From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F8BC2B9F7 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 12:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDCC613CE for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 12:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233829AbhEZMRo (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 08:17:44 -0400 Received: from mx12.kaspersky-labs.com ([91.103.66.155]:46260 "EHLO mx12.kaspersky-labs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232546AbhEZMRm (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 08:17:42 -0400 Received: from relay12.kaspersky-labs.com (unknown [127.0.0.10]) by relay12.kaspersky-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1635677034; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:16:09 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaspersky.com; s=mail202102; t=1622031369; bh=sUAg7c0OJaDV8893akfTQUnFA9//98ey29nrJI7rLlk=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bXc+5kW4ZAA5MnQRMLVFqfJU/asSbIkOyQ/WQ9lUS+FAsFLzMBT33L+JJ9fEulXrK niYQfTvwUZ3Fcjr6XG9eLM86//TZaeOiMTgd2K8z/twUlZm9hpCctJUsU3vSEIhpEo aNP2m2JMwfgMNVoJ6Dp33co8q1smJO//pdDD0AAnZRD4fFp8Y6EXpVqrGtasrCUFTb Jpl28Fce2vKtXzJjlYsmXqKCDHSFlQFk1T4MBO/9lPA9QMngbXnc4e56+JUfcHMxD7 yEf178axo514r1vCZ8HalGs8l3z/nmveKcfpcXQtIeZaZ+2t9sFxtevK5+BqVFOE8Q sSatzWMzf4SRQ== Received: from mail-hq2.kaspersky.com (unknown [91.103.66.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail-hq2.kaspersky.com", Issuer "Kaspersky MailRelays CA G3" (verified OK)) by mailhub12.kaspersky-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 451607704D; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:16:08 +0300 (MSK) Received: from [10.16.171.77] (10.64.68.128) by hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.14; Wed, 26 May 2021 15:16:07 +0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/18] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support To: Stefano Garzarella CC: Stefan Hajnoczi , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jorgen Hansen , Colin Ian King , Norbert Slusarek , Andra Paraschiv , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "oxffffaa@gmail.com" References: <20210520191357.1270473-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> <20210521075520.ghg75wpzz42zorxg@steredhat> <108b0bba-5909-cdde-97ee-321b3f5351ca@kaspersky.com> <20210525145220.amzme5mqqv4npirt@steredhat> From: Arseny Krasnov Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 15:16:07 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210525145220.amzme5mqqv4npirt@steredhat> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.64.68.128] X-ClientProxiedBy: hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) To hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) X-KSE-ServerInfo: hqmailmbx3.avp.ru, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-AntiSpam-Version: 5.9.20, Database issued on: 05/26/2021 12:06:35 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Status: KAS_STATUS_NOT_DETECTED X-KSE-AntiSpam-Method: none X-KSE-AntiSpam-Rate: 0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Lua profiles 163941 [May 26 2021] X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Version: 5.9.20.0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Envelope from: arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: LuaCore: 448 448 71fb1b37213ce9a885768d4012c46ac449c77b17 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Tracking_uf_ne_domains} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Tracking_from_domain_doesnt_match_to} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: patchwork.kernel.org:7.1.1;kaspersky.com:7.1.1;127.0.0.199:7.1.2;lists.oasis-open.org:7.1.1;d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e.com:7.1.1 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Rate: 0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Status: not_detected X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Method: none X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Deterministic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 05/26/2021 12:08:00 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: Clean, bases: 26.05.2021 10:27:00 X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: InTheLimit X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: InTheLimit X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 52 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, bases: 2021/05/26 10:29:00 X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.3.30, bases: 2021/05/26 08:53:00 #16657861 X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 25.05.2021 17:52, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:22:09AM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: >> On 23.05.2021 15:14, Arseny Krasnov wrote: >>> On 21.05.2021 10:55, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >>>> Hi Arseny, >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:13:53PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: >>>>> This patchset implements support of SOCK_SEQPACKET for virtio >>>>> transport. >>>> I'll carefully review and test this series next Monday, in the mean time >>>> I think we should have at least an agreement about the changes that >>>> regards virtio-spec before merge this series, to avoid any compatibility >>>> issues. >>>> >>>> Do you plan to send a new version of the specification changes? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Stefano >>> Hello, sorry for long answer. I'm on vacation now, but i plan to send >>> >>> it in next several days, because with current implementation it is short >>> >>> >>> Thank You >> Hello, here is spec patch: >> >> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202105/msg00017.html >> >> Let's discuss it > Yep, sure. > > About this series I think is better to split in two series since it > became very long. Patchwork [1] also complains here [2]. > > You can send a first series with patches from 1 to 7. These patches are > reviewed by me and can go regardless of the discussion of the VIRTIO > specifications. Ok, i'll send it on next week. > Maybe you can also add the patch with the test to this first series. > > Please specify in the cover letter that the implementation for virtio > devices is under development and will be sent later. > > > When it will be merged in the net-next tree, you can post the second > part with the rest of the series that implements SEQPACKET for virtio > devices, possibly after we received an agreement for the specifications. > > Please use the "net-next" tag and take a look at > Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst about netdev development. Ok > > > Anyway, in the next days (hopefully tomorrow) I'll review the rest of > the series related to virtio devices and spec. > > Thanks, > Stefano > > [1] > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=486011&state=* > > [2] > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210520191449.1270723-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com/ > >