From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888D7C28CC3 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F245248CB for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:52:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1F245248CB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935994A4F1; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:52:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id twZaHPVdu+GK; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:52:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390554A2E5; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:52:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D0D4A2E5 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:52:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cbwGCnyVDkOm for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:52:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1483C4005D for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:52:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADBC80D; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.196.129] (ostrya.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.129]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3D9C3F5AF; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/29] iommu: Add a timeout parameter for PRQ response To: Alex Williamson , Eric Auger References: <20190526161004.25232-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190526161004.25232-6-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190603163214.483884a7@x1.home> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker Message-ID: <13428eef-9b95-0f79-bebf-317a2205673a@arm.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 11:52:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190603163214.483884a7@x1.home> Content-Language: en-US Cc: "kevin.tian@intel.com" , "jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com" , "ashok.raj@intel.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Marc Zyngier , "joro@8bytes.org" , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "yi.l.liu@intel.com" , Vincent Stehle , Robin Murphy , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On 03/06/2019 23:32, Alex Williamson wrote: > It doesn't seem to make much sense to include this patch without also > including "iommu: handle page response timeout". Was that one lost? > Dropped? Lives elsewhere? The first 7 patches come from my sva/api branch, where I had forgotten to add the "handle page response timeout" patch. I added it back, probably after Eric sent this version. But I don't think the patch is ready for upstream, as we still haven't decided how to proceed with timeouts. Patches 6 and 7 are for debugging, I don't know if they should go upstream. Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm