From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE569C433DB for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2681229CA for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2392170AbhALQFF (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:05:05 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:48980 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2392027AbhALQFF (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:05:05 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DD51FB; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 08:04:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.110] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29ADD3F719; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 08:04:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] KVM: arm64: Simplify argument passing to vgic_uaccess_[read|write] To: Eric Auger , eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, maz@kernel.org, drjones@redhat.com Cc: james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, shuah@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com References: <20201212185010.26579-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20201212185010.26579-8-eric.auger@redhat.com> From: Alexandru Elisei Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:04:24 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201212185010.26579-8-eric.auger@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi Eric, On 12/12/20 6:50 PM, Eric Auger wrote: > Instead of converting the vgic_io_device handle to a kvm_io_device > handled and then do the oppositive, pass a vgic_io_device pointer all > along the call chain. To me, it looks like the commit message describes what the patch does instead of why it does it. What are "vgic_io_device handle" and "kvm_io_device handled"? Thanks, Alex > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c | 10 ++++------ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c > index b2d73fc0d1ef..48c6067fc5ec 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c > @@ -938,10 +938,9 @@ vgic_get_mmio_region(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_io_device *iodev, > return region; > } > > -static int vgic_uaccess_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_io_device *dev, > +static int vgic_uaccess_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_io_device *iodev, > gpa_t addr, u32 *val) > { > - struct vgic_io_device *iodev = kvm_to_vgic_iodev(dev); > const struct vgic_register_region *region; > struct kvm_vcpu *r_vcpu; > > @@ -960,10 +959,9 @@ static int vgic_uaccess_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_io_device *dev, > return 0; > } > > -static int vgic_uaccess_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_io_device *dev, > +static int vgic_uaccess_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_io_device *iodev, > gpa_t addr, const u32 *val) > { > - struct vgic_io_device *iodev = kvm_to_vgic_iodev(dev); > const struct vgic_register_region *region; > struct kvm_vcpu *r_vcpu; > > @@ -986,9 +984,9 @@ int vgic_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_io_device *dev, > bool is_write, int offset, u32 *val) > { > if (is_write) > - return vgic_uaccess_write(vcpu, &dev->dev, offset, val); > + return vgic_uaccess_write(vcpu, dev, offset, val); > else > - return vgic_uaccess_read(vcpu, &dev->dev, offset, val); > + return vgic_uaccess_read(vcpu, dev, offset, val); > } > > static int dispatch_mmio_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_io_device *dev,