kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] s390/kvm: extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return entry pointer
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:35:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7fabdb6-e53a-1c17-92a8-3240b0c03e47@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210209154302.1033165-2-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

On 2/9/21 4:43 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> Extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return the pointer to the valid leaf
> DAT table entry, or to the invalid entry.
> 
> Also return some flags in the lower bits of the address:
> DAT_PROT: indicates that DAT protection applies because of the
>           protection bit in the segment (or, if EDAT, region) tables
> NOT_PTE: indicates that the address of the DAT table entry returned
>          does not refer to a PTE, but to a segment or region table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@de.ibm.com>

Small nit below.

> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h |  5 ++++-
>  arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c    |  8 ++++----
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> index 6d6b57059493..e0ab83f051d2 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> @@ -976,7 +976,9 @@ int kvm_s390_check_low_addr_prot_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra)
>   * kvm_s390_shadow_tables - walk the guest page table and create shadow tables
>   * @sg: pointer to the shadow guest address space structure
>   * @saddr: faulting address in the shadow gmap
> - * @pgt: pointer to the page table address result
> + * @pgt: pointer to the beginning of the page table for the given address if
> + *       successful (return value 0), or to the first invalid DAT entry in
> + *       case of exceptions (return value > 0)
>   * @fake: pgt references contiguous guest memory block, not a pgtable
>   */
>  static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
> @@ -1034,6 +1036,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>  			rfte.val = ptr;
>  			goto shadow_r2t;
>  		}
> +		*pgt = ptr + vaddr.rfx * 8;
>  		rc = gmap_read_table(parent, ptr + vaddr.rfx * 8, &rfte.val);
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
> @@ -1060,6 +1063,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>  			rste.val = ptr;
>  			goto shadow_r3t;
>  		}
> +		*pgt = ptr + vaddr.rsx * 8;
>  		rc = gmap_read_table(parent, ptr + vaddr.rsx * 8, &rste.val);
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
> @@ -1087,6 +1091,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>  			rtte.val = ptr;
>  			goto shadow_sgt;
>  		}
> +		*pgt = ptr + vaddr.rtx * 8;
>  		rc = gmap_read_table(parent, ptr + vaddr.rtx * 8, &rtte.val);
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
> @@ -1123,6 +1128,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>  			ste.val = ptr;
>  			goto shadow_pgt;
>  		}
> +		*pgt = ptr + vaddr.sx * 8;
>  		rc = gmap_read_table(parent, ptr + vaddr.sx * 8, &ste.val);
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
> @@ -1157,6 +1163,8 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>   * @vcpu: virtual cpu
>   * @sg: pointer to the shadow guest address space structure
>   * @saddr: faulting address in the shadow gmap
> + * @datptr: will contain the address of the faulting DAT table entry, or of
> + *          the valid leaf, plus some flags
>   *
>   * Returns: - 0 if the shadow fault was successfully resolved
>   *	    - > 0 (pgm exception code) on exceptions while faulting
> @@ -1165,11 +1173,11 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>   *	    - -ENOMEM if out of memory
>   */
>  int kvm_s390_shadow_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct gmap *sg,
> -			  unsigned long saddr)
> +			  unsigned long saddr, unsigned long *datptr)
>  {
>  	union vaddress vaddr;
>  	union page_table_entry pte;
> -	unsigned long pgt;
> +	unsigned long pgt = 0;
>  	int dat_protection, fake;
>  	int rc;
>  
> @@ -1191,8 +1199,20 @@ int kvm_s390_shadow_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct gmap *sg,
>  		pte.val = pgt + vaddr.px * PAGE_SIZE;
>  		goto shadow_page;
>  	}
> -	if (!rc)
> -		rc = gmap_read_table(sg->parent, pgt + vaddr.px * 8, &pte.val);
> +
> +	switch (rc) {
> +	case PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION:
> +	case PGM_REGION_THIRD_TRANS:
> +	case PGM_REGION_SECOND_TRANS:
> +	case PGM_REGION_FIRST_TRANS:
> +		pgt |= NOT_PTE;
> +		break;
> +	case 0:
> +		pgt += vaddr.px * 8;
> +		rc = gmap_read_table(sg->parent, pgt, &pte.val);
> +	}
> +	if (*datptr)
> +		*datptr = pgt | dat_protection * DAT_PROT;
>  	if (!rc && pte.i)
>  		rc = PGM_PAGE_TRANSLATION;
>  	if (!rc && pte.z)
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
> index f4c51756c462..fec26bbb17ba 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h
> @@ -359,7 +359,10 @@ void ipte_unlock(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  int ipte_lock_held(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  int kvm_s390_check_low_addr_prot_real(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gra);
>  
> +#define DAT_PROT 2
> +#define NOT_PTE 4

I'd like to have a PEI prefix and a short comment where this comes from,
something like:
"MVPG PEI indication bits"

> +
>  int kvm_s390_shadow_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct gmap *shadow,
> -			  unsigned long saddr);
> +			  unsigned long saddr, unsigned long *datptr);
>  
>  #endif /* __KVM_S390_GACCESS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> index c5d0a58b2c29..7db022141db3 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> @@ -619,10 +619,10 @@ static int map_prefix(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
>  	/* with mso/msl, the prefix lies at offset *mso* */
>  	prefix += scb_s->mso;
>  
> -	rc = kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap, prefix);
> +	rc = kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap, prefix, NULL);
>  	if (!rc && (scb_s->ecb & ECB_TE))
>  		rc = kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap,
> -					   prefix + PAGE_SIZE);
> +					   prefix + PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
>  	/*
>  	 * We don't have to mprotect, we will be called for all unshadows.
>  	 * SIE will detect if protection applies and trigger a validity.
> @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int handle_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
>  				    current->thread.gmap_addr, 1);
>  
>  	rc = kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap,
> -				   current->thread.gmap_addr);
> +				   current->thread.gmap_addr, NULL);
>  	if (rc > 0) {
>  		rc = inject_fault(vcpu, rc,
>  				  current->thread.gmap_addr,
> @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static void handle_last_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  {
>  	if (vsie_page->fault_addr)
>  		kvm_s390_shadow_fault(vcpu, vsie_page->gmap,
> -				      vsie_page->fault_addr);
> +				      vsie_page->fault_addr, NULL);
>  	vsie_page->fault_addr = 0;
>  }
>  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-11  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-09 15:43 [PATCH v3 0/2] s390/kvm: fix MVPG when in VSIE Claudio Imbrenda
2021-02-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] s390/kvm: extend kvm_s390_shadow_fault to return entry pointer Claudio Imbrenda
2021-02-11  8:35   ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2021-02-11  9:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-11 12:57     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-02-11 13:15       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-09 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] s390/kvm: VSIE: correctly handle MVPG when in VSIE Claudio Imbrenda
2021-02-11  8:46   ` Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7fabdb6-e53a-1c17-92a8-3240b0c03e47@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).