From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, <lushenming@huawei.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add feature detection for HTTU
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:42:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a07eee49-e997-8e7a-f510-64d23b9c9b98@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YB0VErwkA0ivRXTd@myrica>
Hi Jean,
On 2021/2/5 17:51, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hi Keqian,
>
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 05:13:50PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote:
>>> We need to accommodate the firmware override as well if we need this to be meaningful. Jean-Philippe is already carrying a suitable patch in the SVA stack[1].
>> Robin, Thanks for pointing it out.
>>
>> Jean, I see that the IORT HTTU flag overrides the hardware register info unconditionally. I have some concern about it:
>>
>> If the override flag has HTTU but hardware doesn't support it, then driver will use this feature but receive access fault or permission fault from SMMU unexpectedly.
>> 1) If IOPF is not supported, then kernel can not work normally.
>> 2) If IOPF is supported, kernel will perform useless actions, such as HTTU based dma dirty tracking (this series).
>>
>> As the IORT spec doesn't give an explicit explanation for HTTU override, can we comprehend it as a mask for HTTU related hardware register?
>
> To me "Overrides the value of SMMU_IDR0.HTTU" is clear enough: disregard
> the value of SMMU_IDR0.HTTU and use the one specified by IORT instead. And
> that's both ways, since there is no validity mask for the IORT value: if
> there is an IORT table, always ignore SMMU_IDR0.HTTU.
>
> That's how the SMMU driver implements the COHACC bit, which has the same
> wording in IORT. So I think we should implement HTTU the same way.
OK, and Robin said that the latest IORT spec literally states it.
>
> One complication is that there is no equivalent override for device tree.
> I think it can be added later if necessary, because unlike IORT it can be
> tri state (property not present, overriden positive, overridden negative).
Yeah, that would be more flexible. ;-)
>
> Thanks,
> Jean
>
> .
>
Thanks,
Keqian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-07 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 15:17 [RFC PATCH 00/11] vfio/iommu_type1: Implement dirty log tracking based on smmuv3 HTTU Keqian Zhu
2021-01-28 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add feature detection for HTTU Keqian Zhu
2021-02-04 19:50 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-05 9:13 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-05 9:51 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-02-07 1:42 ` Keqian Zhu [this message]
2021-02-05 11:48 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-05 16:11 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-07 1:56 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-07 2:19 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-03-02 7:42 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-28 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable HTTU for SMMU stage1 mapping Keqian Zhu
2021-01-28 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add feature detection for BBML Keqian Zhu
2021-01-28 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Split block descriptor to a span of page Keqian Zhu
2021-02-04 19:51 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-07 8:18 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-28 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Merge a span of page to block descriptor Keqian Zhu
2021-02-04 19:52 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-07 12:13 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-28 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Scan leaf TTD to sync hardware dirty log Keqian Zhu
2021-02-04 19:52 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-07 12:41 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-08 1:17 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-01-28 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Clear dirty log according to bitmap Keqian Zhu
2021-01-28 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add HWDBM device feature reporting Keqian Zhu
2021-01-28 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] vfio/iommu_type1: Add HWDBM status maintanance Keqian Zhu
2021-01-28 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] vfio/iommu_type1: Optimize dirty bitmap population based on iommu HWDBM Keqian Zhu
2021-02-07 9:56 ` Yi Sun
2021-02-07 10:40 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-09 11:57 ` Yi Sun
2021-02-09 12:08 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-18 1:17 ` Keqian Zhu
2021-02-09 11:16 ` Robin Murphy
2021-02-09 12:02 ` Yi Sun
2021-01-28 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] vfio/iommu_type1: Add support for manual dirty log clear Keqian Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a07eee49-e997-8e7a-f510-64d23b9c9b98@huawei.com \
--to=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lushenming@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).