From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests] svm: Verify the effect of V_INTR_MASKING on INTR interrupts
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 14:34:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fed4c647-8ed7-3653-d790-26261c3671d3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203132426.21244-1-cavery@redhat.com>
On 03/12/19 14:24, Cathy Avery wrote:
> The test confirms the influence of the V_INTR_MASKING bit
> on RFLAGS.IF. The expectation is while running a guest
> with V_INTR_MASKING cleared to zero:
>
> - EFLAGS.IF controls both virtual and physical interrupts.
>
> While running a guest with V_INTR_MASKING set to 1:
>
> - The host EFLAGS.IF at the time of the VMRUN is saved and
> controls physical interrupts while the guest is running.
>
> - The guest value of EFLAGS.IF controls virtual interrupts only.
>
> As discussed previously, this patch also modifies the vmrun
> loop ( test_run ) to allow running with HIF=0
Looks good, just a couple nits below.
> Signed-off-by: Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>
> ---
> x86/svm.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/x86/svm.c b/x86/svm.c
> index 0360d8d..fb5796f 100644
> --- a/x86/svm.c
> +++ b/x86/svm.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ u64 runs;
> u8 *io_bitmap;
> u8 io_bitmap_area[16384];
>
> +u64 set_host_if = 1;
"u8 set_host_if;" here
> +
> #define MSR_BITMAP_SIZE 8192
>
> u8 *msr_bitmap;
> @@ -266,21 +268,24 @@ static void test_run(struct test *test, struct vmcb *vmcb)
... "set_host_if = 1;" before invoking the ->prepare function...
> tsc_start = rdtsc();
> asm volatile (
> "clgi \n\t"
> + "cmp $0, set_host_if\n\t"
... and cmpb here.
> + "jz 1f\n\t"
> + "sti \n\t"
> + "1: \n\t"
> "vmload \n\t"
> "mov regs+0x80, %%r15\n\t" // rflags
> "mov %%r15, 0x170(%0)\n\t"
> "mov regs, %%r15\n\t" // rax
> "mov %%r15, 0x1f8(%0)\n\t"
> LOAD_GPR_C
> - "sti \n\t" // only used if V_INTR_MASKING=1
> "vmrun \n\t"
> - "cli \n\t"
> SAVE_GPR_C
> "mov 0x170(%0), %%r15\n\t" // rflags
> "mov %%r15, regs+0x80\n\t"
> "mov 0x1f8(%0), %%r15\n\t" // rax
> "mov %%r15, regs\n\t"
> "vmsave \n\t"
> + "cli \n\t"
> "stgi"
> : : "a"(vmcb_phys)
> : "rbx", "rcx", "rdx", "rsi",
> @@ -307,6 +312,7 @@ static bool default_supported(void)
> static void default_prepare(struct test *test)
> {
> vmcb_ident(test->vmcb);
> + cli();
I think this is not needed, perhaps it's a relic of rebasing your
previous patch?
Thanks,
Paolo
> }
>
> static bool default_finished(struct test *test)
> @@ -1386,6 +1392,99 @@ static bool pending_event_check(struct test *test)
> return get_test_stage(test) == 2;
> }
>
> +static void pending_event_prepare_vmask(struct test *test)
> +{
> + default_prepare(test);
> +
> + pending_event_ipi_fired = false;
> +
> + set_host_if = 0;
> +
> + handle_irq(0xf1, pending_event_ipi_isr);
> +
> + apic_icr_write(APIC_DEST_SELF | APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL |
> + APIC_DM_FIXED | 0xf1, 0);
> +
> + set_test_stage(test, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void pending_event_test_vmask(struct test *test)
> +{
> + if (pending_event_ipi_fired == true) {
> + set_test_stage(test, -1);
> + report("Interrupt preceeded guest", false);
> + vmmcall();
> + }
> +
> + irq_enable();
> + asm volatile ("nop");
> + irq_disable();
> +
> + if (pending_event_ipi_fired != true) {
> + set_test_stage(test, -1);
> + report("Interrupt not triggered by guest", false);
> + }
> +
> + vmmcall();
> +
> + irq_enable();
> + asm volatile ("nop");
> + irq_disable();
> +}
> +
> +static bool pending_event_finished_vmask(struct test *test)
> +{
> + if ( test->vmcb->control.exit_code != SVM_EXIT_VMMCALL) {
> + report("VM_EXIT return to host is not EXIT_VMMCALL exit reason 0x%x", false,
> + test->vmcb->control.exit_code);
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + switch (get_test_stage(test)) {
> + case 0:
> + test->vmcb->save.rip += 3;
> +
> + pending_event_ipi_fired = false;
> +
> + test->vmcb->control.int_ctl |= V_INTR_MASKING_MASK;
> +
> + apic_icr_write(APIC_DEST_SELF | APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL |
> + APIC_DM_FIXED | 0xf1, 0);
> +
> + break;
> +
> + case 1:
> + if (pending_event_ipi_fired == true) {
> + report("Interrupt triggered by guest", false);
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + irq_enable();
> + asm volatile ("nop");
> + irq_disable();
> +
> + if (pending_event_ipi_fired != true) {
> + report("Interrupt not triggered by host", false);
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + inc_test_stage(test);
> +
> + return get_test_stage(test) == 2;
> +}
> +
> +static bool pending_event_check_vmask(struct test *test)
> +{
> + set_host_if = 1;
> + return get_test_stage(test) == 2;
> +}
> +
> static struct test tests[] = {
> { "null", default_supported, default_prepare, null_test,
> default_finished, null_check },
> @@ -1438,6 +1537,9 @@ static struct test tests[] = {
> lat_svm_insn_finished, lat_svm_insn_check },
> { "pending_event", default_supported, pending_event_prepare,
> pending_event_test, pending_event_finished, pending_event_check },
> + { "pending_event_vmask", default_supported, pending_event_prepare_vmask,
> + pending_event_test_vmask, pending_event_finished_vmask,
> + pending_event_check_vmask },
> };
>
> int main(int ac, char **av)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-03 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-03 13:24 [PATCH kvm-unit-tests] svm: Verify the effect of V_INTR_MASKING on INTR interrupts Cathy Avery
2019-12-03 13:34 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fed4c647-8ed7-3653-d790-26261c3671d3@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=cavery@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).