kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong start gfn of tlb flushing with range
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 11:25:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxjiJougYfG1seBT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <888399c78eab9d965657c5983f8096c707664c30.1661331396.git.houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 05:29:21PM +0800, Hou Wenlong wrote:
> When a spte is dropped, the start gfn of tlb flushing should
> be the gfn of spte not the base gfn of SP which contains the
> spte. Also introduce a helper function to do range-based
> flushing when a spte is dropped, which would help prevent
> future buggy use of kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address() in
> such case.
> 
> Fixes: c3134ce240eed ("KVM: Replace old tlb flush function with new one to flush a specified range.")
> Suggested-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c         | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h |  3 +--
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 3bcff56df109..e0b9432b9491 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -260,6 +260,18 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_range(kvm, &range);
>  }
>  
> +static gfn_t kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index);
> +
> +/* Flush the range of guest memory mapped by the given SPTE. */
> +static void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_sptep(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = sptep_to_sp(sptep);
> +	gfn_t gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, spte_index(sptep));
> +
> +	kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, gfn,
> +					   KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));

How is the range-based TLB flushing supposed to work with indirect MMUs?
When KVM is using shadow paging, the gfn here is not part of the actual
translation.

For example, when TDP is disabled, KVM's shadow page tables translate
GVA to HPA. When Nested Virtualization is in use and running L2, KVM's
shadow page tables translate nGPA to HPA.

Ah, I see x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush_with_range is only set when running
on Hyper-V and TDP is enabled (VMX checks enable_ept and SVM checks
npt_enabled). But it looks like the nested case might still be broken?

> +}
> +
>  /* Flush all memory mapped by the given direct SP. */
>  static void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_direct_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>  {
> @@ -1156,8 +1168,7 @@ static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, bool flush)
>  	drop_spte(kvm, sptep);
>  
>  	if (flush)
> -		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, sp->gfn,
> -			KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
> +		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_sptep(kvm, sptep);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1608,7 +1619,7 @@ static void __rmap_add(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	if (rmap_count > RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD) {
>  		kvm_zap_all_rmap_sptes(kvm, rmap_head);
>  		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(
> -				kvm, sp->gfn, KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
> +				kvm, gfn, KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -6402,8 +6413,7 @@ static bool kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte(struct kvm *kvm,
>  			kvm_zap_one_rmap_spte(kvm, rmap_head, sptep);
>  
>  			if (kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range())
> -				kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, sp->gfn,
> -					KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
> +				kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_sptep(kvm, sptep);
>  			else
>  				need_tlb_flush = 1;
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> index 39e0205e7300..04149c704d5b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> @@ -937,8 +937,7 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, hpa_t root_hpa)
>  
>  			mmu_page_zap_pte(vcpu->kvm, sp, sptep, NULL);
>  			if (is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
> -				kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(vcpu->kvm,
> -					sp->gfn, KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
> +				kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_sptep(vcpu->kvm, sptep);
>  
>  			if (!rmap_can_add(vcpu))
>  				break;
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-07 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-24  9:29 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong usages of range-based tlb flushing Hou Wenlong
2022-08-24  9:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong gfn range of tlb flushing in validate_direct_spte() Hou Wenlong
2022-09-07 17:43   ` David Matlack
2022-09-13 12:07     ` Hou Wenlong
2022-09-15 11:47       ` Liam Ni
2022-09-16  2:49         ` Hou Wenlong
2022-09-20 18:08         ` David Matlack
2022-09-18 13:11   ` Robert Hoo
2022-09-20 18:32     ` David Matlack
2022-09-20 18:44       ` David Matlack
2022-09-27  2:54         ` Robert Hoo
2022-09-27 16:44           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-24  9:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong gfn range of tlb flushing in kvm_set_pte_rmapp() Hou Wenlong
2022-09-07 17:50   ` David Matlack
2022-08-24  9:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Reduce gfn range of tlb flushing in tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level() Hou Wenlong
2022-09-07 17:58   ` David Matlack
2022-08-24  9:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix wrong start gfn of tlb flushing with range Hou Wenlong
2022-09-07 18:25   ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-09-13 12:50     ` Hou Wenlong
2022-08-24  9:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce helper function to do range-based flushing for given page Hou Wenlong
2022-08-24  9:29 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Use 1 as the size of gfn range for tlb flushing in FNAME(invlpg)() Hou Wenlong
2022-09-07 17:40   ` David Matlack
2022-09-13 12:58     ` Hou Wenlong
2022-09-13 13:57       ` David Matlack
2022-09-16 19:33         ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YxjiJougYfG1seBT@google.com \
    --to=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).