kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	maz@kernel.org, eric.auger@redhat.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Split base and pmu registers
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:26:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLgTu4EEnwfrtHSo@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531103344.29325-6-drjones@redhat.com>

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 12:33:44PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Since KVM commit 11663111cd49 ("KVM: arm64: Hide PMU registers from
> userspace when not available") the get-reg-list* tests have been
> failing with
> 
>   ...
>   ... There are 74 missing registers.
>   The following lines are missing registers:
>   ...
> 
> where the 74 missing registers are all PMU registers. This isn't a
> bug in KVM that the selftest found, even though it's true that a
> KVM userspace that wasn't setting the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3 VCPU
> flag, but still expecting the PMU registers to be in the reg-list,
> would suddenly no longer have their expectations met. In that case,
> the expectations were wrong, though, so that KVM userspace needs to
> be fixed, and so does this selftest. The fix for this selftest is to
> pull the PMU registers out of the base register sublist into their
> own sublist and then create new, pmu-enabled vcpu configs which can
> be tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>

> ---
>  .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c      | 39 +++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> index b46b8a1fdc0c..a16c8f05366c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>   * The current blessed list was primed with the output of kernel version
>   * v4.15 with --core-reg-fixup and then later updated with new registers.
>   *
> - * The blessed list is up to date with kernel version v5.10-rc5
> + * The blessed list is up to date with kernel version v5.13-rc3
>   */
>  static __u64 base_regs[] = {
>  	KVM_REG_ARM64 | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]),
> @@ -829,8 +829,6 @@ static __u64 base_regs[] = {
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 5, 2, 0),	/* ESR_EL1 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 6, 0, 0),	/* FAR_EL1 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 7, 4, 0),	/* PAR_EL1 */
> -	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 9, 14, 1),	/* PMINTENSET_EL1 */
> -	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 9, 14, 2),	/* PMINTENCLR_EL1 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 10, 2, 0),	/* MAIR_EL1 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 10, 3, 0),	/* AMAIR_EL1 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 12, 0, 0),	/* VBAR_EL1 */
> @@ -839,6 +837,16 @@ static __u64 base_regs[] = {
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 13, 0, 4),	/* TPIDR_EL1 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 14, 1, 0),	/* CNTKCTL_EL1 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 2, 0, 0, 0),	/* CSSELR_EL1 */
> +	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 13, 0, 2),	/* TPIDR_EL0 */
> +	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 13, 0, 3),	/* TPIDRRO_EL0 */
> +	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 3, 0, 0),	/* DACR32_EL2 */
> +	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 5, 0, 1),	/* IFSR32_EL2 */
> +	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 5, 3, 0),	/* FPEXC32_EL2 */
> +};
> +
> +static __u64 pmu_regs[] = {
> +	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 9, 14, 1),	/* PMINTENSET_EL1 */
> +	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 9, 14, 2),	/* PMINTENCLR_EL1 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 12, 0),	/* PMCR_EL0 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 12, 1),	/* PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 12, 2),	/* PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
> @@ -848,8 +856,6 @@ static __u64 base_regs[] = {
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 13, 0),	/* PMCCNTR_EL0 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 14, 0),	/* PMUSERENR_EL0 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 14, 3),	/* PMOVSSET_EL0 */
> -	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 13, 0, 2),	/* TPIDR_EL0 */
> -	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 13, 0, 3),	/* TPIDRRO_EL0 */
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 8, 0),
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 8, 1),
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 8, 2),
> @@ -913,9 +919,6 @@ static __u64 base_regs[] = {
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 15, 5),
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 15, 6),
>  	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 15, 7),	/* PMCCFILTR_EL0 */
> -	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 3, 0, 0),	/* DACR32_EL2 */
> -	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 5, 0, 1),	/* IFSR32_EL2 */
> -	ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 5, 3, 0),	/* FPEXC32_EL2 */
>  };
>  
>  static __u64 vregs[] = {
> @@ -1015,6 +1018,8 @@ static __u64 sve_rejects_set[] = {
>  	{ "base", .regs = base_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(base_regs), }
>  #define VREGS_SUBLIST \
>  	{ "vregs", .regs = vregs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(vregs), }
> +#define PMU_SUBLIST \
> +	{ "pmu", .regs = pmu_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_regs), }
>  #define SVE_SUBLIST \
>  	{ "sve", .capability = KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE, .feature = KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE, .finalize = true, \
>  	  .regs = sve_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(sve_regs), \
> @@ -1027,6 +1032,14 @@ static struct vcpu_config vregs_config = {
>  	{0},
>  	},
>  };
> +static struct vcpu_config vregs_pmu_config = {
> +	.sublists = {
> +	BASE_SUBLIST,
> +	VREGS_SUBLIST,
> +	PMU_SUBLIST,
> +	{0},
> +	},
> +};
>  static struct vcpu_config sve_config = {
>  	.sublists = {
>  	BASE_SUBLIST,
> @@ -1034,9 +1047,19 @@ static struct vcpu_config sve_config = {
>  	{0},
>  	},
>  };
> +static struct vcpu_config sve_pmu_config = {
> +	.sublists = {
> +	BASE_SUBLIST,
> +	SVE_SUBLIST,
> +	PMU_SUBLIST,
> +	{0},
> +	},
> +};
>  
>  static struct vcpu_config *vcpu_configs[] = {
>  	&vregs_config,
> +	&vregs_pmu_config,
>  	&sve_config,
> +	&sve_pmu_config,
>  };
>  static int vcpu_configs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu_configs);
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-02 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-31 10:33 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: Fix get-reg-list Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Introduce vcpu configs Andrew Jones
2021-06-02 23:40   ` Ricardo Koller
2021-06-03 12:14     ` Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Prepare to run multiple configs at once Andrew Jones
2021-06-02 23:56   ` Ricardo Koller
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Provide config selection option Andrew Jones
2021-06-03  0:03   ` Ricardo Koller
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Remove get-reg-list-sve Andrew Jones
2021-06-03  0:09   ` Ricardo Koller
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Split base and pmu registers Andrew Jones
2021-06-02 23:26   ` Ricardo Koller [this message]
2021-06-22  7:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: Fix get-reg-list Andrew Jones
2021-06-22  7:32   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-22  7:48     ` Andrew Jones
2021-06-22  7:57 ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YLgTu4EEnwfrtHSo@google.com \
    --to=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).