kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: "kvm list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: nVMX: Check GUEST_DR7 on vmentry of nested guests
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 16:07:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4882749-a5cc-f8cd-4641-dd61314e6312@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALMp9eSekWEvvgwhMXWOtRZG1saQDOaKr+_4AacuM9JtH5guww@mail.gmail.com>



On 08/29/2019 03:26 PM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:25 PM Krish Sadhukhan
> <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com> wrote:
>> According to section "Checks on Guest Control Registers, Debug Registers, and
>> and MSRs" in Intel SDM vol 3C, the following checks are performed on vmentry
>> of nested guests:
>>
>>      If the "load debug controls" VM-entry control is 1, bits 63:32 in the DR7
>>      field must be 0.
> Can't we just let the hardware check guest DR7? This results in
> "VM-entry failure due to invalid guest state," right? And we just
> reflect that to L1?

Just trying to understand the reason why this particular check can be 
deferred to the hardware.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-30 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-29 20:56 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: nVMX: Check GUEST_DEBUGCTL and GUEST_DR7 on vmentry of nested guests Krish Sadhukhan
2019-08-29 20:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: nVMX: Check GUEST_DEBUGCTL " Krish Sadhukhan
2019-08-29 22:12   ` Jim Mattson
2019-08-30 23:26     ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-09-01 23:55       ` Jim Mattson
2019-08-29 20:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: nVMX: Check GUEST_DR7 " Krish Sadhukhan
2019-08-29 22:26   ` Jim Mattson
2019-08-30 23:07     ` Krish Sadhukhan [this message]
2019-08-30 23:15       ` Jim Mattson
2019-09-02  0:33         ` Jim Mattson
     [not found]           ` <e229bea2-acb2-e268-6281-d8e467c3282e@oracle.com>
2019-09-04 16:44             ` Jim Mattson
2019-09-04 16:58               ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-04 18:05               ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-09-04 18:20                 ` Jim Mattson
2019-09-09  4:11                   ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-09-09 15:56                     ` Jim Mattson
2019-09-04 17:14           ` Sean Christopherson
2019-12-20 23:45         ` Jim Mattson
2019-12-21  0:27   ` Jim Mattson
2019-08-29 20:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] kvm-unit-test: nVMX: __enter_guest() should not set "launched" state when VM-entry fails Krish Sadhukhan
2019-09-04 15:42   ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-13 20:37     ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-09-13 21:06       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-09-16 19:12         ` Krish Sadhukhan
2019-08-29 20:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] kvm-unit-test: nVMX: Check GUEST_DEBUGCTL and GUEST_DR7 on vmentry of nested guests Krish Sadhukhan
2019-08-29 23:17   ` Jim Mattson
2019-08-30  1:12     ` Nadav Amit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4882749-a5cc-f8cd-4641-dd61314e6312@oracle.com \
    --to=krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).