From: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: "alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"cjia@nvidia.com" <cjia@nvidia.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Yang, Ziye" <ziye.yang@intel.com>,
"Liu, Changpeng" <changpeng.liu@intel.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"mlevitsk@redhat.com" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
"eskultet@redhat.com" <eskultet@redhat.com>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"dgilbert@redhat.com" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"jonathan.davies@nutanix.com" <jonathan.davies@nutanix.com>,
"eauger@redhat.com" <eauger@redhat.com>,
"aik@ozlabs.ru" <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
"pasic@linux.ibm.com" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"felipe@nutanix.com" <felipe@nutanix.com>,
"Zhengxiao.zx@Alibaba-inc.com" <Zhengxiao.zx@Alibaba-inc.com>,
"shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com" <shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com>,
"Ken.Xue@amd.com" <Ken.Xue@amd.com>,
"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking.
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:58:13 +0530
Message-ID: <deb8b18f-aa79-70d3-ce05-89b607f813c4@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327003055.GB26419@joy-OptiPlex-7040>
Hit send button little early.
>
> I checked v12, it's not like what I said.
> In v12, bitmaps are generated per vfio_dma, and combination of the
> bitmaps are required in order to generate a big bitmap suiting for dirty
> query. It can cause problem when offset not aligning.
> But what I propose here is to generate an rb tree orthogonal to the tree
> of vfio_dma.
>
> as to CPU cycles saving, I don't think iterating/translating page by page
> would achieve that purpose.
>
Instead of creating one extra rb tree for dirty pages tracking in v10
tried to use dma->pfn_list itself, we tried changes in v10, v11 and v12,
latest version is evolved version with best possible approach after
discussion. Probably, go through v11 as well.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11298335/
Thanks,
Kirti
On 3/27/2020 6:00 AM, Yan Zhao wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:39:01AM +0800, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/25/2020 7:41 AM, Yan Zhao wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 05:18:52AM +0800, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>>>> VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES ioctl performs three operations:
>>>> - Start dirty pages tracking while migration is active
>>>> - Stop dirty pages tracking.
>>>> - Get dirty pages bitmap. Its user space application's responsibility to
>>>> copy content of dirty pages from source to destination during migration.
>>>>
>>>> To prevent DoS attack, memory for bitmap is allocated per vfio_dma
>>>> structure. Bitmap size is calculated considering smallest supported page
>>>> size. Bitmap is allocated for all vfio_dmas when dirty logging is enabled
>>>>
>>>> Bitmap is populated for already pinned pages when bitmap is allocated for
>>>> a vfio_dma with the smallest supported page size. Update bitmap from
>>>> pinning functions when tracking is enabled. When user application queries
>>>> bitmap, check if requested page size is same as page size used to
>>>> populated bitmap. If it is equal, copy bitmap, but if not equal, return
>>>> error.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 266 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 260 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>>>> index 70aeab921d0f..874a1a7ae925 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>>>> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct vfio_iommu {
>>>> unsigned int dma_avail;
>>>> bool v2;
>>>> bool nesting;
>>>> + bool dirty_page_tracking;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> struct vfio_domain {
>>>> @@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ struct vfio_dma {
>>>> bool lock_cap; /* capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK) */
>>>> struct task_struct *task;
>>>> struct rb_root pfn_list; /* Ex-user pinned pfn list */
>>>> + unsigned long *bitmap;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> struct vfio_group {
>>>> @@ -125,7 +127,21 @@ struct vfio_regions {
>>>> #define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu) \
>>>> (!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
>>>>
>>>> +#define DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(n) (ALIGN(n, BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) / BITS_PER_BYTE)
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Input argument of number of bits to bitmap_set() is unsigned integer, which
>>>> + * further casts to signed integer for unaligned multi-bit operation,
>>>> + * __bitmap_set().
>>>> + * Then maximum bitmap size supported is 2^31 bits divided by 2^3 bits/byte,
>>>> + * that is 2^28 (256 MB) which maps to 2^31 * 2^12 = 2^43 (8TB) on 4K page
>>>> + * system.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define DIRTY_BITMAP_PAGES_MAX (uint64_t)(INT_MAX - 1)
>>>> +#define DIRTY_BITMAP_SIZE_MAX DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(DIRTY_BITMAP_PAGES_MAX)
>>>> +
>>>> static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot);
>>>> +static unsigned long vfio_pgsize_bitmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu);
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * This code handles mapping and unmapping of user data buffers
>>>> @@ -175,6 +191,77 @@ static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
>>>> rb_erase(&old->node, &iommu->dma_list);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(struct vfio_dma *dma, uint64_t pgsize)
>>>> +{
>>>> + uint64_t npages = dma->size / pgsize;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (npages > DIRTY_BITMAP_PAGES_MAX)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + dma->bitmap = kvzalloc(DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!dma->bitmap)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void vfio_dma_bitmap_free(struct vfio_dma *dma)
>>>> +{
>>>> + kfree(dma->bitmap);
>>>> + dma->bitmap = NULL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void vfio_dma_populate_bitmap(struct vfio_dma *dma, uint64_t pgsize)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct rb_node *p;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dma->pfn_list))
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (p = rb_first(&dma->pfn_list); p; p = rb_next(p)) {
>>>> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn = rb_entry(p, struct vfio_pfn, node);
>>>> +
>>>> + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, (vpfn->iova - dma->iova) / pgsize, 1);
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, uint64_t pgsize)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct rb_node *n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
>>>> +
>>>> + for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
>>>> + struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(dma, pgsize);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + struct rb_node *p = rb_prev(n);
>>>> +
>>>> + for (; p; p = rb_prev(p)) {
>>>> + struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n,
>>>> + struct vfio_dma, node);
>>>> +
>>>> + vfio_dma_bitmap_free(dma);
>>>> + }
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> + vfio_dma_populate_bitmap(dma, pgsize);
>>>> + }
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void vfio_dma_bitmap_free_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct rb_node *n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
>>>> +
>>>> + for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
>>>> + struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
>>>> +
>>>> + vfio_dma_bitmap_free(dma);
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * Helper Functions for host iova-pfn list
>>>> */
>>>> @@ -567,6 +654,18 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void *iommu_data,
>>>> vfio_unpin_page_external(dma, iova, do_accounting);
>>>> goto pin_unwind;
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
>>>> + unsigned long pgshift =
>>>> + __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Bitmap populated with the smallest supported page
>>>> + * size
>>>> + */
>>>> + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap,
>>>> + (vpfn->iova - dma->iova) >> pgshift, 1);
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> ret = i;
>>>> @@ -801,6 +900,7 @@ static void vfio_remove_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
>>>> vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, true);
>>>> vfio_unlink_dma(iommu, dma);
>>>> put_task_struct(dma->task);
>>>> + vfio_dma_bitmap_free(dma);
>>>> kfree(dma);
>>>> iommu->dma_avail++;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -831,6 +931,57 @@ static unsigned long vfio_pgsize_bitmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>>>> return bitmap;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static int vfio_iova_dirty_bitmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, dma_addr_t iova,
>>>> + size_t size, uint64_t pgsize,
>>>> + u64 __user *bitmap)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct vfio_dma *dma;
>>>> + unsigned long pgshift = __ffs(pgsize);
>>>> + unsigned int npages, bitmap_size;
>>>> +
>>>> + dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, 1);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!dma)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (dma->iova != iova || dma->size != size)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>> Still don't sure if it's a good practice.
>>> I saw the qemu implementation.
>>> Qemu just iterates the whole IOVA address space,
>>> It needs to find IOTLB entry for an IOVA
>>> (1) if it can find an IOTLB for an IOVA, do the DIRTY_PAGES IOCTL and
>>> increment IOVA by (iotlb.addr_mask + 1)
>>>
>>> (2) if no existing IOTLB found, the imrc->translate needs to go searching shadow
>>> page table to try to generate one.
>>> if it still fails,(most probably case, as IOMMU only maps a small part in its address
>>> space). increment IOVA by 1 page.
>>>
>>> So, if the address space width is 39bit, and if there's only one page
>>> mapped, you still have to translate IOVA for around 2^27 times in each
>>> query. Isn't it too inefficient?
>>>
>>
>> This is Qemu side implementation, let discuss it on QEMU patches.
>>
> But kernel has to support it first, right?
>
>>> So, IMHO, why we could not just save an rb tree specific for dirty pages, then generate
>>> a bitmap for each query?
>>
>> This is looping back to implentation in v10 - v12 version. There are
>> problems discussed during v10 to v12 version of patches with this approach.
>> - populating dirty bitmap at the time of query will add more CPU cycles.
>> - If we save these CPU cyles means dirty pages need to be tracked when
>> they are pinned or dirtied by CPU, that is, inttoduced per vfio_dma
>> bitmap. If ranges are not vfio_dma aligned, then copying bitmap to user
>> space becomes complicated and unefficient.
>>
>> So we decided to go with the approach implemented here.
>
> I checked v12, it's not like what I said.
> In v12, bitmaps are generated per vfio_dma, and combination of the
> bitmaps are required in order to generate a big bitmap suiting for dirty
> query. It can cause problem when offset not aligning.
> But what I propose here is to generate an rb tree orthogonal to the tree
> of vfio_dma.
>
> as to CPU cycles saving, I don't think iterating/translating page by page
> would achieve that purpose.
>
>
>
>>>
>>>> + npages = dma->size >> pgshift;
>>>> + bitmap_size = DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* mark all pages dirty if all pages are pinned and mapped. */
>>>> + if (dma->iommu_mapped)
>>>> + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0, npages);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)bitmap, dma->bitmap, bitmap_size))
>>>> + return -EFAULT;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Re-populate bitmap to include all pinned pages which are considered
>>>> + * as dirty but exclude pages which are unpinned and pages which are
>>>> + * marked dirty by vfio_dma_rw()
>>>> + */
>>>> + bitmap_clear(dma->bitmap, 0, npages);
>>>> + vfio_dma_populate_bitmap(dma, pgsize);
>>> will this also repopulate bitmap for pinned pages set by pass-through devices in
>>> patch 07 ?
>>>
>>
>> If pass through device's driver pins pages using vfio_pin_pages and all
>> devices in the group pins pages through vfio_pin_pages, then
>> iommu->pinned_page_dirty_scope is set true, then bitmap is repolutated.
>>
>>
> pass-through devices already have all guest memory pinned, it would have
> no reason to call vfio_pin_pages if not attempting to mark page dirty.
> Then if it calls vfio_pin_pages, it means "the pages are accessed, please
> mark them dirty, feel free to clean it when you get it",
> not "the pages will be accesses, please mark them dirty continuously"
>
> Thanks
> Yan
>
>>
>>>
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int verify_bitmap_size(uint64_t npages, uint64_t bitmap_size)
>>>> +{
>>>> + uint64_t bsize;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!npages || !bitmap_size || (bitmap_size > DIRTY_BITMAP_SIZE_MAX))
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + bsize = DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (bitmap_size < bsize)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>>>> struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap)
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -1038,16 +1189,16 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>>>> unsigned long vaddr = map->vaddr;
>>>> size_t size = map->size;
>>>> int ret = 0, prot = 0;
>>>> - uint64_t mask;
>>>> + uint64_t pgsize;
>>>> struct vfio_dma *dma;
>>>>
>>>> /* Verify that none of our __u64 fields overflow */
>>>> if (map->size != size || map->vaddr != vaddr || map->iova != iova)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> - mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu))) - 1;
>>>> + pgsize = (uint64_t)1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
>>>>
>>>> - WARN_ON(mask & PAGE_MASK);
>>>> + WARN_ON((pgsize - 1) & PAGE_MASK);
>>>>
>>>> /* READ/WRITE from device perspective */
>>>> if (map->flags & VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_WRITE)
>>>> @@ -1055,7 +1206,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>>>> if (map->flags & VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_READ)
>>>> prot |= IOMMU_READ;
>>>>
>>>> - if (!prot || !size || (size | iova | vaddr) & mask)
>>>> + if (!prot || !size || (size | iova | vaddr) & (pgsize - 1))
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> /* Don't allow IOVA or virtual address wrap */
>>>> @@ -1130,6 +1281,12 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>>>> else
>>>> ret = vfio_pin_map_dma(iommu, dma, size);
>>>>
>>>> + if (!ret && iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
>>>> + ret = vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(dma, pgsize);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + vfio_remove_dma(iommu, dma);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> out_unlock:
>>>> mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>>> return ret;
>>>> @@ -2278,6 +2435,93 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>>>>
>>>> return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &unmap, minsz) ?
>>>> -EFAULT : 0;
>>>> + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES) {
>>>> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap dirty;
>>>> + uint32_t mask = VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_START |
>>>> + VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_STOP |
>>>> + VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_GET_BITMAP;
>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!iommu->v2)
>>>> + return -EACCES;
>>>> +
>>>> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap,
>>>> + flags);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (copy_from_user(&dirty, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
>>>> + return -EFAULT;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (dirty.argsz < minsz || dirty.flags & ~mask)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* only one flag should be set at a time */
>>>> + if (__ffs(dirty.flags) != __fls(dirty.flags))
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (dirty.flags & VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_START) {
>>>> + uint64_t pgsize = 1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>>>> + if (!iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
>>>> + ret = vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc_all(iommu, pgsize);
>>>> + if (!ret)
>>>> + iommu->dirty_page_tracking = true;
>>>> + }
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + } else if (dirty.flags & VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_STOP) {
>>>> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>>>> + if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
>>>> + iommu->dirty_page_tracking = false;
>>>> + vfio_dma_bitmap_free_all(iommu);
>>>> + }
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> + } else if (dirty.flags &
>>>> + VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_GET_BITMAP) {
>>>> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap_get range;
>>>> + unsigned long pgshift;
>>>> + size_t data_size = dirty.argsz - minsz;
>>>> + uint64_t iommu_pgsize =
>>>> + 1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!data_size || data_size < sizeof(range))
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (copy_from_user(&range, (void __user *)(arg + minsz),
>>>> + sizeof(range)))
>>>> + return -EFAULT;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* allow only smallest supported pgsize */
>>>> + if (range.bitmap.pgsize != iommu_pgsize)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + if (range.iova & (iommu_pgsize - 1))
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + if (!range.size || range.size & (iommu_pgsize - 1))
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + if (range.iova + range.size < range.iova)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + if (!access_ok((void __user *)range.bitmap.data,
>>>> + range.bitmap.size))
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + pgshift = __ffs(range.bitmap.pgsize);
>>>> + ret = verify_bitmap_size(range.size >> pgshift,
>>>> + range.bitmap.size);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>>>> + if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking)
>>>> + ret = vfio_iova_dirty_bitmap(iommu, range.iova,
>>>> + range.size, range.bitmap.pgsize,
>>>> + range.bitmap.data);
>>>> + else
>>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> return -ENOTTY;
>>>> @@ -2345,10 +2589,20 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_dma_rw_chunk(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>>>>
>>>> vaddr = dma->vaddr + offset;
>>>>
>>>> - if (write)
>>>> + if (write) {
>>>> *copied = __copy_to_user((void __user *)vaddr, data,
>>>> count) ? 0 : count;
>>>> - else
>>>> + if (*copied && iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
>>>> + unsigned long pgshift =
>>>> + __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Bitmap populated with the smallest supported page
>>>> + * size
>>>> + */
>>>> + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, offset >> pgshift,
>>>> + *copied >> pgshift);
>>>> + }
>>>> + } else
>>>> *copied = __copy_from_user(data, (void __user *)vaddr,
>>>> count) ? 0 : count;
>>>> if (kthread)
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.0
>>>>
next prev parent reply index
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 21:18 Kirti Wankhede
2020-03-25 2:11 ` Yan Zhao
2020-03-26 21:39 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-03-27 0:30 ` Yan Zhao
2020-03-27 5:07 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-03-30 2:07 ` Yan Zhao
2020-03-30 20:47 ` Alex Williamson
2020-03-30 23:49 ` Yan Zhao
2020-03-27 5:28 ` Kirti Wankhede [this message]
2020-03-30 3:24 ` Yan Zhao
2020-03-30 13:49 ` Kirti Wankhede
2020-03-30 23:51 ` Yan Zhao
2020-03-31 0:53 ` Alex Williamson
2020-03-31 0:50 ` Yan Zhao
2020-03-31 1:12 ` Alex Williamson
2020-03-31 1:16 ` Yan Zhao
2020-03-31 2:38 ` Alex Williamson
2020-03-31 2:40 ` Zhao, Yan Y
2020-03-27 11:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-03-27 13:57 ` Alex Williamson
2020-03-27 14:09 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-24 19:32 [PATCH v16 Kernel 0/7] KABIs to support migration for VFIO devices Kirti Wankhede
2020-03-24 19:32 ` [PATCH v16 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking Kirti Wankhede
2020-03-24 20:37 ` Alex Williamson
2020-03-24 20:45 ` Alex Williamson
2020-03-24 21:48 ` Kirti Wankhede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=deb8b18f-aa79-70d3-ce05-89b607f813c4@nvidia.com \
--to=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=Ken.Xue@amd.com \
--cc=Zhengxiao.zx@Alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=eskultet@redhat.com \
--cc=felipe@nutanix.com \
--cc=jonathan.davies@nutanix.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
--cc=ziye.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
KVM Archive on lore.kernel.org
Archives are clonable:
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0 kvm/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 kvm kvm/ https://lore.kernel.org/kvm \
kvm@vger.kernel.org
public-inbox-index kvm
Example config snippet for mirrors
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.kvm
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git