kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, andrew.jones@linux.dev, drjones@redhat.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, jade.alglave@arm.com, ricarkol@google.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 19/27] arm/arm64: Add a setup sequence for systems that boot through EFI
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:08:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yta663UyZcP1j9t1@monolith.localdoman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220630100324.3153655-20-nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>

Hi,

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:03:16AM +0100, Nikos Nikoleris wrote:
> This change implements an alternative setup sequence for the system
> when we are booting through EFI. The memory map is discovered through
> EFI boot services and devices through ACPI.
> 
> This change is based on a change initially proposed by
> Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
> ---
>  lib/linux/efi.h     |   1 +
>  lib/arm/asm/setup.h |   2 +
>  lib/arm/setup.c     | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arm/cstart.S        |   1 +
>  arm/cstart64.S      |   1 +
>  5 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/linux/efi.h b/lib/linux/efi.h
> index 53748dd..89f9a9e 100644
> --- a/lib/linux/efi.h
> +++ b/lib/linux/efi.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ typedef guid_t efi_guid_t;
>  	(c) & 0xff, ((c) >> 8) & 0xff, d } }
>  
>  #define ACPI_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0xeb9d2d30, 0x2d88, 0x11d3, 0x9a, 0x16, 0x00, 0x90, 0x27, 0x3f, 0xc1, 0x4d)
> +#define ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0x8868e871, 0xe4f1, 0x11d3,  0xbc, 0x22, 0x00, 0x80, 0xc7, 0x3c, 0x88, 0x81)
>  
>  #define LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL_GUID EFI_GUID(0x5b1b31a1, 0x9562, 0x11d2,  0x8e, 0x3f, 0x00, 0xa0, 0xc9, 0x69, 0x72, 0x3b)
>  
> diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/setup.h b/lib/arm/asm/setup.h
> index 64cd379..c4cd485 100644
> --- a/lib/arm/asm/setup.h
> +++ b/lib/arm/asm/setup.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>   * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.
>   */
>  #include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <efi.h>
>  #include <asm/page.h>
>  #include <asm/pgtable-hwdef.h>
>  
> @@ -37,5 +38,6 @@ extern unsigned int mem_region_get_flags(phys_addr_t paddr);
>  #define SMP_CACHE_BYTES		L1_CACHE_BYTES
>  
>  void setup(const void *fdt, phys_addr_t freemem_start);
> +efi_status_t setup_efi(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo);
>  
>  #endif /* _ASMARM_SETUP_H_ */
> diff --git a/lib/arm/setup.c b/lib/arm/setup.c
> index 13513d0..30d04d0 100644
> --- a/lib/arm/setup.c
> +++ b/lib/arm/setup.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>  #define NR_EXTRA_MEM_REGIONS	16
>  #define NR_INITIAL_MEM_REGIONS	(MAX_DT_MEM_REGIONS + NR_EXTRA_MEM_REGIONS)
>  
> -extern unsigned long _etext;
> +extern unsigned long _text, _etext, _data, _edata;
>  
>  char *initrd;
>  u32 initrd_size;
> @@ -44,7 +44,10 @@ int nr_cpus;
>  
>  static struct mem_region __initial_mem_regions[NR_INITIAL_MEM_REGIONS + 1];
>  struct mem_region *mem_regions = __initial_mem_regions;
> -phys_addr_t __phys_offset, __phys_end;
> +phys_addr_t __phys_offset = (phys_addr_t)-1, __phys_end = 0;
> +
> +extern void exceptions_init(void);
> +extern void asm_mmu_disable(void);
>  
>  int mpidr_to_cpu(uint64_t mpidr)
>  {
> @@ -272,3 +275,177 @@ void setup(const void *fdt, phys_addr_t freemem_start)
>  	if (!(auxinfo.flags & AUXINFO_MMU_OFF))
>  		setup_vm();
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> +
> +#include <efi.h>
> +
> +static efi_status_t setup_rsdp(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
> +{
> +	efi_status_t status;
> +	struct rsdp_descriptor *rsdp;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * RSDP resides in an EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY region, which is not used
> +	 * by kvm-unit-tests arm64 memory allocator. So it is not necessary to
> +	 * copy the data structure to another memory region to prevent
> +	 * unintentional overwrite.
> +	 */
> +	status = efi_get_system_config_table(ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID, (void **)&rsdp);
> +	if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
> +		return status;
> +
> +	set_efi_rsdp(rsdp);
> +
> +	return EFI_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static efi_status_t efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	unsigned long free_mem_pages = 0;
> +	unsigned long free_mem_start = 0;
> +	struct efi_boot_memmap *map = &(efi_bootinfo->mem_map);
> +	efi_memory_desc_t *buffer = *map->map;
> +	efi_memory_desc_t *d = NULL;
> +	phys_addr_t base, top;
> +	struct mem_region *r;
> +	uintptr_t text = (uintptr_t)&_text, etext = __ALIGN((uintptr_t)&_etext, 4096);
> +	uintptr_t data = (uintptr_t)&_data, edata = __ALIGN((uintptr_t)&_edata, 4096);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Record the largest free EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY region
> +	 * which will be used to set up the memory allocator, so that
> +	 * the memory allocator can work in the largest free
> +	 * continuous memory region.
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0, r = &mem_regions[0]; i < *(map->map_size); i += *(map->desc_size), ++r) {
> +		d = (efi_memory_desc_t *)(&((u8 *)buffer)[i]);
> +
> +		r->start = d->phys_addr;
> +		r->end = d->phys_addr + d->num_pages * EFI_PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> +		switch (d->type) {
> +		case EFI_RESERVED_TYPE:
> +		case EFI_LOADER_DATA:
> +		case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE:
> +		case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA:
> +		case EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE:
> +		case EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA:
> +		case EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY:
> +		case EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY:
> +		case EFI_ACPI_MEMORY_NVS:
> +		case EFI_PAL_CODE:
> +			r->flags = MR_F_RESERVED;
> +			break;
> +		case EFI_MEMORY_MAPPED_IO:
> +		case EFI_MEMORY_MAPPED_IO_PORT_SPACE:
> +			r->flags = MR_F_IO;
> +			break;
> +		case EFI_LOADER_CODE:
> +			if (r->start <= text && r->end > text) {
> +				/* This is the unit test region. Flag the code separately. */
> +				phys_addr_t tmp = r->end;
> +
> +				assert(etext <= data);
> +				assert(edata <= r->end);
> +				r->flags = MR_F_CODE;
> +				r->end = data;
> +				++r;
> +				r->start = data;
> +				r->end = tmp;
> +			} else {
> +				r->flags = MR_F_RESERVED;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +		case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY:
> +			if (free_mem_pages < d->num_pages) {
> +				free_mem_pages = d->num_pages;
> +				free_mem_start = d->phys_addr;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!(r->flags & MR_F_IO)) {
> +			if (r->start < __phys_offset)
> +				__phys_offset = r->start;
> +			if (r->end > __phys_end)
> +				__phys_end = r->end;

What happens if there are holes between __phys_offset and __phys_end? The
boot path for KVM makes sure there are no holes. Wouldn't asm_mmu_disable()
trigger a translation fault if the address is not mapped because it
corresponds to a hole in the EFI provided memory map?

What happens if the region [__phys_offset, __phys_end) contains one of the
EFI reserved memory types? That's not really something that kvm-unit-tests
should be poking.

The efi boot code path changes the semantics for __phys_offset and
__phys_end, and that's a recipe for introducing bugs.

I would suggest changing __phys_offset and __phys_end to represent
something that applies to both the KVM boot path and the EFI boot path.

One idea that occured to me would be to have separate text, data and
available memory regions.  Have __phys_offset and __phys_end express the
start and end of the largest contiguous memory region, and initialize the
memory allocator from this region. That will also pave the way for handling
multiple memory regions from the DT.

Or, if you can prove and EFI_LOADER_CODE is always adjacent to
EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY, you can have __phys_offset and __phys_end describe
the region from the start of text to the end of EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY.

Thoughts? Suggestions?

Thanks,
Alex

> +		}
> +	}
> +	__phys_end &= PHYS_MASK;
> +	asm_mmu_disable();
> +
> +	if (free_mem_pages == 0)
> +		return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
> +
> +	assert(sizeof(long) == 8 || free_mem_start < (3ul << 30));
> +
> +	phys_alloc_init(free_mem_start, free_mem_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT);
> +	phys_alloc_set_minimum_alignment(SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> +
> +	phys_alloc_get_unused(&base, &top);
> +	base = PAGE_ALIGN(base);
> +	top = top & PAGE_MASK;
> +	assert(sizeof(long) == 8 || !(base >> 32));
> +	if (sizeof(long) != 8 && (top >> 32) != 0)
> +		top = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
> +	page_alloc_init_area(0, base >> PAGE_SHIFT, top >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +	page_alloc_ops_enable();
> +
> +	return EFI_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +efi_status_t setup_efi(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo)
> +{
> +	efi_status_t status;
> +
> +	struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info();
> +
> +	memset(ti, 0, sizeof(*ti));
> +
> +	exceptions_init();
> +
> +	status = efi_mem_init(efi_bootinfo);
> +	if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> +		printf("Failed to initialize memory: ");
> +		switch (status) {
> +		case EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES:
> +			printf("No free memory region\n");
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			printf("Unknown error\n");
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		return status;
> +	}
> +
> +	status = setup_rsdp(efi_bootinfo);
> +	if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> +		printf("Cannot find RSDP in EFI system table\n");
> +		return status;
> +	}
> +
> +	psci_set_conduit();
> +	cpu_init();
> +	/* cpu_init must be called before thread_info_init */
> +	thread_info_init(current_thread_info(), 0);
> +	/* mem_init must be called before io_init */
> +	io_init();
> +
> +	timer_save_state();
> +	if (initrd) {
> +		/* environ is currently the only file in the initrd */
> +		char *env = malloc(initrd_size);
> +
> +		memcpy(env, initrd, initrd_size);
> +		setup_env(env, initrd_size);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!(auxinfo.flags & AUXINFO_MMU_OFF))
> +		setup_vm();
> +
> +	return EFI_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arm/cstart.S b/arm/cstart.S
> index dc324c5..66a55b9 100644
> --- a/arm/cstart.S
> +++ b/arm/cstart.S
> @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ asm_mmu_disable:
>   *
>   * Input r0 is the stack top, which is the exception stacks base
>   */
> +.globl exceptions_init
>  exceptions_init:
>  	mrc	p15, 0, r2, c1, c0, 0	@ read SCTLR
>  	bic	r2, #CR_V		@ SCTLR.V := 0
> diff --git a/arm/cstart64.S b/arm/cstart64.S
> index 390feb9..55b41ea 100644
> --- a/arm/cstart64.S
> +++ b/arm/cstart64.S
> @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ asm_mmu_disable:
>   * Vectors
>   */
>  
> +.globl exceptions_init
>  exceptions_init:
>  	adrp	x4, vector_table
>  	add	x4, x4, :lo12:vector_table
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-19 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-30 10:02 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/27] EFI and ACPI support for arm64 Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:02 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/27] lib: Fix style for acpi.{c,h} Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-01  9:27   ` Andrew Jones
2022-07-01  9:52     ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-01 10:12       ` Andrew Jones
2022-06-30 10:02 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/27] x86: Avoid references to fields of ACPI tables Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/27] lib: Ensure all struct definition for ACPI tables are packed Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-01  9:35   ` Andrew Jones
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/27] lib: Add support for the XSDT ACPI table Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-01  9:49   ` Andrew Jones
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/27] lib: Extend the definition of the ACPI table FADT Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/27] devicetree: Check if fdt is NULL before returning that a DT is available Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-01  9:55   ` Andrew Jones
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/27] arm/arm64: Add support for setting up the PSCI conduit through ACPI Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/27] arm/arm64: Add support for discovering the UART " Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/27] arm/arm64: Add support for timer initialization " Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/27] arm/arm64: Add support for cpu " Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 11/27] arm/arm64: Add support for gic " Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 12/27] lib/printf: Support for precision modifier in printf Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/27] lib/printf: Add support for printing wide strings Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 14/27] lib/efi: Add support for getting the cmdline Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 15/27] arm/arm64: mmu_disable: Clean and invalidate before disabling Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:20   ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-06-30 11:08     ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 11:24       ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-06-30 15:16         ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 15:57           ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-07-01  9:12             ` Andrew Jones
2022-07-01 10:24               ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-07-01 11:16                 ` Andrew Jones
2022-07-11 14:23                   ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-07-01 11:34                 ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-01 14:39                   ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-07-01 10:36           ` Andrew Jones
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 16/27] arm/arm64: Rename etext to _etext Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 17/27] lib: Avoid ms_abi for calls related to EFI on arm64 Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 18/27] arm64: Add a new type of memory type flag MR_F_RESERVED Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 19/27] arm/arm64: Add a setup sequence for systems that boot through EFI Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:54   ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-07-19 14:08   ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2022-08-12 14:34     ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 20/27] arm64: Copy code from GNU-EFI Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 21/27] arm64: Change GNU-EFI imported file to use defined types Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 22/27] arm64: Use code from the gnu-efi when booting with EFI Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-01  0:43   ` Ricardo Koller
2022-07-04  9:18     ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 23/27] lib: Avoid external dependency in libelf Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 24/27] x86: Move x86_64-specific EFI CFLAGS to x86_64 Makefile Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 25/27] arm64: Add support for efi in Makefile Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-12 13:39   ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-07-12 20:50     ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-13  8:46       ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-07-13  9:17         ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-15 13:59           ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 26/27] lib: arm: Print test exit status Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-01 10:48   ` Andrew Jones
2022-06-30 10:03 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 27/27] arm64: Add an efi/run script Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-19 15:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/27] EFI and ACPI support for arm64 Alexandru Elisei
2022-07-22 10:57   ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-07-22 14:41     ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-08-01 18:23       ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-08-02 10:19         ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-08-02 10:46           ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-03 12:51             ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-08-09 11:16 ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-08-09 15:29   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-10  9:17     ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-08-10 14:58       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-10 15:04         ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-08-09 16:09   ` Nikos Nikoleris
2022-08-12 14:55     ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-08-12 15:49       ` Nikos Nikoleris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yta663UyZcP1j9t1@monolith.localdoman \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=jade.alglave@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikos.nikoleris@arm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).