From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF700C433FE for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232075AbiATQ2q (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:28:46 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:44202 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1376939AbiATQ2p (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:28:45 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D3FED1; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:28:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from monolith.localdoman (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDB443F73D; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:28:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:28:47 +0000 From: Alexandru Elisei To: Marc Zyngier Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Andre Przywara , Christoffer Dall , Jintack Lim , Haibo Xu , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 19/69] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle SPSR_EL2 specially Message-ID: References: <20211129200150.351436-1-maz@kernel.org> <20211129200150.351436-20-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211129200150.351436-20-maz@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:01:00PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > SPSR_EL2 needs special attention when running nested on ARMv8.3: > > If taking an exception while running at vEL2 (actually EL1), the > HW will update the SPSR_EL1 register with the EL1 mode. We need > to track this in order to make sure that accesses to the virtual > view of SPSR_EL2 is correct. > > To do so, we place an illegal value in SPSR_EL1.M, and patch it > accordingly if required when accessing it. When KVM runs a L1 guest hypervisor with hardware HCR_EL2.NV1 clear (virtual HCR_EL2.E2H set), when an exception is taken from vEL2 to vEL2, SPSR_EL1.M is automatically set to CurrentEL_EL2. But this doesn't happen when hardware NV1 is set (virtual HCR_EL2.E2H unset) and as far as I can tell this patch does the right thing to emulate it in software: Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei Thanks, Alex > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 23 +++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h > index 46c849ba281e..2db11ff3fdad 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h > @@ -241,6 +241,43 @@ static inline bool is_hyp_ctxt(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > return __is_hyp_ctxt(&vcpu->arch.ctxt); > } > > +static inline u64 __fixup_spsr_el2_write(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, u64 val) > +{ > + if (!__vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(ctxt)) { > + /* > + * Clear the .M field when writing SPSR to the CPU, so that we > + * can detect when the CPU clobbered our SPSR copy during a > + * local exception. > + */ > + val &= ~0xc; > + } > + > + return val; > +} > + > +static inline u64 __fixup_spsr_el2_read(const struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt, u64 val) > +{ > + if (__vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(ctxt)) > + return val; > + > + /* > + * SPSR.M == 0 means the CPU has not touched the SPSR, so the > + * register has still the value we saved on the last write. > + */ > + if ((val & 0xc) == 0) > + return ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, SPSR_EL2); > + > + /* > + * Otherwise there was a "local" exception on the CPU, > + * which from the guest's point of view was being taken from > + * EL2 to EL2, although it actually happened to be from > + * EL1 to EL1. > + * So we need to fix the .M field in SPSR, to make it look > + * like EL2, which is what the guest would expect. > + */ > + return (val & ~0x0c) | CurrentEL_EL2; > +} > + > /* > * The layout of SPSR for an AArch32 state is different when observed from an > * AArch64 SPSR_ELx or an AArch32 SPSR_*. This function generates the AArch32 > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > index 61596355e42d..875040bcfbe1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > @@ -133,11 +133,14 @@ u64 vcpu_read_sys_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg) > goto memory_read; > > /* > - * ELR_EL2 is special cased for now. > + * ELR_EL2 and SPSR_EL2 are special cased for now. > */ > switch (reg) { > case ELR_EL2: > return read_sysreg_el1(SYS_ELR); > + case SPSR_EL2: > + val = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SPSR); > + return __fixup_spsr_el2_read(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, val); > } > > /* > @@ -194,6 +197,10 @@ void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val, int reg) > case ELR_EL2: > write_sysreg_el1(val, SYS_ELR); > return; > + case SPSR_EL2: > + val = __fixup_spsr_el2_write(&vcpu->arch.ctxt, val); > + write_sysreg_el1(val, SYS_SPSR); > + return; > } > > /* No EL1 counterpart? We're done here.? */ > @@ -1620,6 +1627,18 @@ static bool access_sp_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > return true; > } > > +static bool access_spsr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + struct sys_reg_params *p, > + const struct sys_reg_desc *r) > +{ > + if (p->is_write) > + vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, p->regval, SPSR_EL2); > + else > + p->regval = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, SPSR_EL2); > + > + return true; > +} > + > /* > * Architected system registers. > * Important: Must be sorted ascending by Op0, Op1, CRn, CRm, Op2 > @@ -2052,7 +2071,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = { > { SYS_DESC(SYS_VTCR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, VTCR_EL2, 0 }, > > { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 }, > - { SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 }, > + { SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), access_spsr_el2, reset_val, SPSR_EL2, 0 }, > { SYS_DESC(SYS_ELR_EL2), access_rw, reset_val, ELR_EL2, 0 }, > { SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1}, > > -- > 2.30.2 >