From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D374FECE58C for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 03:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A9120873 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 03:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727816AbfJOD3b (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:29:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38814 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727092AbfJOD3b (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:29:31 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C10D308624A; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 03:29:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.72.12.168] (ovpn-12-168.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.168]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A635D6A9; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 03:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 6/7] virtio: introduce a mdev based transport To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, cunming.liang@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, rob.miller@broadcom.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, haotian.wang@sifive.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@intel.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, farman@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, sebott@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com, lingshan.zhu@intel.com, idos@mellanox.com, eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com, parav@mellanox.com, christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com, kevin.tian@intel.com References: <20191011081557.28302-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20191011081557.28302-7-jasowang@redhat.com> <20191014173942.GB5359@stefanha-x1.localdomain> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:29:07 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191014173942.GB5359@stefanha-x1.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.49]); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 03:29:30 +0000 (UTC) Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 2019/10/15 上午1:39, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:15:56PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> +struct virtio_mdev_device { >> + struct virtio_device vdev; >> + struct mdev_device *mdev; >> + unsigned long version; >> + >> + struct virtqueue **vqs; >> + /* The lock to protect virtqueue list */ >> + spinlock_t lock; >> + struct list_head virtqueues; > Is this a list of struct virtio_mdev_vq_info? Please document the > actual type in a comment. Ok. >> +static int virtio_mdev_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs, >> + struct virtqueue *vqs[], >> + vq_callback_t *callbacks[], >> + const char * const names[], >> + const bool *ctx, >> + struct irq_affinity *desc) >> +{ >> + struct virtio_mdev_device *vm_dev = to_virtio_mdev_device(vdev); >> + struct mdev_device *mdev = vm_get_mdev(vdev); >> + const struct virtio_mdev_device_ops *ops = mdev_get_dev_ops(mdev); >> + struct virtio_mdev_callback cb; >> + int i, err, queue_idx = 0; >> + >> + vm_dev->vqs = kmalloc_array(queue_idx, sizeof(*vm_dev->vqs), >> + GFP_KERNEL); > kmalloc_array(0, ...)? I would have expected nvqs instead of queue_idx > (0). > > What is this the purpose of vm_dev->vqs and does anything ever access it? It's useless, will remove it. Thanks