From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531AAC4741F for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB77A208FE for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="hMBciB/e" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729277AbgI2NHw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:07:52 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:55434 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728346AbgI2NHw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:07:52 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08TD1lhL087243; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:07:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=ZcPwatVVGGsdrG5qoLd7oo/6QSYi4b7oVsRPZCVSCv0=; b=hMBciB/e/paaxMbwOcrlTziWVDhjn90lQ4Nfk0ddWI9bPQxQSwqHBNNaKAxYLc7TkR3k 6nVG2S1qN564KFhPtGTXSySMg5wRdNjl/9T0+4hrgQ34K6xoeLrOnY9cEpgSysxFVZtq +BAEQBGF4GqebDLXOHIV0SeyfrahJkjmywx1iqqGGs1/KXC4SKGnWkEENVKIIOGNI+Tf kgfXUbma9GXJirC9xwsSnaR5/Q97QbMbU7SB3kn05TnDe75W6TPGYu18Z6sr8aGAAM0A /Knlf0ekf/B3hzY6vEa8YyjE0qe2t+jjBIinbJAQh8qUNr8eJUIfGKF1Cw769M/TAFHs jA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33v58ygs2t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:07:48 -0400 Received: from m0098421.ppops.net (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 08TD3d1O097479; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:07:47 -0400 Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33v58ygs1r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:07:47 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08TCw6Xu017060; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:07:46 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.20]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 33sw99395q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:07:46 +0000 Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.233]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 08TD7gTX24773098 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:07:42 GMT Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FC9136067; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:07:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A267136055; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:07:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.170.177]) by b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:07:40 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 02/16] s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to search for queue devices To: Halil Pasic Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, fiuczy@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, kernel test robot References: <20200821195616.13554-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20200821195616.13554-3-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20200925042729.3b9d5704.pasic@linux.ibm.com> From: Tony Krowiak Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:07:40 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200925042729.3b9d5704.pasic@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-29_04:2020-09-29,2020-09-29 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009290111 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 9/24/20 10:27 PM, Halil Pasic wrote: > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:56:02 -0400 > Tony Krowiak wrote: > >> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> @@ -26,43 +26,26 @@ >> >> static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct mdev_device *mdev); >> >> -static int match_apqn(struct device *dev, const void *data) >> -{ >> - struct vfio_ap_queue *q = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> - >> - return (q->apqn == *(int *)(data)) ? 1 : 0; >> -} >> - >> /** >> - * vfio_ap_get_queue: Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from a list >> - * @matrix_mdev: the associated mediated matrix >> + * vfio_ap_get_queue: Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN. >> * @apqn: The queue APQN >> * >> - * Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from the list of the >> - * devices of the vfio_ap_drv. >> - * Verify that the APID and the APQI are set in the matrix. >> + * Retrieve a queue with a specific APQN from the AP queue devices attached to >> + * the AP bus. >> * >> - * Returns the pointer to the associated vfio_ap_queue >> + * Returns the pointer to the vfio_ap_queue with the specified APQN, or NULL. >> */ >> -static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_get_queue( >> - struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev, >> - int apqn) >> +static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_get_queue(unsigned long apqn) >> { >> + struct ap_queue *queue; >> struct vfio_ap_queue *q; >> - struct device *dev; >> >> - if (!test_bit_inv(AP_QID_CARD(apqn), matrix_mdev->matrix.apm)) >> - return NULL; >> - if (!test_bit_inv(AP_QID_QUEUE(apqn), matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm)) >> + queue = ap_get_qdev(apqn); >> + if (!queue) >> return NULL; >> >> - dev = driver_find_device(&matrix_dev->vfio_ap_drv->driver, NULL, >> - &apqn, match_apqn); >> - if (!dev) >> - return NULL; >> - q = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> - q->matrix_mdev = matrix_mdev; >> - put_device(dev); >> + q = dev_get_drvdata(&queue->ap_dev.device); > Is this cast here safe? (I don't think it is.) In the probe, we execute: dev_set_drvdata(&queue->ap_dev.device, q); I don't get any compile nor execution errors. Why wouldn't it be safe? > >> + put_device(&queue->ap_dev.device); >> >> return q; >> }