , Wanpeng Li , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Xiao Guangrong Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] More parallel operations for the TDP MMU Message-ID: References: <20210401233736.638171-1-bgardon@google.com> <822c0a82-2609-bd76-2bb6-43134271bccf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <822c0a82-2609-bd76-2bb6-43134271bccf@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 27, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 26/05/21 23:34, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > Applied to kvm/mmu-notifier-queue, thanks. > > What's the plan for kvm/mmu-notifier-queue? More specifically, are the hashes > > stable, i.e. will non-critical review feedback get squashed? I was finally > > getting around to reviewing this, but what's sitting in that branch doesn't > > appear to be exactly what's posted here. If the hashes are stable, I'll probably > > test and review functionality, but not do a thorough review. > > It's all in 5.13 except for the lock elision patch, for which I was waiting > for a review. I'll post that patch separately. Ha, stable indeed. Thanks!