kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
	Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 26/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow enabling / disabling dirty logging under MMU read lock
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:38:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0829378-6991-4f59-273d-db58057d7cb8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202185734.1680553-27-bgardon@google.com>

On 02/02/21 19:57, Ben Gardon wrote:
> To reduce lock contention and interference with page fault handlers,
> allow the TDP MMU functions which enable and disable dirty logging
> to operate under the MMU read lock.
> 
> 
> Extend dirty logging enable disable functions read lock-ness
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c     | 14 +++---
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h |  2 +-
>   3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index e3cf868be6bd..6ba2a72d4330 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -5638,9 +5638,10 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_leaf_clear_dirty(struct kvm *kvm,
>   
>   	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>   	flush = slot_handle_leaf(kvm, memslot, __rmap_clear_dirty, false);
> +	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
>   	if (kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_enabled)
>   		flush |= kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_slot(kvm, memslot);
> -	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * It's also safe to flush TLBs out of mmu lock here as currently this
> @@ -5661,9 +5662,10 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_largepage_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm,
>   	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>   	flush = slot_handle_large_level(kvm, memslot, slot_rmap_write_protect,
>   					false);
> +	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
>   	if (kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_enabled)
>   		flush |= kvm_tdp_mmu_wrprot_slot(kvm, memslot, PG_LEVEL_2M);
> -	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>   
>   	if (flush)
>   		kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot);
> @@ -5677,12 +5679,12 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_set_dirty(struct kvm *kvm,
>   
>   	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>   	flush = slot_handle_all_level(kvm, memslot, __rmap_set_dirty, false);
> -	if (kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_enabled)
> -		flush |= kvm_tdp_mmu_slot_set_dirty(kvm, memslot);
> -	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> -
>   	if (flush)
>   		kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot);
> +	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> +	if (kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_enabled)
> +		kvm_tdp_mmu_slot_set_dirty(kvm, memslot);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_slot_set_dirty);
>   
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index cfe66b8d39fa..6093926a6bc5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -553,18 +553,22 @@ static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
>   }
>   
>   /*
> - * tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic - Set a TDP MMU SPTE atomically and handle the
> + * __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic - Set a TDP MMU SPTE atomically and handle the
>    * associated bookkeeping
>    *
>    * @kvm: kvm instance
>    * @iter: a tdp_iter instance currently on the SPTE that should be set
>    * @new_spte: The value the SPTE should be set to
> + * @record_dirty_log: Record the page as dirty in the dirty bitmap if
> + *		      appropriate for the change being made. Should be set
> + *		      unless performing certain dirty logging operations.
> + *		      Leaving record_dirty_log unset in that case prevents page
> + *		      writes from being double counted.
>    * Returns: true if the SPTE was set, false if it was not. If false is returned,
>    *	    this function will have no side-effects.
>    */
> -static inline bool tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
> -					   struct tdp_iter *iter,
> -					   u64 new_spte)
> +static inline bool __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
> +		struct tdp_iter *iter, u64 new_spte, bool record_dirty_log)

Instead of adding the bool argument, just name this 
tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic_no_dirty_log...

>   {
>   	u64 *root_pt = tdp_iter_root_pt(iter);
>   	struct kvm_mmu_page *root = sptep_to_sp(root_pt);
> @@ -583,12 +587,31 @@ static inline bool tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
>   		      new_spte) != iter->old_spte)
>   		return false;
>   
> -	handle_changed_spte(kvm, as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte, new_spte,
> -			    iter->level, true);
> +	__handle_changed_spte(kvm, as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte, new_spte,
> +			      iter->level, true);
> +	handle_changed_spte_acc_track(iter->old_spte, new_spte, iter->level);
> +	if (record_dirty_log)
> +		handle_changed_spte_dirty_log(kvm, as_id, iter->gfn,
> +					      iter->old_spte, new_spte,
> +					      iter->level);

... and tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic becomes

	if (!tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic_no_dirty_log(kvm, iter, new_spte))
		return false;

	handle_changed_spte_dirty_log(kvm, as_id, iter->gfn,
				      iter->old_spte, new_spte,
				      iter->level);
	return true;


> @@ -1301,7 +1344,8 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
>   	int root_as_id;
>   	bool spte_set = false;
>   
> -	for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, false) {
> +	read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +	for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, true) {
>   		root_as_id = kvm_mmu_page_as_id(root);
>   		if (root_as_id != slot->as_id)
>   			continue;
> @@ -1309,6 +1353,7 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
>   		spte_set |= clear_dirty_gfn_range(kvm, root, slot->base_gfn,
>   				slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
>   	}
> +	read_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

Same remark as before.

>   	return spte_set;
>   }
> @@ -1397,7 +1442,8 @@ static bool set_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>   	rcu_read_lock();
>   
>   	tdp_root_for_each_pte(iter, root, start, end) {
> -		if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, false))
> +retry:
> +		if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, true))
>   			continue;
>   
>   		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte) ||
> @@ -1406,7 +1452,14 @@ static bool set_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>   
>   		new_spte = iter.old_spte | shadow_dirty_mask;
>   
> -		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
> +		if (!tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, new_spte)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * The iter must explicitly re-read the SPTE because
> +			 * the atomic cmpxchg failed.
> +			 */
> +			iter.old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter.sptep));
> +			goto retry;
> +		}
>   		spte_set = true;

Yep, looks like that spte_set assignment should not have been removed. :)

>   	}
>   
> @@ -1417,15 +1470,15 @@ static bool set_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>   /*
>    * Set the dirty status of all the SPTEs mapping GFNs in the memslot. This is
>    * only used for PML, and so will involve setting the dirty bit on each SPTE.
> - * Returns true if an SPTE has been changed and the TLBs need to be flushed.
>    */
> -bool kvm_tdp_mmu_slot_set_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +void kvm_tdp_mmu_slot_set_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
>   {
>   	struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
>   	int root_as_id;
>   	bool spte_set = false;
>   
> -	for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, false) {
> +	read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

And again here.

Paolo

> +	for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, true) {
>   		root_as_id = kvm_mmu_page_as_id(root);
>   		if (root_as_id != slot->as_id)
>   			continue;
> @@ -1433,7 +1486,11 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_slot_set_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
>   		spte_set |= set_dirty_gfn_range(kvm, root, slot->base_gfn,
>   				slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
>   	}
> -	return spte_set;
> +
> +	if (spte_set)
> +		kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
> +
> +	read_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>   }
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> index 10ada884270b..848b41b20985 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
>   				       struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>   				       gfn_t gfn, unsigned long mask,
>   				       bool wrprot);
> -bool kvm_tdp_mmu_slot_set_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
> +void kvm_tdp_mmu_slot_set_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
>   void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
>   				       const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
>   
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-03 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02 18:57 [PATCH v2 00/28] Allow parallel MMU operations with TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] KVM: x86/mmu: change TDP MMU yield function returns to match cond_resched Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add comment on __tdp_mmu_set_spte Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add lockdep when setting a TDP MMU SPTE Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't redundantly clear TDP MMU pt memory Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out handling of removed page tables Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] locking/rwlocks: Add contention detection for rwlocks Ben Gardon
2021-02-09 20:39   ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-09 21:46     ` Waiman Long
2021-02-09 22:25       ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-10  0:27         ` Waiman Long
2021-02-10  0:41           ` Waiman Long
2021-02-10  6:04           ` Guenter Roeck
2021-02-10 14:57             ` Waiman Long
2021-02-10  3:32   ` Waiman Long
2021-02-10 15:15     ` Waiman Long
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] sched: Add needbreak " Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] sched: Add cond_resched_rwlock Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix braces in kvm_recover_nx_lpages Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix TDP MMU zap collapsible SPTEs Ben Gardon
2021-02-03  9:43   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Merge flush and non-flush tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename goal_gfn to next_last_level_gfn Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure forward progress when yielding in TDP MMU iter Ben Gardon
2021-02-05 23:42   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip no-op changes in TDP MMU functions Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Clear dirtied pages mask bit before early break Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect TDP MMU page table memory with RCU Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Use an rwlock for the x86 MMU Ben Gardon
     [not found]   ` <c8aa8f9c-2305-5d58-3b48-261663524ad5@redhat.com>
     [not found]     ` <CANgfPd_RxhBwM95MQQmGOdtmeH8c6=zPqUnXXHNV5Ta0R5R=iw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-02-03 18:14       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out functions to add/remove TDP MMU pages Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Use atomic ops to set SPTEs in TDP MMU map Ben Gardon
2021-02-03  2:48   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-03 11:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-06  0:26     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-08 10:32       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 10:32   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 16:50     ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-01 17:32       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 18:09         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Flush TLBs after zap in TDP MMU PF handler Ben Gardon
2021-02-06  0:29   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Mark SPTEs in disconnected pages as removed Ben Gardon
2021-02-03 11:17   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow parallel page faults for the TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-02-03 12:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-03 17:46     ` Ben Gardon
2021-02-03 18:30       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-06  0:12         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow zap gfn range to operate under the mmu read lock Ben Gardon
2021-02-03 11:25   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-03 11:26   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-03 18:31     ` Ben Gardon
2021-02-03 18:32       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow zapping collapsible SPTEs to use MMU " Ben Gardon
2021-02-03 11:34   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-03 18:51     ` Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow enabling / disabling dirty logging under " Ben Gardon
2021-02-03 11:38   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 27/28] KVM: selftests: Add backing src parameter to dirty_log_perf_test Ben Gardon
2021-02-02 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 28/28] KVM: selftests: Disable dirty logging with vCPUs running Ben Gardon
2021-02-03 10:07   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-03 11:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/28] Allow parallel MMU operations with TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-03 17:54   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-03 18:13     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b0829378-6991-4f59-273d-db58057d7cb8@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfeiner@google.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    --cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).