From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Micro-optimize nEPT's bad memptype/XWR checks
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 19:17:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f23a2801-d33d-4c2d-290e-60b0fa142cb5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200110160453.GA21485@linux.intel.com>
On 10/01/20 17:04, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Ya, I don't love the code, but it was the least awful of the options I
> tried, in that it's the most readable without being too obnoxious.
>
>
> Similar to your suggestion, but it avoids evaluating __is_bad_mt_xwr() if
> reserved bits are set, which is admittedly rare.
>
> return __is_rsvd_bits_set(&mmu->guest_rsvd_check, gpte, level)
> #if PTTYPE == PTTYPE_EPT
> || __is_bad_mt_xwr(&mmu->guest_rsvd_check, gpte)
> #endif
> ;
>
> Or macrofying the call to keep the call site clean, but IMO this obfuscates
> things too much.
>
> return __is_rsvd_bits_set(&mmu->guest_rsvd_check, gpte, level) ||
> IS_BAD_MT_XWR(&mmu->guest_rsvd_check, gpte);
I think what you posted is the best (David's comes second).
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-09 23:06 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize rsvd pte checks Sean Christopherson
2020-01-09 23:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Reorder the reserved bit check in prefetch_invalid_gpte() Sean Christopherson
2020-01-10 11:37 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-09 23:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Micro-optimize nEPT's bad memptype/XWR checks Sean Christopherson
2020-01-10 11:37 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-01-10 16:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-01-10 16:13 ` David Laight
2020-01-15 18:17 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f23a2801-d33d-4c2d-290e-60b0fa142cb5@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).