Re: [PATCH] Revert "irqbypass: do not start cons/prod when failed connect"

["Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>]

On 5/10/2021 6:00 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2021 09:32:54 +0100,
> "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/10/2021 3:09 PM, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/10/2021 12:34 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> 在 2021/5/10 上午11:00, Zhu, Lingshan 写道:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/10/2021 10:43 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>> 在 2021/5/8 下午3:11, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
>>>>>>> This reverts commit a979a6aa009f3c99689432e0cdb5402a4463fb88.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The reverted commit may cause VM freeze on arm64 platform.
>>>>>>> Because on arm64 platform, stop a consumer will suspend the VM,
>>>>>>> the VM will freeze without a start consumer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please resubmit with the formal process of stable
>>>>>> (stable-kernel-rules.rst).
>>>>> sure, I will re-submit it to stable kernel once it is merged into
>>>>> Linus tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> I think it's better to resubmit (option 1), see how
>>>> stable-kernel-rules.rst said:
>>>>
>>>> ""
>>>>
>>>> :ref:`option_1` is **strongly** preferred, is the easiest and most
>>>> common.
>>>> :ref:`option_2` and :ref:`option_3` are more useful if the patch
>>>> isn't deemed
>>>> worthy at the time it is applied to a public git tree (for
>>>> instance, because
>>>> it deserves more regression testing first).
>>>>
>>>> """
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>> OK, works for me, I will add cc stable, and resubmit it soon
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>> I just seeMarc has already added "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org", and
>> he would take the patch in his tree, so I think no need to resend.
> That's fine, I can fix things up myself and queue the fix for -rc2.
Thanks Marc!
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	M.
>