On 9/10/19 11:43 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 05/09/2019 12.39, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Testing SIGP emulation for the following order codes:
>> * start
>> * stop
>> * restart
>> * set prefix
>> * store status
>> * stop and store status
>> * reset
>> * initial reset
>> * external call
>> * emegergency call
>>
>> restart and set prefix are part of the library and needed to start
>> other cpus.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
> [...]
>> +static void test_store_status(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct cpu_status *status = alloc_pages(1);
>> +	uint32_t r;
>> +
>> +	report_prefix_push("store status at address");
>> +	memset(status, 0, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
>> +
>> +	report_prefix_push("running");
>> +	smp_cpu_restart(1);
>> +	sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, &r);
>> +	report("incorrect state", r == SIGP_STATUS_INCORRECT_STATE);
>> +	report("status not written", !memcmp(status, (void*)status + PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE));
>> +	report_prefix_pop();
>> +
>> +	memset(status, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
>> +	report_prefix_push("stopped");
>> +	smp_cpu_stop(1);
>> +	sigp(1, SIGP_STORE_STATUS_AT_ADDRESS, (uintptr_t)status, NULL);
>> +	while (!status->prefix) { mb(); }
>> +	report("status written", 1);
>> +	free_pages(status, PAGE_SIZE);
> 
> Shouldn't that be PAGE_SIZE * 2 instead?

Indeed

> 
>> +	report_prefix_pop();
>> +
>> +	report_prefix_pop();
>> +}
> 
> The remaining part of the patch looks fine to me.

Thanks for having a look

> 
>  Thomas
>