kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: drjones@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests RFC PATCH v2 3/5] arm64: spe: Add introspection test
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:09:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c78da5aa-f429-d651-c460-b6cc46d6f188@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66ff5a16-1771-9423-9205-5aabb4635c1b@arm.com>

Hi Alexandru,

On 10/30/20 4:59 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> On 10/30/20 3:29 PM, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Alexandru,
>>
>> On 10/27/20 6:19 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
>>> From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Probe the DTB and the ID registers to get information about SPE, then
>>> compare the register fields with the valid values as defined by ARM DDI
>>> 0487F.b.
>>>
>>> SPE is supported only on AArch64, so make the test exclusive to the
>>> arm64 architecture.
>>>
>>> [ Alexandru E: Removed aarch32 compilation support, added DTB probing,
>>> 	reworded commit, mostly cosmetic changes to the code ]all those changes make sense to me.
all those changes make sense to me (missing returned line above)
>> + spe_buffer not allocated in spe_probe() anymore.
> 
> Sure, will add that.
> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arm/Makefile.arm64 |   1 +
>>>  lib/libcflat.h     |   1 +
>>>  arm/spe.c          | 172 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  arm/unittests.cfg  |   7 ++
>>>  4 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 arm/spe.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arm/Makefile.arm64 b/arm/Makefile.arm64
>>> index dbc7524d3070..94b9c63f0b05 100644
>>> --- a/arm/Makefile.arm64
>>> +++ b/arm/Makefile.arm64
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ OBJDIRS += lib/arm64
>>>  tests = $(TEST_DIR)/timer.flat
>>>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/micro-bench.flat
>>>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/cache.flat
>>> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/spe.flat
>>>  
>>>  include $(SRCDIR)/$(TEST_DIR)/Makefile.common
>>>  
>>> diff --git a/lib/libcflat.h b/lib/libcflat.h
>>> index ec0f58b05701..37550c99ffb6 100644
>>> --- a/lib/libcflat.h
>>> +++ b/lib/libcflat.h
>>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>>>  #define IS_ALIGNED(x, a)	(((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0)
>>>  
>>>  #define SZ_256			(1 << 8)
>>> +#define SZ_2K			(1 << 11)
>>>  #define SZ_4K			(1 << 12)
>>>  #define SZ_8K			(1 << 13)
>>>  #define SZ_16K			(1 << 14)
>>> diff --git a/arm/spe.c b/arm/spe.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..c199cd239194
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arm/spe.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2020, Red Hat Inc, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>>> + * under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1 and
>>> + * only version 2.1 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
>>> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
>>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU Lesser General Public License
>>> + * for more details.
>>> + */
>>> +#include <stdint.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include <bitops.h>
>>> +#include <devicetree.h>
>>> +#include <libcflat.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include <asm/gic.h>
>>> +#include <asm/processor.h>
>>> +#include <asm/sysreg.h>
>>> +
>>> +#define ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT	32
>>> +#define ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_MASK		0xf
>>> +
>>> +#define SYS_PMBIDR_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 9, 10, 7)
>>> +#define SYS_PMBIDR_EL1_F_SHIFT		5
>>> +#define SYS_PMBIDR_EL1_P_SHIFT		4
>>> +#define SYS_PMBIDR_EL1_ALIGN_MASK	0xfUL
>>> +#define SYS_PMBIDR_EL1_ALIGN_SHIFT	0
>>> +
>>> +#define SYS_PMSIDR_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 9, 9, 7)
>>> +#define SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_FE_SHIFT		0
>>> +#define SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_FT_SHIFT		1
>>> +#define SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_FL_SHIFT		2
>>> +#define SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_INTERVAL_SHIFT	8
>>> +#define SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_INTERVAL_MASK	0xfUL
>>> +#define SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_MAXSIZE_SHIFT	12
>>> +#define SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_MAXSIZE_MASK	0xfUL
>>> +#define SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_MAXSIZE_MASK	0xfUL
>>> +#define SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_COUNTSIZE_SHIFT	16
>>> +#define SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_COUNTSIZE_MASK	0xfUL
>>> +
>>> +struct spe {
>>> +	uint32_t intid;
>>> +	int min_interval;
>>> +	int max_record_size;
>>> +	int countsize;
>>> +	bool fl_cap;
>>> +	bool ft_cap;
>>> +	bool fe_cap;
>>> +	int align;
>>> +};
>>> +static struct spe spe;
>>> +
>>> +static int spe_min_interval(uint8_t interval)
>>> +{
>>> +	switch (interval) {
>>> +	case 0x0:
>>> +		return 256;
>>> +	case 0x2:
>>> +		return 512;
>>> +	case 0x3:
>>> +		return 768;
>>> +	case 0x4:
>>> +		return 1024;
>>> +	case 0x5:
>>> +		return 1536;
>>> +	case 0x6:
>>> +		return 2048;
>>> +	case 0x7:
>>> +		return 3072;
>>> +	case 0x8:
>>> +		return 4096;
>>> +	default:
>>> +		return 0;
>>> +	}
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static bool spe_probe(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	const struct fdt_property *prop;
>>> +	const void *fdt = dt_fdt();
>>> +	int node, len;
>>> +	uint32_t *data;
>>> +	uint64_t pmbidr, pmsidr;
>>> +	uint64_t aa64dfr0 = get_id_aa64dfr0();
>>> +	uint8_t pmsver, interval;
>>> +
>>> +	node = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(fdt, -1, "arm,statistical-profiling-extension-v1");
>>> +	assert(node >= 0);
>>> +	prop = fdt_get_property(fdt, node, "interrupts", &len);
>>> +	assert(prop && len == 3 * sizeof(u32));
>>> +
>>> +	data = (u32 *)prop->data;
>>> +	/* SPE interrupt is required to be a PPI. */
>>> +	assert(fdt32_to_cpu(data[0]) == 1);
>>> +	spe.intid = fdt32_to_cpu(data[1]);
>>> +
>>> +	pmsver = (aa64dfr0 >> ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT) & ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_MASK;
>>> +	if (!pmsver || pmsver > 2) {
>>> +		report_info("Unknown SPE version: 0x%x", pmsver);
>>> +		return false;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	pmbidr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_PMBIDR_EL1);
>>> +	if (pmbidr & BIT(SYS_PMBIDR_EL1_P_SHIFT)) {
>>> +		report_info("Profiling buffer owned by higher exception level");
>>> +		return false;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	spe.align = (pmbidr >> SYS_PMBIDR_EL1_ALIGN_SHIFT) & SYS_PMBIDR_EL1_ALIGN_MASK;
>> you can remove ">> SYS_PMBIDR_EL1_ALIGN_SHIFT" here and
>> SYS_PMBIDR_EL1_ALIGN_SHIFT (0)
> 
> I prefer to keep it to match the way we extract the values for the other fields,
> even though I realize it's unnecessary (the compiler will optimize it anyway).
ok
> 
>>> +	spe.align = 1 << spe.align;
>>> +
>>> +	pmsidr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_PMSIDR_EL1);
>>> +
>>> +	interval = (pmsidr >> SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_INTERVAL_SHIFT) & SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_INTERVAL_MASK;
>>> +	spe.min_interval = spe_min_interval(interval);
>>> +
>>> +	spe.max_record_size = (pmsidr >> SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_MAXSIZE_SHIFT) & \
>>> +		      SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_MAXSIZE_MASK;
>>> +	spe.max_record_size = 1 << spe.max_record_size;
>>> +
>>> +	spe.countsize = (pmsidr >> SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_COUNTSIZE_SHIFT) & \
>>> +			SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_COUNTSIZE_MASK;
>>> +
>>> +	spe.fl_cap = pmsidr & BIT(SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_FL_SHIFT);
>>> +	spe.ft_cap = pmsidr & BIT(SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_FT_SHIFT);
>>> +	spe.fe_cap = pmsidr & BIT(SYS_PMSIDR_EL1_FE_SHIFT);
>> Why did you remove the report_info() section? I think those human
>> readable info can be useful.
> 
> I made them part of the test. Since the architecture says they are 1, I think
> making sure their value matches is more useful than printing something that the
> architecture guarantees.
OK for those caps which are always 1 anyway but I was more thinking about

report_info("Align= %d bytes, Min Interval=%d Single record Max Size =
%d bytes", spe.align, spe.min_interval, spe.maxsize);

I'd prefer to keep it.

> 
>>> +
>>> +	return true;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void spe_test_introspection(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	report_prefix_push("spe-introspection");
>> I see you moved this here. gic and pmu tests seem to leave them in the
>> main, as done originally.
> 
> You're right, consistency is good, will put them in main before calling the test
> function.
> 
>>> +
>>> +	report(spe.align <= SZ_2K, "PMBIDR_E1.Align");
>> good check added
>>> +	report(spe.countsize == 0x2, "PMSIDR_EL1.CountSize");
>>> +	report(spe.max_record_size >= 16 && spe.max_record_size <= 2048,
>>> +			"PMSIDR_EL1 maximum record size");
>>> +	report(spe.min_interval >= 256 && spe.min_interval <= 4096,
>>> +			"PMSIDR_EL1 minimum sampling interval");
>>> +	report(spe.fl_cap && spe.ft_cap && spe.fe_cap, "PMSIDR_EL1 sampling filters");
>> indeed all bits read as 1 as the spec says. which is bit weird by the way.
> 
> I think they added the fields because the architects wanted the flexibility to
> allow changes in the future.
OK

Thanks

Eric
> 
> Thanks,
> Alex
>>> +
>>> +	report_prefix_pop();
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>> +{
>>> +	if (!spe_probe()) {
>>> +		report_skip("SPE not supported");
>>> +		return report_summary();
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	printf("intid:           %u\n", PPI(spe.intid));
>>> +	printf("align: 	         %d\n", spe.align);
>>> +	printf("min_interval:    %d\n", spe.min_interval);
>>> +	printf("max_record_size: %d\n", spe.max_record_size);
>>> +
>>> +	if (argc < 2)
>>> +		report_abort("no test specified");
>>> +
>>> +	report_prefix_push("spe");
>>> +
>>> +	if (strcmp(argv[1], "spe-introspection") == 0)
>>> +		spe_test_introspection();
>>> +	else
>>> +		report_abort("Unknown subtest '%s'", argv[1]);
>>> +
>>> +	return report_summary();
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
>>> index f776b66ef96d..ad10be123774 100644
>>> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
>>> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
>>> @@ -134,6 +134,13 @@ extra_params = -append 'pmu-overflow-interrupt'
>>>  #groups = pmu
>>>  #accel = tcg
>>>  
>>> +[spe-introspection]
>>> +file = spe.flat
>>> +groups = spe
>>> +arch = arm64
>>> +accel = kvm
>>> +extra_params = -append 'spe-introspection'
>>> +
>>>  # Test GIC emulation
>>>  [gicv2-ipi]
>>>  file = gic.flat
>>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-30 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-27 17:19 [kvm-unit-tests RFC PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: Statistical Profiling Extension Tests Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC PATCH v2 1/5] arm64: Move get_id_aa64dfr0() in processor.h Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC PATCH v2 2/5] lib/{bitops,alloc_page}.h: Add missing headers Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-30 15:29   ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC PATCH v2 2/5] lib/{bitops, alloc_page}.h: " Auger Eric
2020-10-30 15:58     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC PATCH v2 3/5] arm64: spe: Add introspection test Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-30 15:29   ` Auger Eric
2020-10-30 15:59     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-30 17:09       ` Auger Eric [this message]
2020-10-30 17:50         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-30 17:52           ` Auger Eric
2020-11-02 10:47           ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-27 17:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC PATCH v2 4/5] lib: arm/arm64: Add function to unmap a page Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-30 15:46   ` Auger Eric
2020-10-30 16:00     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC PATCH v2 5/5] am64: spe: Add buffer test Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-30 17:59   ` Auger Eric
2020-10-30 16:02 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: Statistical Profiling Extension Tests Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-30 18:17 ` Auger Eric
2020-10-30 22:31   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-02 12:19     ` Auger Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c78da5aa-f429-d651-c460-b6cc46d6f188@redhat.com \
    --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).