From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F27C433EF for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8B9611BD for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236010AbhJMTba (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:31:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35590 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230298AbhJMTb2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:31:28 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA027C061570 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id s136so51840pgs.4 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:29:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HJWlwMc3bcVndzEG3rK1HHM2GpwqaG1vW1trPKMhPTE=; b=ngD+bHowU5GX0hIFoHwCgvBSYL1kIwj5BamgcK2b44Hn0Efa1cJh1BkhvPnJNyXaz+ oaTiT+/SvMe6Sna42CuymTahBBHtBTsM99qXGLLWtDgURRrWH7WsP4ESROuTVw/YrLgC CNfDMvuhnaZto7jmQiMkFOCpDK0ROXVXdyYLbaV5tFR9BX0J2eg3sjJpkF1ptwft6sX1 FWrvZX8CX+PrVKFcYhPqspYD4+FBt2wBaQ7Ooa8YpeerB3ORiRQFE/S6I6RUkpe3R4PG GECmmS0ixOIVW4fYFpRI7AkWVEQ3gsU1YNKQ5R8s4sfw7DL9MKXo3I22jJxSTVstAuO2 yFfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HJWlwMc3bcVndzEG3rK1HHM2GpwqaG1vW1trPKMhPTE=; b=6mLbXN19M78dnn8B0BJ3bmMbphD0cxJruNFLWGoY6t8bsv07rKeER3or9Wcnm4+afa iwDkde853Iz/czklaMdjNeG+BrcQS69qpwOlY7o3f118ze3VnB1DIlFpPWzI6suc9VAW +KXUsvaiDNtNkpn0kwaJTu8wYp6F8z/o/vBwFtlnLubmqJxFoQL33SYRrxGwmrzyYyUz nk4yKFnsiXrPfihLTw0UGe/lrKHpEK1K3OLFUbHRdmxOvkypf65M7hmBjY/OyuY5Q+Yj JKAJl4uUm/5x3tf2J7O/NJ7RpSoeJKKXp/X0pZ2mXqNvjJX0VaerKgI2oiopTD8JzNbm jVnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532EeDulHFYzO0bYAmjngsmk/RRra/OE+RGOLqU4QS1Xj5co0VQu MD+YO0dhWZvwR7VctcKLsf9/Og== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBnTbMERs0zBoP7LOWHM0wM+4dMwjgOwnXVqj4whYC/0ed3HgNAWHQmB2Rp9Cx46+JjoCGag== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2041:: with SMTP id r1mr828228pgm.482.1634153364099; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j6sm302246pgq.0.2021.10.13.12.29.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:29:20 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Salvatore Bonaccorso , Stephen , djwong@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, rppt@kernel.org, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, hagen@jauu.net Subject: Re: kvm crash in 5.14.1? Message-ID: References: <85e40141-3c17-1dff-1ed0-b016c5d778b6@gmail.com> <2cd8af17-8631-44b5-8580-371527beeb38@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 13/10/21 21:00, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 12:00:39PM -0700, Stephen wrote: > > > > I'll try to report back if I see a crash; or in roughly a week if the > > > system seems to have stabilized. > > > > > > Just wanted to provide a follow-up here and say that I've run on both > > > v5.14.8 and v5.14.9 with this patch and everything seems to be good; no > > > further crashes or problems. > > > > In Debian we got a report as well related to this issue (cf. > > https://bugs.debian.org/996175). Do you know did the patch felt > > through the cracks? > > Yeah, it's not a KVM patch so the mm maintainers didn't see it. I'll handle > it tomorrow. It's queued in the -mm tree. https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/20211010224759.Ny1hd1WiD%25akpm@linux-foundation.org/