kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] KVM: x86: Move uret MSR slot management to common x86
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 11:28:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3a4ae84a227d131540762c55d357c6d7f48ac48.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210504171734.1434054-14-seanjc@google.com>

On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 10:17 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Now that SVM and VMX both probe MSRs before "defining" user return slots
> for them, consolidate the code for probe+define into common x86 and
> eliminate the odd behavior of having the vendor code define the slot for
> a given MSR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  3 +--
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c          |  5 +----
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c          | 19 ++++---------------
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 19 +++++++++++--------
>  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 10663610f105..a4b912f7e427 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1778,9 +1778,8 @@ int kvm_pv_send_ipi(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long ipi_bitmap_low,
>  		    unsigned long ipi_bitmap_high, u32 min,
>  		    unsigned long icr, int op_64_bit);
>  
> -void kvm_define_user_return_msr(unsigned index, u32 msr);
> +int kvm_add_user_return_msr(u32 msr);
>  int kvm_find_user_return_msr(u32 msr);
> -int kvm_probe_user_return_msr(u32 msr);
>  int kvm_set_user_return_msr(unsigned index, u64 val, u64 mask);
>  
>  u64 kvm_scale_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 tsc);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 231b9650d864..de921935e8de 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -959,10 +959,7 @@ static __init int svm_hardware_setup(void)
>  		kvm_tsc_scaling_ratio_frac_bits = 32;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!kvm_probe_user_return_msr(MSR_TSC_AUX)) {
> -		tsc_aux_uret_slot = 0;
> -		kvm_define_user_return_msr(tsc_aux_uret_slot, MSR_TSC_AUX);
> -	}
> +	tsc_aux_uret_slot = kvm_add_user_return_msr(MSR_TSC_AUX);
>  
>  	/* Check for pause filtering support */
>  	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAUSEFILTER)) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 7a53568b34fc..26f82f302391 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -454,9 +454,6 @@ static inline void vmx_segment_cache_clear(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>  
>  static unsigned long host_idt_base;
>  
> -/* Number of user return MSRs that are actually supported in hardware. */
> -static int vmx_nr_uret_msrs;
> -
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
>  static bool __read_mostly enlightened_vmcs = true;
>  module_param(enlightened_vmcs, bool, 0444);
> @@ -1218,7 +1215,7 @@ void vmx_prepare_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 */
>  	if (!vmx->guest_uret_msrs_loaded) {
>  		vmx->guest_uret_msrs_loaded = true;
> -		for (i = 0; i < vmx_nr_uret_msrs; ++i) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < kvm_nr_uret_msrs; ++i) {
>  			if (!vmx->guest_uret_msrs[i].load_into_hardware)
>  				continue;
>  
> @@ -6921,7 +6918,7 @@ static int vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  			goto free_vpid;
>  	}
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < vmx_nr_uret_msrs; ++i) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < kvm_nr_uret_msrs; ++i) {
>  		vmx->guest_uret_msrs[i].data = 0;
>  		vmx->guest_uret_msrs[i].mask = -1ull;
>  	}
> @@ -7810,20 +7807,12 @@ static __init void vmx_setup_user_return_msrs(void)
>  		MSR_EFER, MSR_TSC_AUX, MSR_STAR,
>  		MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL,
>  	};
> -	u32 msr;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(vmx_uret_msrs_list) != MAX_NR_USER_RETURN_MSRS);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vmx_uret_msrs_list); ++i) {
> -		msr = vmx_uret_msrs_list[i];
> -
> -		if (kvm_probe_user_return_msr(msr))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		kvm_define_user_return_msr(vmx_nr_uret_msrs, msr);
> -		vmx_nr_uret_msrs++;
> -	}
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vmx_uret_msrs_list); ++i)
> +		kvm_add_user_return_msr(vmx_uret_msrs_list[i]);
>  }
>  
>  static __init int hardware_setup(void)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 2fd46e917666..adca491d3b4b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static void kvm_on_user_return(struct user_return_notifier *urn)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -int kvm_probe_user_return_msr(u32 msr)
> +static int kvm_probe_user_return_msr(u32 msr)
>  {
>  	u64 val;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -350,16 +350,18 @@ int kvm_probe_user_return_msr(u32 msr)
>  	preempt_enable();
>  	return ret;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_probe_user_return_msr);
>  
> -void kvm_define_user_return_msr(unsigned slot, u32 msr)
> +int kvm_add_user_return_msr(u32 msr)
>  {
> -	BUG_ON(slot >= KVM_MAX_NR_USER_RETURN_MSRS);
> -	kvm_uret_msrs_list[slot] = msr;
> -	if (slot >= kvm_nr_uret_msrs)
> -		kvm_nr_uret_msrs = slot + 1;
> +	BUG_ON(kvm_nr_uret_msrs >= KVM_MAX_NR_USER_RETURN_MSRS);
> +
> +	if (kvm_probe_user_return_msr(msr))
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	kvm_uret_msrs_list[kvm_nr_uret_msrs] = msr;
> +	return kvm_nr_uret_msrs++;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_define_user_return_msr);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_add_user_return_msr);
>  
>  int kvm_find_user_return_msr(u32 msr)
>  {
> @@ -8169,6 +8171,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
>  		printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: failed to allocate percpu kvm_user_return_msrs\n");
>  		goto out_free_x86_emulator_cache;
>  	}
> +	kvm_nr_uret_msrs = 0;
>  
>  	r = kvm_mmu_module_init();
>  	if (r)
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky





  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-10  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-04 17:17 [PATCH 00/15] KVM: x86: RDPID/RDTSCP fixes and uret MSR cleanups Sean Christopherson
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: VMX: Do not adverise RDPID if ENABLE_RDTSCP control is unsupported Sean Christopherson
2021-05-04 17:37   ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-04 17:53     ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-04 18:14       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-05  3:04   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-05-10  8:03   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 02/15] KVM: x86: Emulate RDPID only if RDTSCP is supported Sean Christopherson
2021-05-04 17:50   ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-05  3:51   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-05-05  8:01     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10  8:08   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-10 17:20     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-11 12:32       ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 03/15] KVM: SVM: Inject #UD on RDTSCP when it should be disabled in the guest Sean Christopherson
2021-05-04 21:45   ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-04 21:53     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-04 21:56       ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-04 22:10         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-04 22:24           ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-04 21:57       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-04 21:58         ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-10  8:08           ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-10 16:56             ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-11 12:34               ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-18 10:59               ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-18 19:24                 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-05  4:26   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-05-10  8:08   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 04/15] KVM: x86: Move RDPID emulation intercept to its own enum Sean Christopherson
2021-05-04 23:24   ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-10  8:14   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 05/15] KVM: VMX: Disable preemption when probing user return MSRs Sean Christopherson
2021-05-04 23:36   ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-10  8:18   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 06/15] KVM: SVM: Probe and load MSR_TSC_AUX regardless of RDTSCP support in host Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10  8:20   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 07/15] KVM: x86: Add support for RDPID without RDTSCP Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10  8:20   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 08/15] KVM: VMX: Configure list of user return MSRs at module init Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10  8:23   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-10 15:13     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-11 12:34       ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-11 20:10         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 09/15] KVM: VMX: Use flag to indicate "active" uret MSRs instead of sorting list Sean Christopherson
2021-05-08  3:31   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-05-10 16:43     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10 17:55       ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-05-10  8:25   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 10/15] KVM: VMX: Use common x86's uret MSR list as the one true list Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10  8:25   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 11/15] KVM: VMX: Disable loading of TSX_CTRL MSR the more conventional way Sean Christopherson
2021-05-05  8:49   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-05 15:36     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-05 15:50       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10  8:26   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 12/15] KVM: x86: Export the number of uret MSRs to vendor modules Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10  8:27   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 13/15] KVM: x86: Move uret MSR slot management to common x86 Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10  8:28   ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 14/15] KVM: x86: Tie Intel and AMD behavior for MSR_TSC_AUX to guest CPU model Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10  8:29   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-10 16:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10 17:11       ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-11 12:34         ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 15/15] KVM: x86: Hide RDTSCP and RDPID if MSR_TSC_AUX probing failed Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10  8:29   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-05  8:51 ` [PATCH 00/15] KVM: x86: RDPID/RDTSCP fixes and uret MSR cleanups Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f3a4ae84a227d131540762c55d357c6d7f48ac48.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 13/15] KVM: x86: Move uret MSR slot management to common x86' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).