From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30411C433E0 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 17:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD522073B for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 17:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="Bi3iZMPR" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727869AbgE2R6N (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 13:58:13 -0400 Received: from hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:5391 "EHLO hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726849AbgE2R6M (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 13:58:12 -0400 Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:58:00 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Fri, 29 May 2020 10:58:12 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Fri, 29 May 2020 10:58:12 -0700 Received: from [10.40.100.117] (172.20.13.39) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 29 May 2020 17:57:57 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH Kernel v22 0/8] Add UAPIs to support migration for VFIO devices To: Alex Williamson , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" CC: Yan Zhao , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <1589781397-28368-1-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com> <20200519105804.02f3cae8@x1.home> <20200525065925.GA698@joy-OptiPlex-7040> <426a5314-6d67-7cbe-bad0-e32f11d304ea@nvidia.com> <20200526141939.2632f100@x1.home> <20200527062358.GD19560@joy-OptiPlex-7040> <20200527084822.GC3001@work-vm> <20200528165906.7d03f689@x1.home> X-Nvconfidentiality: public From: Kirti Wankhede Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 23:27:53 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200528165906.7d03f689@x1.home> X-Originating-IP: [172.20.13.39] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1590775080; bh=9rTtu3kf9bEqSZ338TiGiLKhOLfMIwfqgDH96m+5MN0=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:X-Nvconfidentiality:From: Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Bi3iZMPRJkmpjpq4uCCp3csVA1rvg7ZAooXAbf73Z5wpp6GqG5UlV+dgG5faUiSJK /yJWHLGfqUOR7J0AB+ts4MWUeVF2yyzyB5c5eNsswzJ/9aBbgif4+VdnQlymTNaQli SToQlEnwJHQ9t5iGeOm5l9m3BRx2Yskol1AOY57tt7H7iXnVtk1MXGtk2aSnr3rSCg lgCxbsxLxyPPDr4A4xchIphUrNM0jelpn536XpUgSs+r84gS79kC3WcRKLsLlRfZrl VhwQexmuvf8rKvmy1F5NQM2xjVp+fLAtezFTrlMGGMjKVm6ZgpJC7XhLy9IlxIQxQR IR6TwBLCqeyqA== Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 5/29/2020 4:29 AM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 27 May 2020 09:48:22 +0100 > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote: >> * Yan Zhao (yan.y.zhao@intel.com) wrote: >>> BTW, for viommu, the downtime data is as below. under the same network >>> condition and guest memory size, and no running dirty data/memory produced >>> by device. >>> (1) viommu off >>> single-round dirty query: downtime ~100ms >> >> Fine. >> >>> (2) viommu on >>> single-round dirty query: downtime 58s >> >> Youch. > > Double Youch! But we believe this is because we're getting the dirty > bitmap one IOMMU leaf page at a time, right? We've enable the kernel > to get a dirty bitmap across multiple mappings, but QEMU isn't yet > taking advantage of it. Do I have this correct? Thanks, > That's correct. Thanks, Kirti